When a society considered abortion murder. Today it has

download report

Transcript When a society considered abortion murder. Today it has

Where do we
Kazan State Agricultural
Kazan, Russia
demand for energy and raw material
solution of food problems and hunger
continuing fight against diseases and protection of
human health, animal and plant
enormous environmental challenges facing today
tendency of population to achieve a new quality of
need to develop depressed agricultural regions
successful march of the "green revolution" and their
economic efficiency
One aspect of economic activity, "taking into account the
hidden positive impact of biological processes and
renewable bio-resources on public health, as well as on
economic growth and development"
As part of the production process, as "economy that uses
renewable bioresources, the end results of bioprocesses and the
potential of eco-industrial clusters (eco-industrial clusters) in
order to produce new bioproducts, profit from their sales and
create more jobs"
Means the practice of conversion and use of living systems,
including the human body, based on nana-bio-info-gene
technology for political and economic purposes. A man and a
group of people got a real opportunity to rebuild nature,
cosmos, social cosmos, own biogenetic nature and other living
 "When a society considered abortion murder.
Today it has become constitutional right of
American women. Same thing with Dolly. It's
not that she was a sheep, and that we behave
like sheep, dreaming about an artificial man,
dreaming of becoming gods, repeat God's work
 Moses Tendler:
 Today no one can even roughly estimate the consequences
that would entail the reproduction of living organisms ,
created artificially. The evolution of live a long and slow.
And nobody knows what will develop the relationship
between artificial and natural living organisms.
 Will determine whether living organisms "healthy" for
humans and other living creatures or turn into pathogens,
whether they will improve human evolution has developed
the genotype or vice versa. Lead to deviations from him ...
As long as these and other similar questions unanswered.
 Can living beings, biotypes, species or nature in general,
be the aim itself?
 What are the basic moral norms should govern the
relations between man and Nature, planetary society and
the environment?
 What are the limits of permissible the use of new bionano-genotechnology and techniques ?
 Can the human race is responsible to take their destiny and
nature into their own hands?
1. Social: "A new area of knowledge, connecting biological
knowledge with knowledge of human, moral values .... I
took bio, to represent biological knowledge, the science
of living systems, and I took ethics, to provide
knowledge of value systems of human morality “,- W.R.
2. Medical: "Bioethics is an interdisciplinary research
ethical, philosophical and anthropological issues raised
by advances in biomedical science and application of
innovative technologies in health care practice",
3. Philosophical: "The science of choice and evaluation
criteria of the moral relationship to the alive“, - F.T.
 Talking about the technological challenges no one can escape from the
problems of ethical choice, and score one or the necessary decisions
can keep the development of negative processes at some particular
level, to deal with them, having a clear perspective
 Expensive technological capabilities in order to maintain human well-
being, above all, its life and health, the surrounding natural cause of
the fact that each case their use is socially significant. It can not be
ignored, more needs to be certain mechanisms of social regulation,
including through international cooperation
 will avoid such applications of biotechnology, which
are contrary to human rights and contain the risks
outweigh the potential benefits
respect the animals used in experiments, and treat
them humanely
must comply with all the issues and ideas emerging
from all sectors of society, and should pay special
attention to cultural and religious differences
better information and better understanding of what
biotechnology and where it can be
supports science-based monitoring by government
agencies, whose goal is to protect the health, safety
 do not begin to cure genetic diseases or engineering by
introducing changes into the genome as long as all the
ethical and social issues arising in relation to such
treatment will not be fully discussed and resolved
 Regarding the establishment of new agricultural
varieties, to guarantee their compliance with
established standards of environmental safety, both
for our state, and for other countries
 will not engage in research that can guide the
development, testing or production of weapons
 an interdisciplinary dialogue platform
 social regulation of technology risks of the new
development and changes in "material viability"
constructive communication authorities, businesses,
scientists and society
support, research and social projects aimed at preserving
the health and welfare of man and nature
“internal optics" moral attitude to the living and the
categorical imperative bioeconomy
condition for the development of civil society and rule of
"Wait for the Tsar to return to a lawful order."
[email protected]