6888960 bytes - Clark County MeteoStar Monitoring web page

Download Report

Transcript 6888960 bytes - Clark County MeteoStar Monitoring web page

LEADS/EMS
OVERVIEW
WHAT IS LEADS
• Leading Environmental Analysis and Display System
• Development Began At Lockheed In Late 1989 To Produce A
New Commercial Weather Analysis Product
• LEADS Grew Out Of Two Military Weather Contracts
– TESS(3) -- A Navy Program Which Uses Surface Observations And
Numerical Forecast Models To Provide Tactical Weather Forecasts For
Carrier Fleets
– Mark IVB -- An Air Force Program Which Uses Satellite Imagery And
Analysis Tools To Provide Long-Range Strategic Forecasts
• In 1994 Lockheed Was Brought Under Contract With TCEQ To
Add Pollution
• In 1997 Information Processing Systems (IPS) Acquired The
MeteoStar Product Line
1-3
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
SYSTEM CAPABILITIES
• Near Real-time Data Acquisition
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
•
•
•
•
Pollution Sensor Data
Water Probe Data
Conventional Meteorological Surface Data
Weather Satellite Imagery (Geostationary)
Automated Gas Chromatograph (AutoGC)
Upper Air Data
Radar Profiler And Acoustic Sounder
Visualization
Long-term Data Archival
EPA Reporting
Analysis
– Ozone Action Day Prediction
– Transport Studies
– Pollution Source Determination
1-4
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
LEADS DATA PYRAMID
Data
Customers
Manual Validation Editor
Data Report Web Pages
EPA AQS Submittal
Policy Makers
Public
Review & Validate
Data
Data Presentation & Analysis
AIRNow
Web Pages
Automatic QA/QC
Data Collection
EMS Configuration
LEADS/EMS System
1-5
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
SYSTEM INTEGRATION
• The Entire Data Collection System Is Closely Integrated
• The Datalogger And Automatic Gas Calibrator Communicate
With Each Other Via A Serial Interface
– The Interface Was Completely Defined By IPS
– This Interface Results In Preliminary Data Flagging At The Monitoring Site
Based On What The Calibrator Is Doing
• The MeteoStar LEADS Software That Collects Data From The
Datalogger Uses The Native Datalogger Computer-To-Computer
Language (cc-sail)
• The Datalogger Keeps Track Of Which Data Records Have Been
Retrieved
– Simplifies Retrieval Software
– Retrieval Software Queries Datalogger For Latest Unsent Data Records
– Data Collection Is Very Forgiving Of Missed Phone Calls, Busy Signals,
Network Outages, Etc.
1-6
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
DEFINITION OF A SITE
• A Monitoring Site Is Associated With A Fixed Location
• LEADS/EMS Uses A Nine-Digit Number To Uniquely Identify
Each Monitoring Site
– These Are Known As EPA Site Numbers Or AQS Numbers Or AIRS
Numbers
– The First Two Digits Identify The State And The Next Three Identify The
County Where The Site Is Located; The Last Four Are Assigned By The
Monitoring Entity And Are Often Not Unique Across A Network
– The EPA Has Tables Of All States And Counties
• At Each Monitoring Site, There Can Be One Or More Data
Loggers
• Each Data Logger Requires A Unique Identifier
– This Is The CAMS (Continuous Ambient Monitoring Station) Number
– This Is An informal Site Identifier
– There Can Be A Many-To-One Mapping Of CAMS To EPA Sites
1-7
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
POLLUTION DATA COLLECTION
• LEADS Uses A Multi-Tier Data Collection System
– Reduces Load On Any Single Computer
– Able To Rapidly Reconfigure the Communications Network In The Event Of A
Hardware Failure
– Multi-Stage Archival Of Raw Measurements
– Possible To Retrieve Data From Any Of The Archive Locations And
Reintroduce It Into The System
• The Datalogger Installed At Each Site Is Capable Of Storing One
To Three Weeks Of Data Based On Number Of Instruments
• The Comms Front-End Processor Communicates With The
Dataloggers And Retrieves Data From Them
– Preliminary Data Checks Are Performed
– The CFEP Forwards Collected Data To The Main Or Central Processor
– The CFEP Computers Store Three Months Of Data
• Once Data Arrives At The Central Processor, It Is Decoded,
Checked For Errors, Processed And Stored In A Database
1-8
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
GETTING DATA FROM THE SITES
• Monitoring Sites Are Serviced By The CFEP
• Communications Is A Balance Of Cost And Data Retrieval
– MeteoStar LEADS Nominally Collects Data From Every Site In The
System Every 15 Minutes
– That Means 96 Connections To Every Site Each Day
– For IDEM, Most Sites Are Connected Via Aircards
• Data Is Generally Available Within 20 - 22 Minutes From The
Time It Is Collected (Based On A 15-Minute Comms Cycle)
• Data Generally Made Available To The Public Within An Hour
• Public Data Has Gone Through Automatic QA/QC Checks,
But May Change Later Based On Human Review
1-9
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
DATA STORAGE
• The LEADS/EMS Data Base Uses A Flat, Packed-Binary
Structure
• There Are Tables For Site Definitions, Parameter Definitions,
Etc.
