Common PDR Problems
Download
Report
Transcript Common PDR Problems
Common PDR Problems
ACES Presentation
T. Gregory Guzik
March 6, 2003
Summary of Major Short Falls
No plots or tables showing expected results
Individual parts are not systems
How do you select an appropriate sensor / ADC?
No attempts to compute power requirements
How to compute thermal requirements?
Poor understanding of Development phase
How to get data OUT of on-board storage?
How do you test your payload?
What is the WBS & how do you use it?
Section 3.0 Mission Objectives
What is the difference between mission, science and
technical goals?
– Mission is everything from launch to results
– Science is inquiry into nature
– Technical includes the practical aspects
What are your expected results?
–
–
–
–
From theory or previous measurements
Provides basis for instrument design
What sources are you measuring?
Needed for comparison with your data
Generate Science Requirements
– What needs to be measured with what accuracy and frequency
Section 4.0 Payload Design
Principle of Operation
– Show how your payload design will function to
deliver the science requirements
– How do your sensors work?
– What is the expected accuracy of your
measurements?
– How will you cover the required range?
A “Traceability Matrix” shows the logical
flow from requirements to hardware
Section 4.0 Systems
Individual parts are not systems
“Spacecraft” has five major systems
– Lift; Recovery; Payload; Beacon; Ground
– Each of these has subsystems
– Each subsystem has parts
What are the systems in your payload?
– Mechanical; Thermal; Power; Controller; Data
Acquisition; Data Archive; Sensors; Ground
– Each system has an interface to the other systems
The remainder of Section 4.0 details each of these
systems, their subsystems and parts
Section 4.0 Power
All had difficulty figuring out what to do about
power
– The power budget is a list of the voltage, current and
power (volts x current) required for all systems /
subsystems
– Obtain from specifications or measurements
– You then show how your power system will provide the
required voltage, currents and power for the mission
required time
Need to take into account loss due to temperature
and voltage conversion
More detailed talk on this subject on 3/11/03
Section 4.0 Other
Everyone had difficulty figuring out how to pick
an appropriate sensor / ADC
– How do you condition the sensor for the ADC?
– Talk on Data Acquisition on 3/11
Everyone had problems with thermal
– Talk on Thermal issues on 3/13
Mechanical design was not developed
– Related to thermal
– Talk on Mechanical issues 3/13
The Development Phase
From 1/21 Project Overview
Detailed in-depth study including
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Test hardware concepts by prototyping
Finalize designs
Purchase long lead items (identified at PDR)
Establish interface controls
Complete fabrication plan
Finish integration & test plans
Complete operations & data analysis plans
Critical Design Review (CDR)
From 1/21 Project Overview
Organized by the ACES Program
Results from your development phase
Determines whether you are ready to begin
building your payload
Include written report and oral presentation
Precise date should be identified during
PDR
Section 6.0 Construction
Software
– How will you get data OUT of storage?
– How do you verify that your software works?
Testing
– Listing the environment characteristics is NOT testing
– Testing is quantitatively verifying that your
subsystems work
integrated payload works
payload will operate correctly under flight conditions
Calibrations
– What needs to be calibrated?
– How will you do the calibration?
– What do you do with the calibration data?
Data Acquisition & Analysis
What is your data rate, format & volume?
What is a Data Analysis Plan?
–
–
–
–
All steps & components necessary to get results
How do you get data off your payload?
What is the analysis platform?
What processing are you going to do?
“busting” data from your format
applying calibrations
correlating with other datasets
– What data products will you produce?
– What software will you use?
– What software needs to be developed?
Management & Schedule
What is Interface Control?
– Listing your interfaces is in System Design
– Defining your interfaces is in detailed design
– How do you assure that ALL parties know
about, agree to & will build subsystems with
the correct interface
How do you develop a WBS and use it to
establish a realistic schedule?
– Review B. Ellison’s presentation
The WBS should be specific
Include only the tasks you are actually
going to do
– Changing a few words in a sample WBS is
going to lead you down the wrong path
WBS should not be presented down to more
than 2nd or 3rd level
Use one level more than presented to
estimate effort for task
Timeline follows the WBS
Assign personnel to each task
– Tasks by different people can be done in parallel
– Tasks by same person must be sequential
What is the task dependency?
– What tasks must be completed prior to the start of a task (e.g.
Can’t integrate payload unless all subsystems are done)
Need to distinguish between work time and calendar
time
Would be wise to include contingency
Identify milestones or major accomplishments
Link tasks together with a Gantt chart
Budgets
Long lead items where not always / clearly
identified
– Delivery requires more than 3 weeks
– Need to get requisition forms with three quotes in
ASAP
All payloads probably have many common
components
– IWG should identify, specify and writeup requisition
forms
Speaking of the IWG
Not one project mentioned the IWG in their
management
There are potentially many components across the
payloads that could be common
–
–
–
–
–
–
Develop solution only once
Common ADC, RTC and/or Memory chips
Common Data Format
Common Data Retrieval software
Common Data Processing software
Common parts pools (e.g. resistor, capacitor kits)
IWG should meet regularly to address such issues