Transcript notes - Iowa State University

Data Mining

Find information from data
data
?
information
Data Mining

Find information from data
data

Questions

?
information

What data  any data
What information  anything useful
Data Mining

Find information from data
data

Questions

?


Characteristics

information
What data  any data
What information  anything useful

Data is huge volume
Computation is extremely intensive
Mining Association Rules
CS461 Lecture
Department of Computer Science
Iowa State University
Ames, IA 50011
Basket Data


Retail organizations, e.g., supermarkets, collect
and store massive amounts sales data, called
basket data.
Each basket is a transaction, which consists of

transaction date

items bought
Association Rule: Basic Concepts


Given: (1) database of transactions, (2) each
transaction is a list of items
Find: all rules that correlate the presence of one
set of items with that of another set of items
 E.g., 98% of people who purchase tires and
auto accessories also get automotive services
done
Rule Measures: Support and
Confidence
Customer
buys both
Customer
buys beer
Customer 
buys diaper
Find all the rules X  Y with
minimum confidence and support
 support, s, probability that a
transaction contains {X, Y}
 confidence, c, conditional
probability that a transaction
having {X} also contains Y
Transaction ID Items Bought Let minimum support 50%, and
minimum confidence 50%,
2000
A,B,C
we have
1000
A,C
 A  C (50%, 66.6%)
4000
A,D
5000
B,E,F
 C  A (50%, 100%)
Applications

Basket data analysis, cross-marketing, catalog
design, loss-leader analysis, clustering,
classification, etc.
 Maintenance Agreement (What the store should
do to boost Maintenance Agreement sales)
 Home Electronics (What other products should
the store stocks up?)
 Attached mailing in direct marketing
Challenges


Finding all rules XY with minimum support
and minimum confidence

X could any set of items

Y could any set of items
Naïve approach


Enumerate all candidates XY
For each candidate XY, compute its
minimum support and minimum confidence
Mining Frequent Itemsets: the
Key Step

STEP1: Find the frequent itemsets: the sets of
items that have minimum support


The key step
STEP2: Use the frequent itemsets to generate
association rules
Mining Association Rules—An Example
Transaction ID
2000
1000
4000
5000
Items Bought
A,B,C
A,C
A,D
B,E,F
Min. support 50%
Min. confidence 50%
Frequent Itemset Support
{A}
75%
{B}
50%
{C}
50%
{A,C}
50%
For rule A  C:
support = support({A , C}) = 50%
confidence = support({A, C})/support({A}) = 66.6%
Mining Association Rules—An Example
Transaction ID
2000
1000
4000
5000
Items Bought
A,B,C
A,C
A,D
B,E,F
Min. support 50%
Min. confidence 50%
Frequent Itemset Support
{A}
75%
{B}
50%
{C}
50%
{A,C}
50%
How to generate frequent itemset?
Apriori Principle

Any subset of a frequent itemset must also be
a frequent itemset


If {AB} is a frequent itemset, both {A} and {B}
must be a frequent itemset
If {AB} is not a frequent itemset, {ABX} cannot be
a frequent itemset
Finding Frequent Itemsets

Iteratively find frequent itemsets with
cardinality from 1 to k (k-itemset)

Find frequent 1-itemsets


Find frequent 2-itemset


{A}, {B}
…
{AX}, {BX}
The Apriori Algorithm

Pseudo-code:
Ck: candidate itemset of size k
Lk : frequent itemset of size k
L1 = {frequent items};
for (k = 1; Lk !=; k++) do begin
Ck+1 = candidates generated from Lk;
for each transaction t in database do
increment the count of all candidates in Ck+1
contained in t
Lk+1 = candidates in Ck+1 with min_support
end
return k Lk;
The Apriori Algorithm — Example
Database D
TID
100
200
300
400
itemset sup.
C1
{1}
2
{2}
3
Scan D
{3}
3
{4}
1
{5}
3
Items
134
235
1235
25
C2 itemset sup
L2 itemset sup
2
2
3
2
{1
{1
{1
{2
{2
{3
C3 itemset
{2 3 5}
Scan D
{1 3}
{2 3}
{2 5}
{3 5}
2}
3}
5}
3}
5}
5}
1
2
1
2
3
2
L1 itemset sup.
{1}
{2}
{3}
{5}
2
3
3
3
C2 itemset
{1 2}
Scan D
L3 itemset sup
{2 3 5} 2
{1
{1
{2
{2
{3
3}
5}
3}
5}
5}
How to Generate Candidates?