• The Binary Data Files Are Physically Segregated By Date And
Monitoring Site
• Each Binary Data File Contains All The Measurements From A
Monitoring Site For A Specific Day
• There Are Five Elements That Are Used To Construct A Unique
Key For Data Storage And Retrieval
–
–
–
–
–
Date The Sample Was Collected (In UTC)
Time The Sample Was Collected (In UTC)
The AQS Number
A Five-Digit Parameter Identifier
The Parameter Occurrence Code (POC)
1 - 10
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
LEADS QA/QC PHILOSOPHY
• Standardize Data Handling
– Insure Consistency Across The Entire Network
– Minimize Subjective Data Quality Judgements
• Automate As Much As Possible
– Instrument Calibrations
– Periodic Instrument Challenges
– Data Quality Flagging
• Rigorously Check The Instruments In Each Station And The
Calibration System
– Perform Automatic Instrument Challenges On A Schedule
– Augment With Periodic Station Visits To Perform Independent Audits
• Provide A Set Of Tools For Operators, Validators, And Other
Data Customers To View Not Only The Data But QA/QC
Information And System Performance As Well
1 - 11
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
LEADS QA/QC IMPLEMENTATION
• TCEQ, IPS, Coastal (Datalogger), And Dasibi (Gas Calibrator)
Developed Interfaces Between The Various Components
And Software
– The Gas Calibrator Communicates Its Status To The Datalogger Which
In Turn Sets The Initial Data Quality Flag
– IPS-Developed Software Examines The Flags Coming From The
Datalogger And Determines Whether Or Not To Interpret The Data As
Ambient Or Some Type Of Calibration Or Instrument Challenge
• MeteoStar LEADS Uses Established Methods For
Challenging The Various Instruments
–
–
–
–
Five-Point Calibration
Three-Point Span Check
Span-Zero Check
Limit Checks
• Your Existing Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) Will
Most Likely Need To Be Updated To Incorporate LEADS
1 - 12
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
OTHER QA/QC CONSIDERATIONS
• The Introduction Of LEADS Will Not Affect Some Things
–
–
–
–
–
Documentation Of Procedures And Processes
Traceability Of Measurements Back To A Basic Standard
Independent Instrument Calibration And Certification
Independent Station Audits
Instrument Maintenance And Upkeep Procedures
• Major Impacts Of LEADS
–
–
–
–
Ability To Expand Monitoring Network Without Increase In Manpower
Higher Data Return
High Confidence Level In Quality Of Data
Ability To Rapidly Furnish Data To The General Public
1 - 13
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
QUALITY CHECKS
• There Are Several Types Of Automatic Quality Checks
• Calibration Sequences Are Run Periodically Or When
Equipment Is Changed To Establish A New Slope And
Intercept
• Span Check Sequences Are Run Weekly To Ascertain
Whether Or Not A Particular Instrument Is Drifting Or
Malfunctioning - May Also Set A New Intercept
• Span-Zero Check Sequences Are Run Nightly To Ascertain
Whether Or Not A Particular Instrument Is Drifting Or
Malfunctioning
• Any Of These Sequences Can Be Automatically Scheduled
On Either The Calibrator Or The Datalogger
• Any Of These Sequences Can Be Manually Initiated As
Necessary
1 - 14
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
AUTOMATIC TESTS
5-Point 3-Point 2-Point
Test
X
X
X
Completeness
X
X
X
Voltage Outlier
X
X
X
Concentration Outlier
X
X
X
Concentration Spacing
X
Slope
X
Intercept
X
Precision
X
Linearity
X
X
X
Zero
X
X
X
Span
X
X
NOx Balance Test
X
X
NOx Converter Eff. Test
X
X
H2S Converter Eff. Test
X
X
H2s Scrubber Eff. Test
1 - 15
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
OTHER DATA CHECKS
• Automatic Met Data Checks
• Optional Upper And Lower Limits
• Optional NEG Test
• Optional MUL Test
1 - 16
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
OPERATIONAL DOCUMENTATION
• There Is An Electronic Operator Log On Each Datalogger
– Web Interface For Viewing Operator Logs
– Can Also Add Log Entries Via The Web
– Certain Web Pages Also Trigger Automatic Operator Log Entries
