Primates - CLAS Users

Download Report

Transcript Primates - CLAS Users

ANG 6930
Proseminar in
Anthropology IIA:
Bioanthropology
Day 4
ANG 6930
Prof. Connie J. Mulligan
Department of Anthropology
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Did everyone get their assignments
back?
• I’ve graded everything so if you didn’t get
something back, that means I didn’t get it
• You should have received:
– Quiz 1
– Questions/comments from last week
– Journal analysis abstract
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Journal analysis
• Great abstracts
– Average – 19
– Most frequent mistakes
• Forgetting to explain your choice of additional journals
• Remember to turn your graded abstract in with
your final paper
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Quiz #2
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
This week
•
•
Primate evolution, ecology and behavior
•
•
•
•
Primatology as anthropology
Diversity of living primates
Primate models for human evolution and behavior
Comparison of humans and other primates
Reading
–
–
The Human Species, Chpts 5 (Primates), 6 (Primate behavior and ecology),
7 (The human species)
Course packet
•
•
•
•
•
•
Martin RD. 2002. Primatology as an essential basis for biological anthropology.
Evolutionary Anthropology 11:3-6.
Strier KB. 2003. Primate behavioral ecology: From ethnography to ethology
and back. American Anthropologist 105:16-27.
Rieseberg LH and Livingstone K. 2003. Chromosomal speciation in primates.
Science 300:267-268.
Khaitovich P et al. 2005. Parallel patterns of evolution in the genomes and
transcriptomes of humans and chimpanzees. Science 309:1850-1854.
Amici et al. 2010. Monkeys and apes: Are their cognitive skills really so
different? American Journal of Physical Anthropology 143: 188-197.
Judson O. 2008. Wanted: Intelligent aliens, for a research project, New York
Times blog
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Next week
•
Hominoid to hominin
•
•
•
•
•
Dating the ape-human split
Australopiths
Early hominin subsistence and social organization
Origins of genus Homo
–
Homo erectus, Neanderthals and other archaic humans
Reading
–
The Human Species, Chpts 9 (Primate origins and evolution), 10 (Beginnings of
human evolution), 11 (Origin/evolution of genus Homo), 12 (Evolution of archaic humans)
–
Course packet
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
“A new kind of ancestor: Ardipithecus unveiled”, Science, 326:36-40.
“Candidate human ancestor from South Africa sparks praise and debate”, Science, 328:154155.
Klein RG. 2009. Darwin and the recent African origin of modern humans. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 106:16007-16009.
“New statistical model moves human evolution back three million years” ScienceDaily,
11/9/2010.
Teaford MR and Ungar PS. 2000. Diet and the evolution of the earliest human ancestors.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97:13506-13511.
Conroy GC. 2002. Speciosity in the early Homo lineage: Too many, too few, or just about
right? Journal of Human Evolution 43:759-766.
Premo LS and Hublin J-J. 2009. Culture, population structure, and low genetic diversity in
Pleistocene hominins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:33-37.
Hublin JJ. 2009. The origin of Neanderthals. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 106:16022-16027.
“Tales of a prehistoric human genome” Science 2009, 323:866-871.
Optional (on Sakai) – Noonan JP. Neanderthal genomics and the evolution of
modern
Mulligan,
Copyright 2011
humans. Genome Research 20:547-553.
All rights reserved
Terminology
• Chromosome
• Genome
• DNA
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Terminology
• Chromosome
– Molecules in the nucleus that carry
genetic information in a linear
sequence
• Genome
– All the genetic information in an
organism, i.e. one representative of
each chromosome
• Nuclear, mitochondrial, chloroplast
• DNA
– Deoxyribonucleic acid
– The molecular basis of heredity
• Chromosomes are composed of
DNA
• The genome is composed of
chromosomes
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Terminology
• Locus
• Gene
• Allele
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Terminology
• Locus - region of the
genome
• Gene - DNA sequence
that encodes a protein
• Allele - one of several
alternative forms of a
DNA sequence, can be
coding or non-coding
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Introduction to
Living Primates
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Why Study Primates?
• Reasoning by homology
– Closely related species tend to be similar in
morphology and behavior
– Studying nonhuman primates gives insight into
human ancestors
• Reasoning by analogy
– Natural selection leads to similar organisms in
similar environments
– Studying biological diversity in ecological
context sheds light on evolutionary processes
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Why Study Primates?
