Diapositiva 1
Download
Report
Transcript Diapositiva 1
New approach in functionality and testing for HV Capacitor
Bank Protection
†
Cardenas
♣
Cox
♣
Wyk
*
Chaka
Jorge
(J.C.), Sean
(S.C), Petru van
(P.W.), Boitumelo
(B.C), Mzwakhe Msimango* (M. M.), Mietek Klimek* (M. K.), Anura Perera (A. P.)
†
♣
*
GE Digital Energy , Powertech IST Energy , Eskom
Spain†, South Africa♣*
TESTINGS PERFORMED IN RTDS
TEST CIRCUITS
1.It was a requirement that Powertech IST Energy and GE
perform RTDS testing on the relays used in the CBP002
Capacitor Bank Schemes for ESKOM Transmission.
The following relays were tested at the RTDS facility at GE
based in Bilbao Spain:
· C70 (Multifunction Capacitor Bank protection relay)
· T60 (Low Impedance Restricted Earth Fault protection relay)
· MIB (High impedance Restricted Earth Fault protection relay)
The purpose of the tests was as follows:
1. To prove that the protection relays would be stable and not
mal-operate for the following conditions on a C-Type Filter
configuration:
a. The energisation of different capacitor bank schemes.
b. Transient response of the voltage and current at the busbars
when the adjacent Capacitor Banks are opened and closed.
c. Transient response at the busbars where Capacitor Banks are
connected upon
i. Loading and unloading of a transformer
ii. Loading and unloading of the line
d. External faults on the system as listed below:
i. At the Busbar
ii. At the end of the line
52
52
50/
51
51N
Conclusions
Shunt
Capacitor
Bank
60/
61
87R
59B
27B
Low
Voltage
Capacitor
Voltage
Differential
Relay
60/
61
Legend:
Low
Voltage
Capacitor
Unbalance
Protection
Relay
52
50/51
51N
59B
27B
60/61
61N
87R
Breaker
Overcurrent Function
Neutral Overcurrent Function
Bus Overvoltage Function
Bus Undervoltage Function
Phase Unbalance
Neutral Unbalance
Restricted Earth Fault
61N
Typical Capacitor Bank Protection System
Internal Faults simulated in the Test Circuit 4
CONCLUSIONS
1. The configuration of the surge arrestors have a large impact on the stability of Restricted Earth Fault relays for external faults. This is relevant
for both low impedance or high impedance type relays. This tripping can be avoided by an intentional time delay of 50ms on both relays.
Alternatively, the primary plant configuration must be changed in order for the surge arrestor currents to be included in the neutral CT for the
Restricted Earth Fault circuit.
2. It was seen that there was no benefit gained by using the low impedance Restricted Earth Fault relay (T60). The high impedance Restricted
Earth Fault relay (MIB) was in fact slightly faster in most cases.
3. PT-IST and GE both recommend using the MIB relay for the ESKOM networks as the price premium for a low impedance Restricted Earth
Fault relay is not justified.
4. It was also found that for certain earth faults in the Capacitor, there was not enough V0 polarizing voltage to determine the direction.
5. Further testing and theoretical calculations were done after the RTDS testing in Spain on directional earth fault protection in capacitor banks.
It was found that for an external or internal fault at the busbars, directionality appeared to be the same due to the nature of the two types of
faults. Therefore directional earth fault cannot be utilized in capacitor bank protection schemes.
6. The C70, T60 and MIB relays were proven to be stable for external faults while tripping correctly for internal faults. Therefore the relays in
question are suitable for capacitor bank protection in the ESKOM network..