52 - ABB Group
Download
Report
Transcript 52 - ABB Group
How to determine the right self healing grid
strategy to achieve your budget and reliability
goals: A look at three business models
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 1
Self healing grid strategies
Presenter
Cleber Angelo
Outdoor Medium Voltage
Global Product Manager
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 2
Self healing grid strategies
Agenda
Challenges facing utilities today
Situational analysis
Improvement goals for self healing strategies
Introduction to self-healing grid business models
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 3
device level and /or peer to peer
substation level
centralized
Detailed explanations of each business model including
The type of investment required
Expected reliability improvements
Options to determine the best implementation strategy for your budget
Summary
Self healing grid strategies
Challenges facing utilities today
The industry is moving toward a
deregulated, competitive environment
requiring accurate information about
system performance to ensure
maintenance money are spent wisely and
customer expectations are met
CAIDI and SAIDI scores are under close
scrutiny from government agencies
System reliability pertains to both sustained
interruptions and momentary interruptions
Any interruption of greater than five minutes is
generally considered a reliability issue in some
countries.
Limited capital budgets for continued
improvements in grid reliability
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 4
Self healing grid strategies
Interruption definitions
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 5
Momentary interruption – A single
operation of an interrupting device that
results in zero voltage.
Momentary interruption event - An
interruption of duration limited to the
period required to restore service by an
interrupting device. This must be
completed within 5 minutes or any other
period determined by regulation
agencies.
Sustained interruption – any
interruption not classified as a
momentary interruption
Self healing grid strategies
Improvement goals
Implementing self healing or fault
detection isolation and restoration
(FDIR) can help utilities:
Improve CAIDI and SAIDI metrics
by up to 33%
Decrease restoration time to less
than 30 seconds
Reduce the cost of restoration
Prevent lost revenues
Boost the utility’s reputation with
customers, stockholders and
government regulators
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 6
Self healing grid strategies
1st business model: Device level or peer-to-peer
Device level and/or peer-to-peer
A group of reclosers, load break switches,
and feeder circuit breakers operate together
to restore power in the most optimal manner
Benefits
Allows utilities to focus investments on
feeders that experience the most outages
Fast implementation
Initial low capital investment
Target solution appropriate for problem
feeders
Improves SAIDI and CAIDI scores
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 7
Self healing grid strategies
Requirements for device level (no communications required)
System topology representation
Pre-fault system status
Normal voltage measurements at each node and on both sides
of “tie switch”
Pre-fault system loading (capacity check for the restoration done
by protection or planning engineers)
Fault detection and isolation
Feeders with single restoration path, generally open “tie switch”
Coordinated protection devices using standard protection curves
and predetermined reclosing intervals
Load restoration
Loss of voltage detected on one side of “tie switch” and on
source side of reclosers on faulted circuit
Timing sequence initiated
If loss of voltage is sustained for predetermined interval, other
reclosers open if necessary to continue isolation and “tie switch”
closes restoring power
Device level
Loop automation (no communications)
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
3 VT’s
1 VT
1 VT
Tie Point
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
1 VT
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
1 VT
52
GridShield
3 VT’s
Device level
Loop automation (no communications)
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Fault
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
52
GridShield
52
X
GridShield
3 VT’s
1 VT
1 VT
Tie Point
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
1 VT
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
1 VT
52
GridShield
3 VT’s
Device level
Loop automation (no communications)
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Fault
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
52
GridShield
52
X
GridShield
3 VT’s
1 VT
1 VT
Tie Point
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
1 VT
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
1 VT
52
GridShield
3 VT’s
Device level
Loop automation (no communications)
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Fault
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
52
GridShield
52
X
GridShield
3 VT’s
1 VT
1 VT
Tie Point
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
1 VT
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
1 VT
52
GridShield
3 VT’s
Device level
Loop automation (no communications)
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Fault
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
52
GridShield
52
X
GridShield
3 VT’s
1 VT
1 VT
Tie Point
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
1 VT
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
1 VT
52
GridShield
3 VT’s
Device level
Loop automation (no communications)
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Fault
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
52
GridShield
52
X
GridShield
3 VT’s
1 VT
1 VT
Tie Point
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
1 VT
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
1 VT
52
GridShield
3 VT’s
Self healing grid strategies
Requirements for peer-to-peer (requires communications)
System topology representation
Pre-fault system status
Switch status (upstream and downstream information for
devices)
Pre-fault system loading (capacity check for the restoration)
Fault detection
Based on recloser lockout status and reclosing counter value
change, or substation breaker trip signal
Downstream node of the lockout switch is the fault location
Fault isolation
Feeders with single restoration path, generally open “tie switch”
Downstream switch(es) of the fault location
Load restoration
Start from the downstream node of the isolation switches
Device level
Peer-to-Peer
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
Tie Point
Recloser
IEC 61850 Communications
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
52
GridShield
Device level
Peer-to-Peer
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
Fault
52
GridShield
X
52
GridShield
Tie Point
Recloser
IEC 61850 Communications
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
52
GridShield
Device level
Peer-to-Peer
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
Fault
52
GridShield
X
52
GridShield