Step 1: self-joining Lk-1


Observation: all possible frequent k-itemsets
can be generated by self-joining Lk-1
Step 2: pruning

Observation: If any subset of an K-itemset is
not a frequent itemset, the K-itemset cannot
be frequent
Example of Generating Candidates

L3={abc, abd, acd, ace, bcd}

Self-joining: L3*L3


abcd from abc and abd

acde from acd and ace
Pruning:


acde is removed because ade is not in L3
C4={abcd}
Generating Candidates: Pseudo Code

Suppose the items in Lk-1 are listed in an order

Step 1: self-joining Lk-1
insert into Ck
select p.item1, p.item2, …, p.itemk-1, q.itemk-1
from Lk-1 p, Lk-1 q
where p.item1=q.item1, …, p.itemk-2=q.itemk-2, p.itemk-1 <
q.itemk-1

Step 2: pruning
forall itemsets c in Ck do
forall (k-1)-subsets s of c do
if (s is not in Lk-1) then delete c from Ck
How to Count Supports of
Candidates?

Why counting supports of
candidates a problem?

The total number of candidates
can be very huge


One transaction may contain
many candidates


It is too expensive to scan the
whole database for each candidate
It is also expensive to check each
transaction against the entire set
of candidates
Method

Indexing candidate itemsets
using hash-tree
TID
items
1
abcdefg
abc
2
acdefg
acd
3
abcfg
bcd
4
sdf
5
dfg
:::
hfhg
9..9
dxv
Frequent
3-item set
::::
xyz
Hash-Tree



Leaf node: contains a list of itemsets
Interior node: contains a hash table
 Each bucket points to another
node
 Depth of root = 1
 Buckets of a node at depth d
points to nodes at depth d+1
All itemsets are stored in leaf nodes
H
H
Depth=1
H
H
Hash-Tree: Example
Hash(k1)
Hash(k2)
Hash(k3)
K1, K2, K3
1)
2)
3)
Depth 1: hash(K1)
Depth 2: hash(K2)
Depth 3: hash(K3)
Hash-Tree: Construction

Searching for an itemset c:



start from the root
At depth d, to choose the branch
to follow, apply a hash function to
the d th item of c
Insertion of an itemset c



Search for the corresponding leaf
node
Insert the itemset into that leaf
If an overflow occurs:


Transform the leaf node into an
internal node
Distribute the entries to the new
leaf nodes according to the hash
function
H
H
Depth=1
H
H
Hash-Tree: Counting Support

Search for all candidate itemsets contained
in a transaction T(t1, t2, …, tn) :
 At the root



At an internal node at level d (reached
after hashing of item ti)


Determine the hash values for each item
in T
Continue the search in the resulting child
nodes
Determine the hash values and continue
the search for each item tk with K>I
At a leaf node

Check whether the itemsets in the leaf
node are contained in transaction T
H
H
Depth=1
H
H
Generation of Rules from Frequent Itemsets

For each frequent itemset X:

For each subset A of X, form a rule A(X - A)
Compute the confidence of the rule

Delete the rule if it does not have minimum confidence

Is Apriori Fast Enough? — Performance
Bottlenecks

The core of the Apriori algorithm:



Use frequent (k – 1)-itemsets to generate candidate frequent kitemsets
Use database scan and pattern matching to collect counts for the
candidate itemsets
The bottleneck of Apriori: candidate generation
 Huge candidate sets:



104 frequent 1-itemset will generate 107 candidate 2-itemsets
To discover a frequent pattern of size 100, e.g., {a1, a2, …,
a100}, one needs to generate 2100  1030 candidates.
Multiple scans of database:

Needs (n +1 ) scans, n is the length of the longest pattern
Summary

Association rule mining



probably the most significant contribution from the
database community in KDD
A large number of papers have been published
An interesting research direction

Association analysis in other types of data: spatial
data, multimedia data, time series data, etc.
References


R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. Swami. Mining association rules between sets
of items in large databases. SIGMOD'93, 207-216, Washington, D.C.
R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Fast algorithms for mining association rules. VLDB'94
487-499, Santiago, Chile.