Transcript Document

National Agency for Energy Conservation
Improved Performance through Higher
Standards: Energy Labeling and MEPS;
the Tunisian experience
Presentation by:
Fethi HANCHI
Director - Division of Rational Utilization of Energy
Contents
1. The energy supply & demand background
2. Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
3. Main Results
4. Success Factors & Lessons Learned
Energy supply & demand background
Since 2000, Tunisia has
become a net energy
importer.
In 2012, the energy
independence ratio was
approximately 80% with a
deficit of 1.6 Million toe.
This is mainly due to the
decrease of the resources
and the rapid growth in
demand
the energy deficit is
dominated by natural gas
(75%).
This energy is the main
source of electricity
generation.
Evolution of Energy Balance (ktoe)
4000
Surplus
Deficit
3000
2012  1635 ktoe
2000
1000
0
-1000
-2000
1980
1990
2000
2012
Energy supply & demand background
Evolution of Capacity installed and Peak load
Rapid growth of the peak
load that generates
increasing needs of
investment in electricity
generation capacity
(MW)
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Electricity Generated Capacity
Peak load
Energy supply & demand background
Primary Energy Cost (TND/toe)
From 2004 to 2012, the
share of energy
expenditure in GDP has
increased from 5% to 14%!!
1000
993
876
750
732
665
591
536
500
491
408
301
250
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Energy supply & demand background
Evolution of Energy subsidies and its share in
GDP
3.5%
3.0%
2004-2012
3.0%
2000
Subsidies (million of TND)
From 2004 to 2012, Energy
Subsidies has increased
from 0,5% to 3% Of GDP!
2500
2.4%
7000 Million TND
2111
2.5%
2.0%
1500
1536
1.5%
1.5%
1.0%
1000
1.1%
0.9%
0.9%
1.0%
0.7%
0.5%
806
0.5%
500
500
414
550
450
430
0.0%
203
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
Subvention à l'énergie
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Part de la subvention dans le PIB
-0.5%
Share in GDP (%)
Energy Subsidies has put
tremendous budgetary
pressure on government.
Energy supply & demand background
Share of subsidy in electricity cost
Electricity is among the
most heavily subsidized
energy.
In 2012 the share of the
subsidy was 49% of
electricity cost. In other
words, the State shares the
cost of kWh with the
consumer.
(TND/kwh)
300
Subsidy
Average selling price
250
49%
40%
200
39%
150
31%
100
50
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
Energy supply & demand background
Evolution of Bulding Electricity Consumption (GWh)
Increase of housing
electricity consumption
about 60% in 10 years
4100
Tertiairy
Housing
3400
2700
2000
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Energy supply & demand background
Refrigerator, TV and
lighting are the most
energy-consuming
equipments with a total
share of 79%
Structure of Electricity housing
consumption
Others
14%
The consumption of AC
equipment s is not
significant but its
contribution to the peak
load is very important.
x1000
Lighting
2004
2009
14716 17118
annual
growth
rate
household
equipment
rate
3,3%
100%
2279
2708
3,8%
96%
Refrigerator 1982
2364
3,9%
92%
TV
AC
202
437
23,2%
15%
WM
373
780
21,9%
50%
WM
3%
AC
4%
Refrigerator
38%
Lighting
18%
TV
23%
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Feasibility Study
Institutional and
Capability
Building
Implementation
and Promotion
Monitoring &
Evaluation
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Feasibility Study



1996-2000
Production and consumption analysis and study of prioritization of products
for labeling.
International best practices and experiences study.
Assessing the capacity to develop and implement a labeling program,
including:

Labeling programs policies and regulation;

Standards/specifications;

Stakeholders requirements and market needs;

Institutional and relevant agencies preparation;