Tie Point
Recloser
IEC 61850 Communications
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
52
GridShield
Device level
Peer-to-peer
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
Fault
52
GridShield
X
52
GridShield
Tie Point
Recloser
IEC 61850 Communications
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
52
GridShield
Summary device level
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 20
Initial low capital investment
Target solution appropriate for problem feeders
Best fit for single restoration path circuits
Improves SAIDI and CAIDI scores
Loop schemes requires voltage sensors
Peer-to-peer requires high speed communications –
IEC61850 is only standards based peer-to-peer
solution available with open protocol environment
Protection/coordination engineers manage logic
Self healing grid strategies
2nd business model: Substation level
Substation level
Coordinated control between groups of
reclosers, load break switches, and substation
circuit breakers within a substation and
possibly with adjacent substations
Benefits
Avoids overloading of adjacent substations
Reduces engineering support and recurring
costs
Target solution appropriate for problem feeders
Supports future communications investments
for applications such as asset health and
volt/Var control
Utilities realize benefits on groups of
substations and the feeders they control
Increases improvement in SAIDI and CAIDI
scores
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 21
Self healing grid strategies
Introduction to substation level
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 22
IEDs monitor and control switches
Substation computer collects data from IEDs
FDIR active logic resides on substation computer
Automatic identification and isolation of a fault
Automatic power restoration
Generally faster response than control centerbased FDIR
Substation level
Substation based supervision
Midpoint
Recloser
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 1
Fault
52
GridShield
X
52
GridShield
Tie Point
Recloser
DNP/IEC Communications
Sectionalizing
Recloser
Substation
Circuit
Breaker
Source 2
Midpoint
Recloser
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
52
GridShield
Substation level
Substation based supervision
Substation level
Substation based supervision
Substation level
Substation computer-based FDIR active logic
Start
Obtain IED Information
No
Permanent Fault
Occurs ?
Yes
Poll IED information
-Sw status (open, close,
lockout)
-Sw recloser counter value
-Sw Current …
- Identify fault location
- Identify isolation switches
- Send isolation control
command
- Confirm isolation actions
Generate Isolation Logic
Implement isolation control
Generate Restoration Logic
Implement restoration control
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 26
- Search alternative sources
- Obtain restoration solution
- Send restoration control
command
- Confirm restoration actions
Substation level
Substation computer-based FDIR requirements
Dynamic system configuration update
Represent system topology through system single line
Automatically generates logic for isolation and restoration via single line
model
System incidence matrix is dynamically generated based on
System connectivity model
Real-time system switch status
Depth-first search strategy (traces all paths available to determine the
optimal solution to restore power)
Fault restoration
Load current-based capacity check (pre-fault load current)
Single or multi-path restoration supported
Multi-path restoration – unserved loads picked up by multiple feeders
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 27
Summary Substation Level
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 28
Initial low capital investment
Target solution appropriate for problem feeders
Can provide multiple paths for restoration, but generally best
fit if all sources for restoration are from same substation
Improves SAIDI and CAIDI scores
Requires communications (lower baud, i.e., 9600) but
possibly already in place
Protection/coordination engineers must work with SCADA
engineers.
Should reduce customized logic in protection devices
Utilities realize benefits on groups of substations and the
feeders they control
Self healing grid strategies
3rd business model – Centralized control
Centralized
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 29
Coordinated control between groups of reclosers, load
break switches, and high voltage circuit breakers
across the distribution grid
Benefits
Takes advantage of load profile forecasting
Allows utilities to take a proactive approach to power
management
Highest level of worker safety
Supports smart grid initiatives
Utilities realize benefits across the grid
Maximum improvement in SAIDI and CAIDI scores
Self healing grid strategies
Introduction to centralized control
IEDs monitor and control switches
Substation computer collects IED data
Substation computer acts as gateway –
serves IED data to control center
SCADA and DMS
Restoration Switching Analysis (RSA)
run on DMS
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 30
Load flow analysis as part of RSA,
i.e., full network model used
Automated or advisory FDIR
Generally slower response than
substation-based FDIR, but more
comprehensive solution
Centralized control
Source 2
Source 4
52
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
52
52
( GridShield
Source 3
52
52
52
GridShield
Source 1
GridShield
Fault
52
52
GridShield
X
52
GridShield
52
52
52
GridShield
GridShield
GridShield
Source 4
52
52
GridShield
B
52
GridShield
52
GridShield
52
Centralized control
Centralized control
Centralized control
Centralized control
Summary centralized control level
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 36
Requires SCADA applications, generally DMS with load flow
and short circuit capability
Target solution appropriate for all feeders
Can provide multiple paths for restoration from multiple
substations
Improves SAIDI and CAIDI scores
Requires communications (lower baud, i.e., 9600) but
possibly already in place.
Protection/coordination engineers must work with SCADA
engineers
Should reduce customized logic in protection devices
Utilities realize benefits on groups of substations and the
feeders they control
Summary
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 37
Electric System performance and reliability are continually
being scrutinized by customers and regulators
Performance indices are becoming more difficult to meet
Bottom line is that utilities need flexible and adaptable
solutions to reduce outage restoration times
No single solution meets every customer’s needs
Device level solutions are generally “low cost”, easy to
pilot and can be implemented by protection and control
group
Substation level solutions provide multi-feeder
restoration paths, again are easy to pilot and can re-use
existing equipment and communications infrastructure
Centralized solutions offers most flexible and
comprehensive restoration options.
Overview
Outdoor Portfolio
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 38
© ABB Group
April 13, 2015 | Slide 39