• Any Change Made By A Data Validator Results In An
Automatic Validator Note Entry
– Web Interface For Viewing Validator Notes
– Certain Web Pages Also Trigger Automatic Validator Note Entries
• There Is A Web-Based Contact Manager That Can Be Used
To Record Who Operates Sites And/Or Particular
Instruments As Well As Who Validates The Data
• Web-Based Data Reports
1 - 17
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
WEB INTERFACE
• Web Pages Are Dynamic And Written In Perl
• Web Pages Run Off A Combination Of Derived
Files And The Master Pollution Database
– Derived Files Automatically Updated By Background
Processes
– Derived Files Generally Contain Data Averages Or
Information That Is Not Stored In The LEADS Pollution
Database
– Some Derived Files May Literally Take Hours To Update The Derived Files Speed Delivery Of Information To Web
Users
• Many Of The Web Pages Display System Health
And Status Information
1 - 18
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
POLLUTION RETRIEVAL/DISPLAY
• Also Known As Manual Validation Or ManVal
• Lets You Examine 5-Minute Data As Well As Hourly
Averages
• Data Graphically Displayed
– Up To One Month Of Data Can Be Displayed
• Data Validators Use This Interface To Edit Data
– Requires Specific Privileges In Order To Make Any Changes
To Data
– Can Change Data Flags
– Can Change Slope And Intercept
• Wind And Pollution Roses Included In This Interface
1 - 19
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
MANUAL VALIDATION WINDOW
1 - 20
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
STATUS INFORMATION
• Information About Each Data Point Is Displayed At The Bottom
Of The Window
• The Information Displayed Is Dynamic And Is Based On The
Data Point Located Under The Cursor
• Available Information Includes:
– Date And Time Sample Was Collected
– Sample Value In Engineering Units
– EPA Data Flag
– The Slope And Intercept Applied To The Measured Voltages
– Whether Or Not The Data Point Has Been Validated (Two Indicators)
– Whether Or Not There Are Any Validator Notes Attached To The Data
• There Are Also Data Entry Areas For Manually Entered Slopes
And Intercepts
1 - 21
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
WHAT’S IN THE DISPLAY
1 - 22
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
ROSE TYPES
• There Are Four Types Of Roses Available
– Each Of The Roses Summarizes Data Over The Time Span You Select
– Data Is Accumulated Into Each Of The Direction Bins
• Wind Rose
– This Is A Standard Wind Rose Plot Which Illustrates Wind Speed As A Function Of
Direction
• Average Concentration Rose
– This Pollution Rose Will Display The Average Concentration Of A Particular Pollutant Or
Other Parameter Measured At A Monitoring Site As A Function Of Wind Direction
• Maximum Concentration Rose
– This Pollution Rose Will Display The Maximum Concentration Of A Particular Pollutant Or
Other Parameter Measured At A Monitoring Site As A Function Of Wind Direction
• Percentile Rose
– This Pollution Rose Allows You To Filter Pollution Concentrations In Order To Reject
Abnormally High Or Low Readings - The Smaller The Percentile You Select, The Less Data
Is Included In The Pollution Rose
– Selecting A Percentile Of 100 Is The Same As Selecting A Maximum Concentration Rose
1 - 23
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
WIND ROSE
1 - 24
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
POLLUTION ROSE
1 - 25
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
QC SEQUENCES
• Sequences Are Composed Of Levels
• A Level Consists Of A Set Concentration From The
Calibrator Introduced Into A Monitor For A Set Number Of 5Minute Sample Periods
• Each Level Is Assigned A Letter Code (M, R, S, T, Or G) By
The Datalogger -- These Correspond To Various
Percentages Of The Instrument Full-Scale
• A Set Number Of 5-Minute Samples (Usually 1 - 3) In Each
Level Are Allowed For Instrument Stabilization
• The Remaining Samples (Usually 3 - 4) Are Processed By
LEADS.