Resources and capabilities, including funds, human resources, local
manufacturing and testing facilities.
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Identification of national execution and
implementation agencies & organizations
Institutional and Capacity Building
ANME (Cordination,
monitoring & Evaluation)
ODC (Consumer rights
Organization; NGO);
FEDELEC (Professional
organization,
communication,
information);
CETIME (Testing
facilities)
Ministry of Trade
(Manufacturers,
Importers & Retailers
Ministry of Industry
(Manufacturers)
INNORPI (Norms and
Standards )
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Institutional and Capacity Building

Implementation of testing facilities (CETIME) :

Refrigerator  2002;

AC equipement2008;

Lighting2010;

Testing protocol (INNORPI);

Training (all Stakeholders);

Develop testing capacity
Conducting pilot tests (60 refrigeration
equipments, 50 AC equipments).

Refrigerator  60 equipments;

AC  50 equipments;
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Implementation and Promotion

Energy Conservation Law (2004) :

Refrigerator  2004;

AC equipement2009;

Lighting being promulgated;

WM in development;
Implementation
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Implementation and Promotion

Training & information dissemination:

Manufacturers, importers;

Retailers support;

Trade inspectors;
Implementation
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Implementation and Promotion
MEPS
X
X
X
X
X
04/2009
07/2007
07/2006
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Implementation and Promotion
MEPS (Minimum Energy Performance
Standards)
X
X
X
X
X
01/2012
01/2011
01/2010
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Implementation and Promotion

Awareness & communication
campaign :
 All media (TV, radio,
newspapers)
 Mailing
 Flyers, Posters
 Field campaigns
 Meetings, seminars and
exhibitions
Promotion
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Monitoring, Evaluation and Revision

Monitoring
Labeling process monitoring
CETIME (testing)
Manufacturers
importers
Retailers
Ministry of
Trade
ANME
(Labeling Levels)
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Monitoring, Evaluation and Revision

Labeling performance monitoring
including display label quality,
number of applications /
manufacturers, number of products
models / types and production / sale
number of labeled products.
Monitoring
Share of equipement without label
90%
Refrigerator
80%
AC equipement
78%
70%
60%
60%
50%
48%
40%
30%
26%
20%
25%
17%
10%
0%
2009
2010
2013
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Monitoring, Evaluation and Revision

Evaluation
Market evaluation
Refrigerator
AC Equipment
80%
80%
2003
2007
2006
2013
70%
70%
60%
60%
50%
50%
40%
40%
30%
30%
20%
20%
10%
10%
2013
0%
0%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Steps of Energy Labeling & MEPS Programs
Monitoring, Evaluation and Revision

Evaluation
Market evaluation
Refrigerator
AC Equimpent
100%
100%
90%
90%
80%
80%
Class8
70%
Class8
70%
Class7
60%
Class6
100% Class5
50%
Class4
40%
Class3
30%
Class2
46%
Class1
20%
10%
Class7
60%
Class6
100%
50%
Class4
40%
Class3
Class2
30%
Class1
20%
18%
10%
10%
0%
2003
0%
2007
2013
Class5
2009
2013
Main results
Energy Saving Result (ktoe)
70
218
ktoe
60
• Energy
Saving
125
MTND
50
• Cost
Saving
40
46
MTND
30
• Subsidy
Saving
20
10
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
Refrigertor
AC Equipment
2010
2011
2012
Success Factors & Lessons Learned




A participatory multi-stakeholder approach is the most effective way of
insuring the success of the strategy elaboration and implementation
Control and market monitoring is an essential action to win consumer trust:
Ministry of Trade have conducted in 2013 a large campaign of market
surveillance to verify conformity of products tested against products
marketed
Communication is a powerful tool to promote high performance and efficient
technologies: ANME is developing a new communication strategy to promote
Energy Labeling Programs
Governments must create a win - win situation between the state and the
consumer: ANME is developing a mechanism to promote 1 million high
performance refrigerators (600.000 replacement & 400.000 new acquisition)
Thank you for your
attention
www.anme.nat.tn
[email protected]