Transcript Grid synchronization for power converters

Grid synchronization for power converters
Grid synchronization for power
converters
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Outline
•
•
•
•
Grid requirements for DG inverters
PLL Basics, PLL in power systems
Design of PLL
PLL for single-phase systems
– Methods to create the orthogonal component
– Methods using adaptive filters
• PLL for three-phase systems
• Conclusions
• Reference papers
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Grid
Distrurbances
Grid disturbances are not
at all a new issue, and
the utilities are aware of
them. However, they
have to take a new look
because of the rapidly
changing customers’
needs and the nature of
loads (CIGRE WG14-31,
1999)
Thomsen,1999; CIGRE WG14-31, 1999
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Grid requirements for DG inverters
The following conditions should be met, with voltages in RMS and
measured at the point of utility connection.
When the utility frequency is outside the range of +/- 1 Hz the inverter
should cease to energize the utility line within 0.2 seconds.
The PV system shall have an average lagging power factor greater
than 0,9 when the output is greater than 50% rated.
Thus the grid voltage and frequency should be
estimated and monitored fast and accurate enough in
order to cope with the standard
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Grid synchronization requirements
A good synchronization of the current with the grid voltage is
necessary as:
 the standards require a high power factor (> 0.9)
 a ”clean” reference for the current is necesarry in order to cope with the
harmonic requirements of grid standards and codes
 grid connection transients needs to be minimized in order not to trip the
inverter
 Distributed Generation systems of higher power have also requirements in
terms of voltage support or reactive power injection capability and of
frequency support or active power droop
 Micro-grid distributed generation systems have wider range of voltage and
frequency and the estimated grid voltage parameters are often involved in
control loops
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Grid synchronization options and challenges
There are two basical synchronization methods:
 Filtered Zero Cross Detection (ZCD)
 PLL
Single-phase systems:
The classical solution for single-phase systems was Filtered ZCD as for the PLL
two orthogonal voltages are required.
The trend now is to use the PLL technique also by creating ”virtual”
orthogonal components using different techniques!
Three-phase systems:
 Three-phase PLL should deal with unbalnace hence with negative sequence
 Moreover in three-phase systems dynamics would be better if synchronizing
to all three phase voltages, i.e. based on space vectors rather then on a scalar
voltage
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Zero Cross Detection (ZCD) circuits
Dual point interpolation circuit
Resistive feedback hysteresis
circuit
Dynamic hysteresis comparator
circuit
Source: R.W. Wall, “Simple methods for detecting
zero crossing,” IEEE IECON’03, pp. 2477-2481
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Filtered Zero Cross Detection (ZCD) based
monitoring and synchronization

v
v fil
uk
T
RST
v
Filter
v fil



2
x
1
2
f
f min
Vmax
x
2
dt
RMS CALC

sin
I
ZCD
f max
1

T


V
Vmin







I
Vmax
V
f max
f min
f
OF/UF
TRIP
Vmin
OV/UV


Filtering introduces delay. There are digital predictive FIR filters without
delay bu with high complexity (very high order!)
The RMS voltage and frequency are calculated once in a period  poor
detection of changes (sags, dips, etc.)
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
PLL basis
Basic idea of synchronization based on a phase-locked loop:



Phase-locked technology is broadly used in military, aerospace, consumer electronics systems
where some kind of feedback is used to synchronize some local periodic event with some
recognizable external event
Many biological processes are synchronized to environmental events. Actually, most of us
schedule our daily activities phase-locking timing information supplied by a clock.
A grid connected power converter should phase-lock its internal oscillator to the grid voltage
(or current), i.e., an amplitude and phase coherent internal signal should be generated.
200
v [V]
100
0
v
in
-100
-200
Event based synchronization
(simple, discontinuous, …)
Marco Liserre
Phase-locked synchronization
(continuous, predictive,…)
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
PLL basis
Basic blocks:

Phase Detector (PD). This block generates an output signal proportional to the phase
difference between its two input signals. Depending on the type of PD, high frequency ac
components appear together the dc phase difference signal.

Loop Filter (LF). This block exhibits low pass characteristic and filters out the high frequency ac
components from the PD output. Typically this is a 1-st order LPF or PI controller.

Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO). This block generates at its output an ac signal whose
frequency varies respect a central frequency as a function of the input voltage.
v
Marco Liserre
Phase
Detector
vd
Loop
Filter
vf
Voltage
Controlled
Oscillator
v
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
PLL in power systems
In 1968 Ainsworth proposed to use a voltage
controlled oscillator (VCO) inside the control loop
of a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC)
transmission system to deal with the novel, at that
T1
time, harmonic instability problem.
LS
ia
va
RL
T3
LL
T5
vb
vdc
E
+
-
vc
Subsequently, analog phase locked
loops (PLL) were proposed to be used as
measurement blocks, which provide frequency
adaptation in motor drives.
Marco Liserre
T4
T6
T2
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Phase Locked Loop tuning
PD
A sin  int  in 

LF
kd
vd
k p  ki 
se
VCO

cos( x)


ko
c
vin  A sin  ωint  in 
Reference:
vVCO  cos  ωct  out 
VCO output:
  c t  ko  se dt  out  ko  se dt
VCO angle:
Small signal
analysis:
PD/Mixer output: vd  Akd sin  ωint  in  cos  ωct  out  
Marco Liserre
Akd
sin  2int  in  out   sin  in  out  ,
2 
Akd
sin  2  int , in     in  out  
v

sin  in  out    in  out 
d
2 
vd 
if
ωc  in, then
if
in  out, then
The average value is
Akd
sin   in  c  t  in  out   sin   in  c  t  in  out  
2 
vd 
Akd
 in  out 
2
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Phase Locked Loop tuning
assuming
LF - HPI
PD
in

km
vd

1  se
k p 1 

 Ti s 
ko  1
VCO
ko
1
s
out
that can be written as
ts 
then
H  (s) 
out ( s)
2n s  n2
H  ( s) 

in ( s) s 2  2n s  n2
km  1
out ( s)

in ( s)
with  
n
kps 
s2  k p s 
kp
Ti
kp
Ti
;

kp
Ti
k pTi
2
4.6
n
The PLL can be tuned as function of the
damping and of the settling time
ts 2
9.2
kp 
; Ti 
ts
2.3
tr 
Marco Liserre
1.8
n
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Key parameters of the PLL
The hold range DH is the frequency range at which a PLL is able to maintain lock statically.

DH  ko km LF (0)
For the PI, LF(0)=∞ and the hold range is only limited by the frequency range of the VCO
The pull-in range DP is the frequency range at which a PLL will always became locked, but
the process can become rather slow. For the PI loop filter this range trends to infinite.

400
Pull-in time:
 [rad/s]
300
200
100
2 Din2
TP 
16 3n
0
80
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1.5
2
2.5
t [s]
 [rad]
6
4
2
0
0

0.5
t [s]
The lock range DL is the frequency range within which a PLL locks within one-single beat
note between the reference frequency and the output frequency.
DL  2n  2
Marco Liserre
1
kp
Ti
Lock-in time: TL 
2
n
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Phase Locked Loop: the need of the orthogonal
component
Akd
sin  2int  in  out   sin  in  out  
2 
To eliminate the 2° harmonic oscillation from
and obtain
Akd
sin  in  out   it should be considered that
2 
sin  in - out   sin in cos out  cos in sin out
cos
Vsin  int  in 
X
Vsin  in - out 
+
-
Vcos  int  in 

1 
K p 1 

 sTi 
1
s
++
int  out
in
X
sin
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Park transformation in the PD
Park transformation:
v 
 sin(in ) 
v   V 

 cos(in ) 
 
vd   cos(out ) sin(out )  v 
v   
 
 q    sin(out ) cos(out )   v 
 sin  in  cos  out   cos  in  sin  out  
 sin  in  out  
vd 
 V 

v   V 

sin

sin


cos

cos









in
out
in
out 
 q

  cos  in  out  
Assuming in=out :
 sin  in  out  
vd 

v   V 

cos





in
out 
 q

vin
Quadrature
Signal
Generator
q
vd

v
dq
vq
v  V sin(in )
v
LF
PD
v


1  vf
k p 1 

 Ti s 
c
v
d
VCO
1
s
out
vq
v
out

vd
in
out
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Park transformation in the PD
PI on vd
 q
LF
PD
v
vin
Quadrature
Signal
Generator
vd

1  vf
k p 1 

 Ti s 
c

v
dq
out
VCO
1
s
out  in
v  V sin(in ) ; vd  0
out  0
t0
d

vq   v
in  0
PI on vq
t0
v
PD
v
vin
Quadrature
Signal
Generator

v
dq
vd  v

LF
vq
out
VCO

1  vf
k p 1 

 Ti s 
c
1
s
out  in 

2
v  V sin(in ) ; vq  0
q

out  
From here on, it will be considered:
vin  v  V sin  in 
Therefore:
Marco Liserre
and PI on vq,, i.e.,
out  in and vd  v  V
vq  0
in  0
t0