1 - 26
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
FIVE-POINT CALIBRATION
1 - 27
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
THREE-POINT SPAN CHECK
1 - 28
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
TWO-POINT SPAN-ZERO CHECK
1 - 29
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
POSSIBLE QC CHECK FLAGS
• Incomplete
– The Data Did Not Arrive In The Proper Sequence Or There Were Either
Too Few Or Too Many Samples At Each Level
• Invalid
– The Calibrator Did Not Deliver The Challenge Gas At Correctly Spaced
Intervals
• Failed
– One Or More Of The Automatic QC Checks Exceeded A Pre-Set Failure
Limit -- Data Is Automatically Rejected Accordingly
• Warning
– One Or More Of The Automatic QC Checks Exceeded A Pre-Set Warning
Limit -- The Calibration Or Span Check Is Still Valid And Is Still Used
• Passed
– All Automatic QC Checks Were Passed
1 - 30
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
AUTOMATIC TESTS
• Completeness Test
– Tests To See That Data Arrives In Correct Order And The Correct Number
Of Updates For Each Level Are Present
• Voltage Outlier
– Tests Are Based On The Measured Voltages From The Instrument
– Tests To See That No Single Voltage Measurement For A Level Is More
Than An Allowed Deviation From The Average Voltage
• Concentration Outlier
– Tests To See That No Single Concentration Measurement For A Level Is
More Than An Allowed Deviation From The Average Concentration
– This Test Was Specifically Designed To Catch Calibration System
Problems
1 - 31
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
AUTOMATIC TESTS (Cont.)
• NO2 Concentration Outlier
– Based Entirely On NO Channel Performance On Previous Non-Titration
Level (M-Level) And Current Titration Level
(M*-Level) -- NO2 Voltages Are Not Part Of This Test
– Tests To See That No Single Concentration Measurement For A Level Is
More Than An Allowed Deviation From The Average Concentration
• Concentration Spacing
– Tests To See That The Calibrator Is Delivering Evenly Spaced
Concentrations Throughout The Instrument’s Range
– No Concentration For A Level Can Be More Than An Allowed Deviation
From The Ideal Concentration
1 - 32
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
AUTOMATIC TESTS (Cont.)
• NO2 Concentration Spacing
– Based Entirely On NO Channel Performance On Previous Non-Titration
Level (M-Level) And Current Titration Level
(M*-Level) -- Differs From Normal Concentration Spacing Test
– No Concentration For A Level Can Be More Than An Allowed Deviation
From The Ideal Concentration
• Slope
– Tests To See That The Instrument Is Responding Correctly. All
Instrument Responses Should Be Linear And The Calculated Slope
Should Be Near The Ideal
– Ideal Slopes:
• CO = 20
• Other Pollutants = 1000 (0 - 1000 ppb Instrument Range)
• Other Pollutants = 2000 (0 - 500 ppb Instrument Range)
1 - 33
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
AUTOMATIC TESTS (Cont.)
• Intercept
– Tests To See That The Instrument Is Responding Correctly And That The
Calculated Intercept Is Near The Ideal
– Ideal Intercept = 0
• Precision
– Tests To See That The Instrument Has A Stable, Linear Response
– The Voltage Average For Each Level Is Compared To The Calculated
Regression Line And Must Be Within Limits
• Linearity
– Tests To See That The Instrument Is Holding A Stable, Linear Response
– The Voltage Average For The T-Level Is Compared To The Line Drawn
Between The M-Level And The G-Level And Must Be Within Limits
1 - 34
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
AUTOMATIC TESTS (Cont.)
• Zero
– Tests To See That The Instrument Calibration Is Holding Since The Last
Good Calibration Or Span
– The Voltage Average For The G-Level Is Compared To The G-Level From
The Last Good Calibration Or Span And Must Be Within Limits
• Span
– Tests To See That The Instrument Calibration Is Holding Since The Last
Good Calibration Or Span
– The Voltage Average For The M-Level Is Compared To The M-Level From
The Last Good Calibration Or Span And Must Be Within Limits
1 - 35
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
AUTOMATIC TESTS (Cont.)
• NOx Balance Test
– Tests The Electronic And Flow Balance Between The NO and NOx
Channels. Compares The Ratio Of The Average NO2 Span Response To
The Average NO Span Response During Non-Titration Steps. Sensitive
To NO2 Impurities In NO Cylinder. Impurities Give Positive Errors.
– Only Affects The Validity Of The NO2 Channel Calibration
• NO2 Converter Efficiency Test
– Tests The Efficiency Of the NO2  NO Converter
– Affects The Validity Of The NO2 And NOx Channel Calibrations
1 - 36
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
AUTOMATIC TESTS (Cont.)
