Transcript Title here

Open Access, Repositories and Research
Assessment: Enlighten-ing Lessons
William J Nixon, Service Development Manager (Enlighten)
UKSG Breakout Sessions (Group A)
April 2011
University of Glasgow [Screenshot]
University Statement – April 2006
“Glasgow University, as a signatory of the
Scottish Open Access Declaration, strongly
encourages authors at Glasgow University to
deposit copies of their published work into
the University's Institutional
Repository……….The Repository is a freely
available database which anyone in the
world can access and is intended to be a
showcase of the research undertaken at the
University.”
http://www.lib.gla.ac.uk/enlighten/statement.html
University Publications Policy – June 2008
The objectives of this policy are:
• To increase the visibility of research
publications produced by staff employed by
or associated with the University of Glasgow
• To ensure that research outputs are
prepared and curated in a way which helps
maximise the value that they have for the
university in terms of the external use of
bibliometric data e.g. league tables, post2008 RAE
http://www.lib.gla.ac.uk/enlighten/publicationspolicy/
University Library [Screenshot]
The Library (in Figures) in 2010
• Visits to the library
– 1.562 million
• Database searches completed
– 2.554 million
• Full-text articles from our e-journals downloaded
– 2.443 million
• Photocopied pages in the library
– 914, 603 pages
• Physical items borrowed from the library
– 850,528
• Sections or chapters from our e-books requested
– 725,759
• Sheets printed from computers in the library
– 3.608 million
Enlighten Homepage
EPrints Record with Funder [Screenshot]
Enlighten Development [Screenshot]
Evolution of Enlighten
Enlighten:
Institutional
Repository
- Voluntary Deposit
- Limited Item Types
- Mostly Full Text
–
Publications
Policy
JUNE 2008
Enlighten:
Embedded
Institutional
Repository
- Mandatory Deposit
- Wide Range of Item
Types
- Mostly Metadata
2001-
JISC Projects: DAEDALUS to Enrich and Enquire
2010-
Enlighten Snapshot
•
•
•
•
15,000 User records
39,099 Publication records to date
3,600+ Full text papers
530% increase in records
(Dec 2009 to Dec 2010)
• Data Matching exercise with Thomson
Reuters (InCites)
Google Analytics
Silos are the past…
Photo by docsearls on Flickr - used under a Creative Commons licence
Embedded Repositories are the future
SwordAPP
LDAP
Embedding (and integrating) is about…
• Being stitched into the fabric of the institution
– Culturally, Technically ,Holistically
• Adding Value [for the]
– Researcher, Funder(s), Institution , UK Plc
• Re-use
– REF, Research Profiles, Interoperability,
crosswalks and metadata schema
• Reducing Duplication
– Ingest, workflows, reporting
• Exploiting new opportunities
– Data mining, business intelligence, KPI’s,
Analytics, “stickiness”, visibility
Embedding and Repository Questions
• How joined up/embedded is your [Research]
repository?
• Who are your partners?
• What are your barriers?
• Do you have an “institutional repository” or a
repository at your institution?
An Institutional Exemplar – 3 P’s
People
Processes
Policies
People: Partnerships
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Academic staff
Departmental administrators
University Library
IT Services
Corporate Communications
Research and Enterprise
Human Resources
Archives
“No Repository is an island.”
Processes: Institutional System integration
• Increasing deposits with our institutional
login with (GUID)
• Providing a new Glasgow Author browse
view
• Surfacing Funder data (from our Research
System)
• Identifying and implementing workflows with
colleges and schools
• Collecting Output, Impact and Esteem data
(REF Preparation)
Browse by Glasgow Author [Screenshot]
Staff A to Z with Publications [Screenshot]
Linking Outputs to Awards [Screenshot]
Browse by Research Funder Name [Screenshot]
Mini-REF (Oct-Dec 2010)
• Internal REF exercise
• Enlighten being used as the platform to carry
out this exercise
• Using locally modified version of the RAE
add-on software developed by the University
of Southampton for RAE 2008
• Has significantly increased staff engagement
with Enlighten
• 200+ staff self-deposited records
• 4000+ new records added
MiniREF Selections [Screenshot]
MiniREF Selection Details [Screenshot]
Impact and Esteem [Screenshot]
Impact and Esteem 2 [Screenshot]
REF Reporting [Screenshot]
MiniREF Lessons
• Your publications data can never be comprehensive
enough in advance of an exercise like this
• Ensure you are ready to deal with the volume of
queries, updates and additional publications which the
exercise will elicit
• Administration features including the opportunity to
"impersonate" users (to update records on their
behalf) and to run various reports are absolutely vital
for managing returns and gauging progress
• Learn lessons, take onboard feedback and be
flexible/nimble enough to make changes to the
system and workflows
Using publications data for research management
• University now has comprehensive record of
its publications
• Senior management interest in re-using and
analysing this data
• Publication lists pulled from Enlighten to prepopulate Professorial Performance and
Development Review forms
• Comparison of University’s publications with
ERA (Excellence in Research for Australia)
journal rankings list
Find Out More
• Me
[email protected]
@williamjnixon
• Enlighten
http://eprints.gla.ac.uk
• Web 2.0 Blog and Twitter
http://enlightenrepository.wordpress.com
• http://researchoutcomes.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/enlightenpapers