2 t0
v
d
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Methods to create the orthogonal component
 Transport Delay T/4
LF
PD
vin
v
vd

Delay
T/4
v
dq
vq

1  se
k p 1 

Ti s 

c
VCO
1
s

vin

 The transport delay block is easily implemented through the use of a first-in-first-out
(FIFO) buffer, with size set to one fourth the number of samples contained in one
cycle of the fundamental frequency.
 This method works fine for fixed grid frequency. If the grid frequency is changing
with for ex +/-1 Hz, then the PLL will produce an error
 If input voltage consists of several frequency components, orthogonal signals
generation will produce errors because each of the components should be delayed
one fourth of its fundamental period.
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Methods to create the orthogonal component
 Inverse Park Transformation
LF
PD
vin
v
vd

1  se
k p 1 

Ti s 

c

v
dq
vq
VCO
1
s

vin

v
v

dq
vd
LPF
vq
LPF
 A single phase voltage (v) and an internally generated signal (v’) are used as inputs to a Park
transformation block (αβ-dq). The d axis output of the Park transformation is used in a control loop to
obtain phase and frequency information of the input signal.
 v’ is obtained through the use of an inverse Park transformation, where the inputs are the d and qaxis outputs of the Park transformation (dq-αβ). fed through first-order low pass filters.
 Although the algorithm of the PLL based on the inverse Park transformation is easily implemented,
requiring only an inverse Park and two first-order low-pass filters
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Methods to create the orthogonal component
 Second Order Generalized Integrator
q



S ( s) 
SOGI
d
s 
( s)  2
f
s   2
q
 2
T (s)  (s)  2
f
s   2
v
k
q v
-20
-40




v
45
0
-45
-90
10
20
-1
10
0
1
10
10
Frequency (Hz)
2
10
3
10
4
Q( )
0
-20
-40
-60
k=0.1
k=1
k=4
0
Phase (deg)
v
k s
D( s)  ( s)  2
v
s  k s   2
qv
k  2
Q(s) 
( s)  2
v
s  k s   2
k=0.1
k=1
k=4
90
SOGI
Marco Liserre
D( )
0
-60
Phase (deg)

d
Magnitude (dB)
f
Magnitude (dB)
20
-45
-90
-135
-180
10
-1
10
0
1
10
10
Frequency (Hz)
2
10
3
10
4
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Methods using adaptive filters
 Adaptive Notch Filter (ANF)
vout
s 2   2
ANF ( s ) 
(s)  2
vin
s  ks   2
OSCILLATOR

cos
vin

v


k
vout
 vout=0 when:
   t    
k
 vout can not be directly used as
PD in the PLL
sin
vin  A cos t  in 
OSCILLATOR

cos
vin
Marco Liserre
v

 vout=0 when:
   t  in
k
vout
 vout can be used as PD in the
PLL
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Methods using adaptive filters
 ANF-based PLL
VCO
PD
cos
1
s
v
vin
k
LF
vd
se
kc
c
Adaptive Notch Filter

1
s
 Very sensible to frequency variation
 ANF+PLL  EPLL
cos
vin
v
1
s
k
Adaptive Notch Filter
LF
PD
vd
VCO

1  se
k p 1 

 Ti s 
c
1
s

 sin
Conventional PLL structure
Combination of an ANF with a
conventional PLL gives rise to the
Enhanced PLL (EPLL)
Marco Liserre
 More robust
 Faster dynamic response
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Methods using adaptive filters
 Enhanced PLL (EPLL)
v
v
v
V( )

k
v
v’
ABPF
PD
 ff
LF
vd
PI
ju

 sin

cos

VCO
BPAF
v
+
LP
e
×
-
u
Kp
VCO
+
+
+
90°
Ki
×
1
s Δω
1
s
+
θ
ω0
sin
K
y
1
s
Marco Liserre
×
A
Original structure of the EPLL
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Methods using adaptive filters
 SOGI-PLL
Adaptive band-pass filter:
ABPF ( s )  1  ANF ( s ) 
v
ks
(s)  2
v
s  ks   2
Damping factor is a function of
the detected frequency value
Second order generalized integrator follower:
If ’ can change, SOGI follower can be seen
as an adaptive band-pass filter with damping
factor set by k and unitary gain
v
k s
D( s)  ( s)  2
v
s  k s   2
v
v

k
qv
 As in the EPLL, a standard PLL can be
used to detect grid frequency and angle
 ju is 90º-leading v’ when the PLL is
synchronized in steady state
 ju=-qu and qu  qv’
 It seems intuitive to use -qu (instead ju) as
the feedback signal for the PD of the PLL