• H2S Converter Efficiency Test
– Tests The Efficiency Of the H2S  SO2 Converter
– Based On The T-Level And The T1-Level. Test Is Sensitive To Agreement
Of The Calibrations Of The H2S Cylinder To The SO2 Cylinder.
• SO2 Scrubber Efficiency Test
– Tests The Efficiency Of the SO2 Scrubber
1 - 37
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
TEST LIMITS
• All QC Tests Performed On Calibration,Span Check, Or
Span-Zero Data Have Both Warning And Failure Limits
Except The Outlier Tests
• Each Outlier Test Uses Only One Limit But The Test Is
Repeated If An Outlier Is Detected.
• Each Warning Limit Is Chosen Statistically To Represent The
3rd Standard Deviation Value About The Mean Error Of A
Test
• There Should Be Only A 0.27% Probability Of Exceeding A
Warning Limit If The Monitoring System Is Working Properly
• Each Failure Limit Is Intended To Represent The Maximum
Error That Will Be Tolerated Without Invalidation Of The
Affected Data
1 - 38
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
DATA VALIDATION RULES
• Automatic Invalidation Of Data Is Based Only On Whether A
QC Test Passes Or Fails
• Warnings Are Not Considered In This Processing
• Failure Of A Concentration Outlier Test Or A Concentration
Spacing Test Indicates A Problem With The Calibration
System But Not With The Monitor (Except NO2)
• The Calibration Or Span Check Event Involved Is
Considered Invalid And The Ambient Pollution Data Is
Unaffected
• In The Event Of A Test Failure, Data Is Automatically
Rejected (Flagged LIM)
– To Stop Rejecting Data Forward, A Successful Five-Point Calibration
Must Be Run
– Data Is Rejected Back To The Last Successful Calibration, Span
Check, Or Span-Zero Check
1 - 39
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
SPAN SOURCE AUDITS
• Automatic Quality Control Should Be Augmented By
Quarterly Manual Span Source Audits
• Span Source Audits Evaluate The Accuracy Of The
Calibrator At Each Site
• Corrective Action Is Required If Audit Limits Are Exceeded
• If the Audit Passes, Then the Pollutant Monitor Should Be
Adjusted to Agree With the M-level Concentration Produced
by the Calibrator
• This Sets the Slope of the Monitor’s Response to the Ideal
• If a Slope Test Warning Is Reported Thereafter, Then Action
Must Be Taken to Determine If the Error Was Caused by
Monitor Drift or Span Source Drift
• A Span Source Audit May Be Needed If There Are No
Obvious Instrument Problems
1 - 40
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
UPPER AND LOWER LIMITS
• Limits Can Be Defined For A Specific Instrument At
A Site
• Any Parameter Can Have Limit Checks Defined
• Can Define Either An Upper Or Lower Limit Or Both
• System Automatically Flags Any Data That Falls
Outside Specified Limits As LIM
• LIM Data Is Automatically Excluded From
Averaging And Automatic Alerts
1 - 41
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
AUTOMATIC MET CHECKS
 Wind Speed Limits:
 Less than 0 or greater than 25 m/s (55.925 mph)
 Does not vary by .1 m/s (.2237 mph) over 3 hours
 Does not vary by .5 m/s (1.1185 mph) over 12 hours
 Wind Direction Limits:
 Less than 0 or greater than 360 degrees
 Does not vary by 1 degree over 3 hours
 Does not vary by 10 degrees over 18 hours
 Outdoor Temperature
 Value changes 15 C (27 F) degrees in one hour
 Value does not vary by .5 C (.9 F) degrees over 12 hours
 Dewpoint Temperature
 Value is greater than ambient temperature
 Value changes 15 C (27 F) degrees in one hour
 Value does not vary by .5 C (.9 F) degrees over 12 hours
 Precipitation
 Total is more than 25mm in one hour
 Total if more than 100mm in 24 hours
 Barometric Pressure
 Value is less than 940 mb or greater than 1060 mb
 Value changes more than 6 mb in 3 hours
 Solar Radiation
 Value is greater than 0.005 ly/min between 10 pm and 4 am
 Value greater than 1.94 ly/min anytime
1 - 42
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
NEG AND MUL TESTS
• Only Performed On Hourly Averages - Does
Not Affect Five-Minute Averages
• NEG Test Can Be Defined For Any Parameter
That Is Rolled Up Into An Hourly Average
– Test Will Automatically Set Slightly Negative
Averages To 0.0
– If Data Is “Too” Negative, It Will Be Flagged NEG
– Data Flagged NEG Is Automatically Excluded By
Other Displays And Analysis Algorithms
•
MUL Test Designed Specifically For NOx Family
– Tests To Make Sure That Sum Of NO And NO2
Measurements Are Consistent With NOx
Measurement
– If Data Is Not Consistent, All Three Parameters Will
Be Flagged MUL
– Data Flagged MUL Is Automatically Excluded By
Other Displays And Analysis Algorithms
1 - 43
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
ROLES AND ACTIONS
• There Are Five Basic User Roles
–
–
–
–
–
System Administrator
EMS General Administrator
Data Validator
Field Operator
Weather Forecaster
• Everyone Has Access To The Same Basic
Tools (Reviewing Data, System Operations,
Etc.)