• Primates are our closest relatives
– Morphological, biochemical, and behavioral
similarity reflects evolutionary relatedness
– Reasoning by homology
• Primates are a diverse order
– Variable ecology, diet, morphology, mating
patterns, and social structure
– Reasoning by analogy
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Forms of Primate Social
Organization


Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Solitary
• Smallest social group
• Females maintain separate home ranges with
juvenile offspring
• Males may establish own ranges or may defend
ranges of several adult females
• Adult females and males have infrequent contact,
mainly mating
• Except orangutans, all solitary primates are
prosimians
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Monogamy
• One male and one female form long-term pair
bond
– Show high levels of paternal care of offspring
• Share territory with immature offspring
• Not very common
– Characteristic of gibbons, some small New World
monkeys, a few prosimian species
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Polyandry
• One female paired with two or more males
– May be more than 1 female, but only 1 is reproductively active
• Share home range with offspring
• Not very common
– May occur among some marmosets and tamarins
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Polygyny: One-male
• Several adult females, a single resident male,
and immature offspring
• “Bachelor males” often form all-male groups
• Variable dispersal patterns
• Common among howlers, langurs, gelada
baboons
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Polygyny: Multimale-multifemale
• Most common form of primate social organization
• Several adult males, adult females, and immature offspring
– Most are female-bonded
– Males may move between coed groups, remain solitary, or join allmale groups
• Lots of variation in terms of size, composition and distribution
• Macaques, savanna baboons, some New World monkeys
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Sexual selection infanticide
hypothesis
• Hrdy (1977) proposed infanticide enhances
male reproductive success
• Continuing controversy, but growing data
– Infanticide reported in ~40 primate species
– Researchers have observed >60 infanticidal attacks
and many nonlethal attacks
– Observed in one-male and multi-male groups
• Increasing evidence confirms predictions of
hypothesis
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Infanticide linked to changes in
male membership and status
• C.P. van Schaik
reviewed 55
infanticides observed
in wild
• 47 (85%) followed
changes in male
residence or
dominance rank
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Infanticide shortens interbirth
intervals
• Lactation generally prevents conception
• Cycling resumes quickly if infant dies
• Reduces birth intervals by 25-30% in some
species
• From an evolutionary perspective, new male
can more quickly increase the proportion of
his offspring in the group
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Males do not kill their own infants
• C.P. van Schaik
– 40 of 55 infanticides committed by males not in
group at conception
– 11 of remaining cases by males not seen mating
• V. Sommer – genetic relationship impossible
or unlikely in 52 of 55 cases
• C. Borries et al.
– DNA analyses confirm killer  father in 22 of 23
cases
– Paternity unclear in other case
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Males gain reproductive benefits
• C.P. van Schaik
– Infanticidal males subsequently mated with
mother in 25 of 55 cases
– May have mated with mother in 13 other cases
• C. Borries et al.
– Documented five infanticidal attacks
– Four mothers subsequently gave birth
– In all cases, DNA identified presumed killer as
father
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Unanswered questions
• Does infanticide occur more frequently
under certain ecological conditions?
• Is there a hereditary predisposition to
commit infanticide?
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
The altruism conundrum
• Primates perform altruistic behavior in nature
– Grooming, alarm calls, food sharing
• Altruistic behaviors decrease individual fitness
 cannot evolve by natural selection
• Altruistic behaviors cannot be favored just
because the group benefits
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
W.D. Hamilton and Kin Selection
• Ordinary selection can favor altruistic behavior if
genetic relatives interact selectively
– If you increase fitness of a kin, some proportion of your genes
have increased chance of survival
• Implications
– Altruism is limited to kin
– Closer kinship encourages more altruism
• Closer kin = higher percentage of your genes
• rb > c (Hamilton’s rule)
r=
b=
c=
average coefficient of relatedness between actor and recipients
sum of fitness benefits to individuals affected by behavior
fitness cost to individual performing behavior
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Primate Diversity
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Old and new versions of primate phylogeny
Old
New
-Breaks up prosimians
-Lemurs more ancestral
- ‘Prosimians’ used casually,
but not formally
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
The primate pattern
• No single derived feature shared by all primates
• Traits well-suited to arboreal environments
– Grasping hands and feet
– Binocular (overlapping fields of vision = detail)
stereoscopic (image sent from both eyes to both
hemispheres = depth) vision
• Perceive distance and depth
• Controversy over selection of adaptations
– Arboreal hypothesis
• All traits evolved as arboreal adaptations
– Insect predation hypothesis
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
The primate pattern, cont
• Grasping hands and feet
– Opposable big toe, prehensile hands
– Flat nails instead of claws, tactile pads
– Hindlimb-dominated locomotion
• Greater reliance on sight than on smell
– Unspecialized olfactory apparatus, reduced in
diurnal primates
– Eyes moved forward, developed visual sense,
color perception
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
The primate pattern, cont
• Reproduction and life history
– Females have small litters, increased birth spacing
– Trend toward longer lives and longer periods of
gestation, infancy, childhood, and adulthood
• Requires more parental care
• Brain and behavior
–
–
–
–
Large brain compared to mammals of similar size
More complex brain anatomy
Increased learning and behavioral flexibility
Cultural transmission of new behaviors
• Food washing – began by young macaque (named Imo), taught to
all newborn infants although adults did not acquire behavior
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
• Not innate behavior, but learned behavior
All rights reserved
Remember…
• None of these traits make primates unique
– Example: dolphins have large brains, extended
juvenile dependence, and flexible social
behavior
• Not every primate possesses all these traits
– Some prosimians have claws, more developed
olfactory senses
– Humans have lost opposable big toe
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Mouse Lemur
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Ring-Tailed Lemur
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Ring-Tailed Lemur
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Blue-Eyed Lemur
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Aye-aye
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Sifaka
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Slow Loris
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Tarsier
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Squirrel Monkey
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Spider Monkey
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
White-Faced Capuchin
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Great-Nosed Proboscis
(Nasalis)
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Zanzibar Red Colobus
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Black-and-White Colobus
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Long-Tailed Macaques
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Bonnet Macaques
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Assam Macaques
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Japanese Macaques
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Japanese Macaques
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Savanna Baboon
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Olive Baboons
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Gelada Baboon
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Mandrill
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
White-Handed Gibbon
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Siamang
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Orangutan
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Orangutan
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Gorilla
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Gorilla
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Gorilla
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Bonobos
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Bonobos
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Chimpanzee
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Chimpanzee
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Chimpanzee
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Nonhuman primate biogeography
Generally restricted to the tropics
Living
Fossil only
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Evolutionary morphing
• NYCEP – New York Consortium in Evolutionary
Primatology
• Website to do 3-D reconstructions of extinct
primates
– Use DNA-based phylogenies and skulls of extant
primates to reconstruct skulls of extinct animals
• http://graphics.cs.ucdavis.edu/research/EvoMorph
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
What’s the difference between
monkeys and apes?
