Transcript PowerPoints

Predicting Invaders and
Impacts
Can it be done?
Lindsay Berk
Papers


Ricciardi, A. Predicting the impacts of an
introduced species from its invasion history: an
empirical approach applied to zebra mussel
invasions. Freshwater Biology 48: 972-981.
Byers et al. Directing research to reduce the
impacts of nonindigenous species.
Conservation Biology 16: 630-640.
Dreissena polymorpha-case study



During the past 200 years, D. polymorpha
spread across Europe through canals and by
boats
In mid-1980s, D. polymorpha was introduced
to the Great Lakes region from Europe, as
larvae released with ship ballast water
Since that time, zebra mussels have had
negative effects on native mussels, boats, and
water pipes, seriously restricting the flow of
water
Ricciardi 2003
http://nas.er.usgs.gov/zebra.mussel/
http://nas.er.usgs.gov/zebra.mussel/
http://www.nationalatlas.gov/zmussels1.html
Can you predict the impacts of
invaders?



Predictions developed empirically through data
synthesis
If the invasion history is known, Ricciardi
suggests to compare the impacts in different
ecosystems where the invasion has been
documented
If the invasion history is not known or it is a
new introduction, Ricciardi suggests predicting
the invasion by comparison with functionally
similar species
Impacts


Increase in D. polymorpha increase in
density of macroinvertebrates, 2-10x
Increase in D. polymorpha increase in
density of amphipod crustacean, Gammarus
fasciatus, a food source for several benthic
fishes.
Fig. 1Changes in the
density of
macroinvertebrates
(excluding Dreissena)
before and after
Dreissena
colonization.
Points above the 1 : 1
line indicate a positive
change.

Strong negative impact on US native
freshwater mussels of the Unionidae family,
by fouling and competition
Fig. 5 Proportion of freshly
killed unionids as a function
of the Dreissena-unionid
mass ratio
Questions


Ricciardi asserts that even a crude model will
help in invasive management and allocation of
limited resources-do you agree? Could a crude
model be misleading and/or worse than no
model at all?
“A predictive understanding of the impacts of
a known invader might be attainable if the
impacts are a function of quantifiable
interactions between the invader and its new
environment”(972) –is this really the case or
the exception?




Can you predict impacts by comparison with
functionally similar species? Would this work
for already established organisms? Could this
be used as a decision tool for exotics that have
not been introduced yet?
What about invaders magnifying the
consequences of subsequent invaders?
Is the occurrence and timing of individual
invasions as “unpredictable as earthquakes”?
If so, can you effectively model invasives? Is
it again a case by case problem?
Next Steps

Where do we go from here?
Directing Research
Byers et al.
Some Directions:
Prioritize what is research is needed with limited
resources available
 Impact-which invasive will have large impact, and
what controls variation of impact?
 Ecosystem engineers: alter ecosystem function,
through which mechanisms?
 Better understanding of “lag phases”
 What population level should invasives be held at?
Approaches:
 Experimental analyses of known invasive
impacts, derive generalizations and predictions
 Examine invasion history, behavior is often
similar for multiple invasions
 Ecological modelling
 Remote Sensing
 GIS
Action:
 Biocontrol, manual eradication, herbicides,
and risk assessment (costs of options)
Questions

What is most needed at this moment?



Pick the top research question from Table 1 or ask
a new one
Is the future dim for native species?
Should we modify our research goals to fit
practical needs?
Remote Sensing of Invaders


Underwood, E., S. Ustin, and D. DiPietro,
2003. Mapping nonnative plants using
hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing of
Environment 86: 150-161
Used data from airborne visible/infrared
imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS) to map the
abundance of ice plant (Carpobrotus edulis)
and jubata grass (Cortaderia jubata) on the
central coast of California.
Study site
http://www.nps.gov/goga/parklabs/library/plantguide
http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/
Study site depicted in this color infrared image.
Vegetation is shown as red yet it is impossible to differentiate invasives.
Study site depicted using AVIRIS imagery to detect invasive species
Loose Ends?









Enemy Release Hypothesis
Landscape ecology of invasive spread-fragmentation
Invasibility of communities-biotic resistance
Allee effect
Invasive traits
Exotic invasives and diversity
Ecosystem function
Invasion genetics
Biocontrol