PD
v
v
SOGI
VCO
LF

PI
 ff
ju


 sin
Conventional PLL structure
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Methods using adaptive filters
 SOGI-based Frequency Locked Loop (SOGI-FLL)
v
v

k
qv
1
Marco Liserre
 Attenuates high-order harmonics of the grid
voltage.
FLL


 Is frequency-adaptive by using a FLL and not a
PLL.
 Is highly robust in front of transient events
since grid frequency is more stable than voltage
phase-angle.

qv
v
SOGI
v
 Does not need any trigonometric function since
neither synchronous reference frame nor voltage
controlled oscillator are used in its algorithm.

 ff
 Entails light computational burden, using only
five integrators for detection of both sequence
components.
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Three-phase grid synchronization
Distorted and unbalanced voltage vector

b

VS
vS 

VS1

VS5

a
V S5
VS1   VSn   2VS1VSn cosn  1t 
2
2
 VSn sin n  1t  
  t  tan 1  1

n


V

V
cos
n

1

t
 S

 
S
V S1
c
Neither constant amplitude nor
rotation speed

b

VS1
V S1
V S1

VS1
VS1  V S1
V S1  V S1

VS
t 
t

a
v S  (VS1 )2  (VS1 )2  2VS1VS1 cos(2 t   1 )
 VS1 sin(2 t   1 ) 
   t  tan  1
1
1 
V

V
cos(

2

t


)
S
 S
1
c
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Characterization of voltage dips
 Phase-voltages from
characteristic parameters
Type C
Type D
VSa  F
VSa  V
VSb   12 F 
3
2
jV
VSb   12 V 
3
2
jF
VSb   12 F 
3
2
jV
VSb   12 V 
3
2
jF
Type D
Type C

VS1  12 V  F
 Sequence components from
characteristic parameters
1.5

VS1   12 V  F
V+=0.61589<-32.0197 ;V-=0.16411<108.5995

VS1  12
1.5
V=0.5<-20 ;F=0.75<-40
V+=0.61589<-32.0197 ;V-=0.16411<108.5995
V=0.5<-20 ;F=0.75<-40
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0
-0.5
-0.5
-0.5
-1
-1
-1
-1.5
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
t [s]
Marco Liserre
0.08
0.1
-1.5
0
V+=0.61589<-32.0197 ;V-=0.16411<108.5995

0
v

v [pu]
1
[pu]
1
0
 
V  F 
VS1  12 V  F
1.5
V=0.5<-20 ;F=0.75<-40
vabc [pu]

0.02
0.04
0.06
t [s]
0.08
0.1
-1.5
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
v [pu]
0.5
1
1.5
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Three-phase grid synchronization
Three-phase Synchronous Reference Frame PLL
vSa
vSb
v Sc
T 
dq
vSd  vˆ S
vSd
vSq
̂
PI
ˆ
150
1
s
ˆ
vS
( dq )
1
ˆ


 ˆ) 
vSd 
1 cos( t   )
1 cos(  t  
    VS 

V
 S 

1
ˆ
ˆ
 vSq 
 sin( t   ) 
 sin( t     ) 
7
vS
100
150
6
100
5
Balanced
voltage
50
vSd  v S
4
0
50
vSq  0
3
-50
ˆ   t
2
-100
0
1
-150
0
-50
0
150
7
150
100
vS
6
ˆ
75
100
50
4
50
0
vSd  v S
3
-50
Marco Liserre
50
t [ms]
100
5
Unbalanced
voltage
25
2
-100
1
-150
0
t
0
vSq  0
-50
0
25
50
t [ms]
75
100
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Three-phase grid synchronization
Three-phase Synchronous Reference Frame PLL
vSa
vSb
v Sc
T 
dq
vSd  vˆ S
vSd
vSq
̂
PI
1
s
ˆ
Near of synchronization:  '  t
ˆ
sin(t   ')  t   '
vS
( dq )