• Certain Roles Have Expanded Capabilities
(Such As Changing System Configurations,
Etc.)
1 - 44
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR
• This Is Administration At The Operating
System Level
• Responsible For System User Accounts
–
–
–
–
Creation
Maintenance
File Ownership
File Permissions
• Creates Scheduled Tasks Related To
Operating System
• Responsible For Data Backups And Restores
1 - 45
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
EMS GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Administration At The EMS System Level
Adding New Sites
Monitoring Site Maintenance
Log Maintenance
General System Health
Scheduled Tasks Related To EMS
Setting Up And Maintaining Synchronization
Communications
Data Reloads
User Accounts For Web Pages And Manual
Validation
1 - 46
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
DATA VALIDATOR
• Primary Job Is To Ensure Data Meets Quality
Objectives Prior To Full Release
• Manual Validation Tool Designed Around Data
Validation
– Review Of Data
– Data Flagging
– Data Recovery
• Creates Reports For Submission To AQS
(Used To Be Called AIRS) Database
• This Is The Only Role With ManVal Write
Permissions
1 - 47
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
FIELD OPERATOR
• Responsible For Keeping The Monitoring
Sites And Instruments Running
• Performs Physical Site Maintenance
– Filter Replacement
– Scheduled Instrument Maintenance
– Instrument Removal/Replacement/Repair
• Should Be Using Available Tools To Review
Data And System Performance
• Use The Operator Log To Keep A Record Of
Everything You Do At The Site
1 - 48
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
WEATHER FORECASTER
• Has Access To Full LEADS Weather Toolkit
• Can Create Products Overlaying Measured
Data From The Sites With National Weather
Service Data
• Can Use The LEADS Tools To Create Custom
Pollution Forecast Products
– Ozone Potential Zones
– Pinpoint Weather Forecasts
• Should Be Involved With The Validation Of
The Meteorological Data Measured At The
Monitoring Sites
1 - 49
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
1 - 50
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
LEADS1 MACHINE
• Central Processor And Control Machine
• Master Data Repository
• Performs Majority Of Calculations Involving Data
• Synchronization Master
• Data Product Export
• Hosts Manual Validation Sessions
• Hosts Weather UI Sessions
1 - 51
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
NOAAPORT MACHINE
• Connected To The NOAAPort Antenna
• Ingests An Almost Constant Stream Of Data
From The NOAAPort Satellite
• Data Products Ingested Include:
– Surface Observations From Around The World
– Multiple Forecast Models
– Satellite Imagery
– Radar Imagery
• The NOAAPort Machine Acts As A Server To
Distribute Weather-Related Data To Clients
1 - 52
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
CFEP MACHINE
• COMMS Front-End Processor
• Handles All Communications Directly To The
Sites Related To Data Collection
• Performs A Variety Of Pre-Processing On The
Data From The Monitoring Sites
• Capable Of Distributing Data To Multiple
Servers
1 - 53
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
DSR MACHINE
• The Internal Web Server
• Also Hosts The Same Web Pages Available To
The General Public
• Majority Of The Internal Pages Are Technical
And Are Dedicated To Some Aspect Of
System Performance
• Users Of This Machine Are Assumed To Be
Trusted (This Machine Can Only Be Reached
From Inside The Agency Firewall)
1 - 54
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
WWW MACHINE
• The External Web Server
• Hosts The Web Pages Available To The
General Public
• These Pages Are A Subset Of All Available
Pages
• These Pages Have More Explanatory Text
Than The Internal Counterparts
• Restricted To Hourly Averages Only
• Users Of These Pages Are Assumed To Be
Unsavory At Best
1 - 55
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007
FINI
This Concludes LEADS/EMS Overview
1 - 56
IPS MeteoStar
February 22,2007