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
What’s the difference between
monkeys and apes?
• Monkeys have tails, apes do not
• Monkeys have smaller brains relative to body
size
• Monkey movement is quadrupedal = arms and
legs are generally of similar length so their
spine is parallel to the ground; apes have
longer arms than legs; humans have longer
legs than arms
• Apes are more closely related to humans than
monkeys
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
What do these terms mean?
• Hominoid
• Hominid
• Hominin
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
What do these terms mean?
• Hominoid (Hominoidea)
– Apes + humans
• Hominid (Hominidae)
– Humans and human-like
ancestors
• Hominin
– New term to replace hominid
(i.e. humans and human-like
ancestors) and hominid =
humans + great apes
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of Living Humans
Distribution and Environment
– Humans are the most widely distributed living
primate species.
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of Living Humans
Brain Size and Structure
– Absolute brain size is not as useful a measure of
intelligence because larger animals tend to have
larger brains.
– Alternative methods for analyzing brain size and
intelligence.
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of living humans
Figure 11.1:
Average brain
volume (cubic
centimeters) of
selected living
primates.
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of living humans
Figure 11.2: Relationship between body weight and brain
weight in primates.
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of living humans
Bipedalism
• The physical structure of human beings shows
adaptations for upright walking as the normal
mode of movement.
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of living humans
Figure 11.3: The skeletal
structure of the feet of a
chimpanzee (left) and a
modern human (right). Note
how the big toe of the human
lies parallel to the other toes,
facilitating upright walking.
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of living humans
Figure 11.5: Side view of the
skeletons of a chimpanzee
(left) and a modern human
(right), illustrating the shape
and orientation of the spine.
(adapted from Campbell, 1985)
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of living humans
Figure 11.6: The trunk skeletons
of a chimpanzee (left) and a
modern human (right) drawn to
the same size. Note the
proportionately shorter and wider
pelvis of the human being,
reflecting adaptations to upright
walking. (adapted from Campbell,
1985).
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of living humans
Canine Teeth
• Human canine teeth are small and do not project
beyond the level of the other teeth, serving much the
same function as incisor teeth.
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of living humans
Sex and Reproduction
– The fact that humans do not have the estrus cycle has
often been cited as a unique aspect of human sexuality.
• Exception – orangutans also lack an estrus cycle
– Most temperate zone animals only mate during certain
seasons and only around the time of ovulation.
– Human females cycle throughout the year and often mate
at any time during the cycle.
• Bonobos mate outside of estrus to some extent
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Characteristics of living humans
Sex and Reproduction
– Human Childbirth
• Single births
• Extended period of dependence
• Childbirth difficult and complex, requires assistance
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Chimp cognition and behavior
• Cooperation and its limitations
– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mv8rfJmC
Pk&feature=related
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Discussion
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Evolution
• What is orthogenesis?
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Social structure
• Do you think social structure (monogamy vs
multi-male, female dominance, etc) is more
genetically determined or ecologically
determined?
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Are humans uniquely different
from other primates?
• Lots of genetic research is looking for something
different in humans that signals the unique evolutionary
path towards humans
– Is there a human gene?
– How about a specific signal of natural selection along a human
lineage, i.e. positive selection for a gene involved in language
or differential expression of a gene?
– Differential expression of genes between humans and others?
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved
Khaitovich et al., 2005, Science
• Compared expression levels of genes active in
brain, heart, liver, kidney and testis in humans and
chimps
– How do you interpret these results?
Mulligan, Copyright 2011
All rights reserved