VS1
P( s ) 
*
vSq
1
̂
1
s
ˆ
c  VS1ki
vS
 1 
cos(2t ) 
 VS1 
 VS1 


t   '
 sin(2t ) 
The SRF is not able to track instantaneous evolution
of the voltage vector when the PLL bandwidth is low
150
7
150
t
6
150
vˆ S1
100
100
5
50
50
4
50
0
3
-50
t   '  2t


V 1
vSq  VS1 t  S1 sin(2t )   '  VS1    '
VS


1
V
  t  S1 sin(2t )
VS
ˆ
2c s  c 2
( s)  2

s  2c s  c 2
k p VS1

2 ki
100
k
kp  i
s
cos(t   ')  1
vSq
2
-100
1
-150
Marco Liserre
0
vSd
0
-50
0
ˆ   t
-100
-50
-150
0
25
50
t [ms]
75
100
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Three-phase grid synchronization
Three-phase Synchronous Reference Frame PLL
7
150
vS
150
150
vSd
6
100
100
vˆ S1
100
5
50
50
vSq
4
50
0
0
3
-50
-50
2
-100
1
-150
0
0
-100
-50
-150
0
25
50
t [ms]
75
100
Setting a low PLL bandwidth and using a low-pass filter it is possible to obtain a
reasonable approximation of the positive sequence voltage but the dynamic is too slow.
Advanced filtering strategies can be used to cancel out the double frequency oscillation
keeping high locking dynamics, e.g., a repetitive controller based on a DFT algorithm.
Additional improvements are added to these filters to make them frequency adaptive.
vSa
vSb
v Sc
T 
dq
ˆ
Marco Liserre
vSd
vSd  vˆ S
vSq
PI
Repetitive
controller
̂
1
s
ˆ
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Three-phase grid synchronization
Decoupled Doubled SRF-PLL. Decoupling
q 1 
q 1
̂
̂ v
1
S



 t   1
ˆ
ˆ

( dq 1 )
Near of synchronization:  '  t
d 1
vS
1
 1 
1  cos( 2 t   ) 
V 

V
ˆ  S  sin(2 t   1 ) 
 t   
vS
1
cos(2 t ) 
1  cos( ) 
V 
  VS 
1 
 sin(2 t ) 
 sin( ) 
( dq 1 )
vSq m
vSd m
dm
vSd n d n
d 1
̂
v S1
vS
1
ˆ


vSd 1 
 ˆ) 
1 cos( t   )
1 cos(  t  



  VS 

  Tdq1   v S  VS 
1
( )
 vSq1  
 sin( t  ˆ) 
 sin( t    ˆ) 
( dq 1 )
v S ̂
t
vS
cos( t  ˆ) 
cos( t   1  ˆ) 
vSd 1 

1

1

  VS 

  Tdq1   v S  VS 
1
v
ˆ
ˆ
1
(

)
 Sq 
 sin( t   ) 
 sin( t     ) 
qm
vSq n q n
*
d n* vSd n
*
q n* vSq
n
( dq 1 )
1
S
1
S
This terms act as
interferences on
the SRF dqn
rotating at n
frequency and
viceversa
Generic decoupling cell:
vSd n  VSn cos( n ) 
 cos((n  m)t ) 
 sin((n  m)t ) 
 VSm cos( m ) 
 VSm sin( m ) 
v    n


n 
 Sqn  VS sin( ) 
  sin((n  m)t ) 
cos((n  m)t ) 
cos
ˆ
Marco Liserre
ˆ
sin
n-m
n
DC  
m
vSd m  VSm cos( m ) 
n
n cos((n  m)t ) 
n
n   sin((n  m)t ) 

V
cos(

)

V
sin(

)
v    m

S
S
 sin((n  m)t ) 
.
m


 cos((n  m)t ) 
 Sqm  VS sin( ) 
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Three-phase grid synchronization
Decoupled Doubled SRF-PLL
PLL input normalization
* 
*
vSq
1
v Sd 1
T  v
y
dq
1
Sq 1
.
vS
abc 
d
q
1
ˆ
vS
T 
1
vq
2
q
vSq1
*
Sd 1
v
  1 1*
DC   d
*
vSq
1
  1
1*
1 q
d 1 q
k p  ki  ̂
f
LPF
LPF

ˆ
vSd 1  vˆ S1
v Sq 1
 
T 
dq 1
vSd 1
vSq 1
d
q
1
1
ˆ
Marco Liserre
v v
2
d
d
1
q
1
d
  1
DC   q
  1
1*
*
vSd
1
*
vSq
1
1*
LPF
v Sd 1
v Sq 1
LPF
f
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Conclusions








