Transcript The influence of wind speed on shallow cumulus convection from

THE INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED ON
SHALLOW CUMULUS CONVECTION
from
LES and bulk theory
Louise Nuijens and Bjorn Stevens
University of California, Los Angeles
Max-Planck institute for Meteorology, Hamburg
Outline
•
Why care about the trade winds?
•
RICO observations and simulations: disagreement?
•
An idealized framework
•
Large-Eddy Simulation set-up and results
•
Explaining the response to wind speed using bulk concepts
•
Summary and concluding remarks
Why care about the trade winds?
The “trades” are defined by their winds, or perhaps by the constancy of the winds.
When studying the meteorological structure of the trades, we often overlook the
variability of the winds compared to other features.
How does the strengthening (weakening) of the trade winds affect the
processes and clouds within the air masses they advect?
Nuijens et al. (2009)
RICO observations
Nuijens et al. (2009) hypothesize that the moister profile represents an
equilibrium response of the layer to stronger winds:
“if the depth of the layer does not change, and the layer moistens and
warms enough, surface fluxes may relax back to their original values”
Fq,s  CDU qs  qm , F ,s  CDU  s   m 
RICO simulations


Stronger winds lead to significant deepening, less evident moistening, and
stronger surface moisture fluxes
Interesting behavior emerges in the mass flux and cloud fraction, in the
sense that they do not differ much
An idealized framework
radiative cooling Qr
 l
 l
1  Fr F
 w


t
z c p T z
z
l
subsidence warming and drying
q
q Fq
 w 
t
z z
turbulent warming and moistening
LES set-up



Two cases without wind shear (initially), without rain microphysics and with
idealized subsidence and thermodynamic profiles (thanks to Gilles Bellon)
Resolution: Dx = Dy = 50 m, Dz = 25 m Domain: 12.8 x 12.8 x 5 km
Simulation time of 60 hours, then perturbed by dU = +/- 5 m/s
LES results
U5
U10
U15
LES results
A “false” hypothesis?
Are solutions possible whereby the layer does not deepen?
F ,s dU U 
d l 
,
CDU  w
Fq,s dU U 
dq 
CDU  w
Wind speed influence in bulk models
A two–layer shallow cumulus bulk model (Albrecht’s model - modified by Bretherton and Park, 2008)
Summary and concluding remarks

Wind speed should be acknowledged as a major forcing that may
explain variability of clouds and precipitation in the trades.

In LES, stronger winds lead to larger surface moisture fluxes and an
increase in the growth rate of the layer. Because the surface heat flux
decreases instead, as more warm air is mixed in when the layer deepens,
surface buoyancy flux and cumulus updraft velocity change little. Cloud
(core) fraction and convective mass flux are also robust quantities.

A wind speed increase but zero deepening leads to an inconsistency in the
energy budget of the layer. Clouds may resolve this inconsistency by
deepening the layer.

Simple bulk concepts and well-known bulk models suggest that the
deepening response is independent of the internal dynamics of clouds and
how they mix with their environment.

Precipitation as well as the time-travelled through the trades may explain
discrepancies between observations and simulations/models.