Transcript Slide 1

ETHICAL ISSUES ON
HUMAN REMAINS
drg. Claudia Surjadjaja, MPH, MSc, DrPH
Seminar on Sites, Bodies, and Stories: Formation of Indonesian Cultural Heritage
Eijkman Institute of Molecular Biology, 13 – 14 August 2009
Definition of human remains

Bodies of people who lived thousands of years and
bodies of those died within recent or living memory

Bodies and part of bodies of once living people

Osteological material (whole or part skeletons,
individual bones or fragments of bone and teeth),
ashes, soft tissue including organs and skin, blood,
hair, embryos and slide preparations of human tissue

Any of the above modified and/or physically boundup with non-human materials to form an artefact from
several materials
2
Ethics = Moral Philosophy





How should we live?
Why should we live like that?
What is good/bad, evil?
How should we decide that an act is ethical?
Moral Theory: normative ethics arrives at moral
standards that regulate right and wrong conduct
We are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live
(Socrates, in Plato’s Republic)
3
Non sequitur
Postulate 1: Ethics is about the living
Postulate 2: Human remains are the dead
Thus ethics on human remains is non sequitur
It is about distress to the LIVING and not the DEAD
I certainly wouldn’t dig up my own mother. Well, I would if her
graveyard was going to be destroyed. For scientific curiosity?
Certainly wouldn’t do that. Oh, the body needed to be exhumed for
use as evidence? OK, I would. What? It’s not only about excavation
but about storage and display? Absolutely wouldn’t, even if the
bones would be returned to the ground after use. Well, … unless
they served some useful education purpose, e.g. better scientific
analysis, new cure for cancer, etc, I would.
Human remains are not neutral objects
4
Moral relativism






There are no absolute, concrete rights and wrongs
Intrinsic ethical judgment exists as abstract
There is no universal moral truths
Claims made related to social, cultural, historical,
personal circumstances
Moral values only applicable within certain cultural
boundaries
Example: Darius and the Callatians
“Of all things law is king” (Herodotus, c.484 BC–c.425 BC)
5
The questions
1.
2.
Do ideas about ancestors play a role?
What role plays religion?
Human remains in cave at Londa Nanggala (Toraja Land, Sulawesi)
Photo: Rhett A. Butler mongabay.com
6
Human remains in the museum
Categories:
 identifiable human remains claimed by genealogical
descendants or those of comparable status
 human remains claimed by cultural descendants or
concerned parties
 human remains unclaimed by genealogical or cultural
descendants
“Respect the interests of originating communities with regard to
elements of their cultural heritage present or represented in the
museum. Involve originating communities, wherever practical, in
decisions about how the museum stores, researches, presents
or otherwise uses collections and information about them.”
(Museums Association Code of Ethics 2002, 7.5)
7
1. Do ideas about ancestors play a role?
Meaning and moral implications of cultural heritage:

Disinterred and removal of indigenous human remains
without permission of the descendants  movable
cultural heritage

Bodies of ancestors represent important spiritual
heritage = essential element of cultural identity.
Religious practice includes worship of ancestors.

For indigenous peoples, both the dead and their burial
grounds remain sacred even after thousands of years.

Potential conflict between wider social importance as
repositories of scientific information and their special
significance to the indigenous community.
8
Code of Ethics on Human Remains

Vermillion Accord on Human Remains (WAC,1989)
5. Agreement on the disposition of fossil, skeletal, mummified and other
remains shall be reached by negotiation on the basis of mutual respect for
the legitimate concerns of communities for the proper disposition of their
ancestors, as well as the legitimate concerns of science and education.

Obligations to Indigenous People (WAC First Code of
Ethics,1990)
5. Members shall not interfere with and/or remove human remains of
indigenous peoples without the express consent of those concerned.

Tamaki Makau-rau Accord on the Display of Human
Remains and Sacred Objects (WAC, 2006)
… human remains include any organic remains and associated
materials… Community may include, but is not limited to, ethnic, racial,
religious, traditional or indigenous groups of people… good science is
guided by ethical principles and that our work must involve consultation
and collaboration with communities.
9
Codes on Repatriation & Reburial

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation
Act (NAGPRA 1990)
Burial sites are sacred places that should not be disturbed;
removing human remains from graves in any circumstances is an
act of desecration; remains that have been removed from graves
should be returned to descendants, who have the right to decide
how ancestral remains and sacred artifacts should be treated.





Non-Australian Indigenous Human Remains Policy (National
Museum of Australia 2009)
International Council of Museums Code of Ethics (2004)
British Association for Biological Anthropology and
Osteoacheology (BABAO) Code of Ethics for Archaeological
Human Remains
WAC code of ethics (as stated previously)
Other museums code of ethics on human remains
10
2. What roles play religion?
 Christianity's long history of public display of dead bodies
(funerary rituals to religious relics)
 Religious practice includes worship of ancestors in
indigenous communities
 Islam believes that wherever one dies should be buried
there. A human body is sacred even after death. “Breaking
the bone of a dead person is similar (in sin) to breaking the bone of a
living person” (Sunan Abu Dawud, Sunan Ibn Majah, and Musnad
Ahmad).
11
Future issues



Re-study the Human Remains: What would be an
Indonesian Code of Ethics?
Repatriation: argument on this issue, whether this is
morally just
In Indonesia: what plays role? who plays role? what
considered as Indonesian ethics?
12