Marco Liserre
PLL is a very useful method that enable the grid inverters to:
 Create a "clean" current reference synchronized with the grid
 Comply with the grid monitoring standards
The PLL generate is able to track the frequency and phase of the input
signal in a designed settling time
By setting a higher settling time a "filtering" effect can be achieved in order
to obtain a "clean" reference even with a polluted grid.
Some PLLs need two signals in quadrature at the input.
For single-phase systems as there is only one signal available, the
orthogonal signal needs to be created artificially.
Transport Delay, Inverse Park Transformation, or Second Order
Generalized Integrators are some the methods used for quadrature signal
generation.
Adaptive notch filters canceling fundamental utility frequency are used as
phase detectors in PLLs
FLL based on a SOGI is a very effective method for single phase
synchronization
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
References
1. J. D. Ainsworth, “The phase-locked oscillator-a new control system for controlled static
convertors,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 859-865,
Mar. 1968.
2. G. C. Hsieh, J. C. Hung, Phase-locked loop techniques – A survey, IEEE Trans. On Ind.
Electronics, vol.43, pp.609-615, Dec.1996.
3. F. M. Gardner, Phase Lock Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1979.
4. L. D. Zhang, M. H. J. Bollen Characteristic of voltage dips (sags) in power systems, IEEE Trans.
Power Delivery, vol.15, pp.827-832, April 2000.
5. F. Blaabjerg, R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, and A. V. Timbus, “Overview of Control and Grid
Synchronization for Distributed Power Generation Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Ind. Electronics, Vol.
53, Oct. 2006 Page(s):1398 – 1409
6. M. K. Ghartemani, M.R. Iravani, “A method for synchronization of power electronic converters in
polluted and variable-frequency environments,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 19, pp. 12631270, Aug. 2004.
7. M.K. Ghartemani, M.R. Iravani, “A Method for Synchronization of Power Electronic Converters in
Polluted and Variable-Frequency Environments,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 19, Aug. 2004,
pp. 1263-1270.
8. H.-S. Song and K. Nam, “Dual current control scheme for PWM converter under unbalanced input
voltage conditions,” IEEE Trans. On Industrial Electronics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 953–959, 1999.
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
References
1. P. Rodríguez, A. Luna, I. Candela, R. Teodorescu, and F. Blaabjerg, “Grid Synchronization of
Power Converters using Multiple Second Order Generalized Integrators,” IECON’08, Nov.
2008.
2. P. Rodríguez, J. Pou, J. Bergas, J.I. Candela, R. Burgos and D. Boroyevich, “Decoupled
Double Synchronous Reference Frame PLL for Power Converters Control,” IEEE Trans. on
Power Electronics, March 2007.
3. P. Rodriguez, R. Teodorescu, R.; I. Candela, I.; A.V. Timbus, M. Liserre, F. Blaabjerg, “New
Positive-sequence Voltage Detector for Grid Synchronization of Power Converters under
Faulty Grid Conditions,” PESC '06, June 2006.
4. M Ciubotaru, Teodorescu, R., Blaabjerg, F., “A New Single-Phase PLL Structure Based on
Second Order Generalized Integrator”, PESC’06, June 2006.
5. P. Rodríguez, A. Luna, M. Ciobotaru, R. Teodorescu, and F. Blaabjerg, “Advanced Grid
Synchronization System for Power Converters under Unbalanced and Distorted Operating
Conditions,” IECON’06, Nov. 2006.
6. S.-K. Chung, “Phase-Locked Loop for grid-connected three-phase power conversion
systems,” IEE Proceedings on Electronic Power Applications, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 213–219,
2000.
7. Francisco Daniel Freijedo Fernández, “Contributions to Grid-Synchronization Techniques for
Power Electronic Converters”, PhD Thesis, Vigo University, Spain, 2009
Marco Liserre
[email protected]
Grid synchronization for power converters
Acknowledgment
Part of the material is or was included in the present and/or past editions
of the
“Industrial/Ph.D. Course in Power Electronics for Renewable Energy
Systems – in theory and practice”
Speakers: R. Teodorescu, P. Rodriguez, M. Liserre, J. M. Guerrero,
Place: Aalborg University, Denmark
The course is held twice (May and November) every year
Marco Liserre
[email protected]