Transcript Slides - grapes-3

Introduction to Particle Detection
Winter School on AstroParticle Physics@ Ooty
21st - 29th December, 2014
1
Particle Physics
Ultimate deconstruction : Establish working of the universe
starting at the most microscopic level with proofs
Standard model : An extremely successful paradigm of most all
observed phenomena proved by experiments
-decay
2
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Fundamental building blocks
(matter & fields)
Anti-particles
 All particles have their corresponding anti-particles
 All matter particles has spin ½, called fermions
 All exchange force field particles (quanta) have spin 1, called bosons (except gravity)
3
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Standard Model at a glance
Weak coupling strength increases as
the interaction energy increases,
inspired the idea of unification of EM
and Weak forces at a high enough
energy; Electroweak unification
verified (exp): Standard Model
vindicated
4
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Particle discoveries
Particles discovered 1898 - 1964
Particles discovered 1964 - present
Higgs
B-factory era starts here
5
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
LHC era starts here
22rd Dec. 2014
Why do we accelerate particles ?
• To take existing objects apart
• 1803 J. Dalton’s indivisible atom
atoms of one element can combine with atoms of
other element to make compounds, e.g. water is
made of oxygen and hydrogen (OH)
• 1896 M. & P. Curie find atoms decay
• 1897 J. J. Thomson discovers electron
• 1906 E. Rutherford: gold foil experiment
• Physicists break particles by shooting other
particles on them
6
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Why do we accelerate particles ?
 (2)
To create new particles
 1905 A. Einstein: energy is matter
E=mc2
 1930 P. Dirac: math problem predicts antimatter
 1930 C. Anderson: discovers positron
 1935 H.Yukawa: nuclear forces (forces between protons
and neutrons in nuclei) require pion
 1936 C. Anderson: discovers pion muon
 First experiments used cosmic rays that are accelerated for
us by the Universe
 are still of interest as a source of extremely energetic
particles not available in laboratories
7
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Generating particles
 Before accelerating particles, one has to create them
 electrons: cathode ray tube
(think your TV)
 protons: cathode ray tube
filled with hydrogen
 It’s more complicated for other particles (e.g.
antiprotons), but the main principle remains the same
8
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Basic accelerator physics
 Lorentz Force:
F = qE + q(vB)
 magnetic force: perpendicular to velocity, no acceleration
(changes direction)
 electric force: acceleration
9
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Surfing the electromagnetic wave
 Charged particles ride the EM wave
 create standing wave
 use a radio frequency cavity
 make particles arrive on time
 Self-regulating:
 slow particle  larger push
 fast particle  small push
10
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Surfing the electromagnetic wave
11
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Cyclotron
 1929 E.O. Lawrence
 The physics: centripetal force
mv2/r = Bqv
 Particles follow a spiral in a constant magnetic field
 A high frequency alternating voltage applied between D-electrodes
causes acceleration as particles cross the gap
 Advantages: compact design (compared to linear accelerators),
continuous stream of particles
 Limitations: synchronization lost as particle velocity approaches
the speed of light
12
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Hadron vs electron colliders
electron proton
Point-like particle
yes
no
Uses full beam energy
yes
no
Transverse energy sum
zero
zero
Longitudinal energy sum
zero
Synchrotron radiation
large
nonzero
small
13
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Large Electron-Positron collider
 Location: CERN (Geneva, Switzerland)
 accelerated particles: electrons and positrons
 beam energy: 45104 GeV, beam current: 8 mA
 the ring radius: 4.5 km
 years of operation: 19892000
14
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Tevatron
 Location: Fermilab (Batavia, IL)
 accelerated particles: protons and anti-protons
 beam energy: 1 TeV, beam current: 1 mA
 the ring radius: 1 km
 in operation since 1983
15
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
LHC Accelerator
accelerated particles: protons
beam energy: 7 TeV, beam current: 0.5 A
•30,000 tons of 8.4T dipole magnets
(1232 magnets)
•Energy 80 million times •Cooled to 1.9K with 96 tons of
larger than 5’’ cyclotron liquid helium
•More then $8 billion
•Energy of beam = 362 MJ
•More than 15 years
• 15 kg of Swiss chocolate
16
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Future of accelerators
 International Linear Collider: 0.53 TeV
 awaiting directions from LHC findings
 political decision of location
 Very Large Hadron Collider (magnet development ?):
40200 TeV
 Muon Collider (source ?) 0.54 TeV
 lepton collider without synchrotron radiation
 capable of producing many more Higgs particles
compared to an e+e collider
17
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Conclusions
 Motivation for particle acceleration
 understand matter around us
 create new particles
 Particle accelerator types
 electrostatic: limited energy
 AC driven: linear or circular
 Modern accelerators
 TeVatron, LHC
 accelerators to come: ILC, VLHC, muon collider…
18
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Event in BELLE Detector
Lead to measure CP violation and
Nobel Prize in Physics 2008
19
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
p-p collisions at the LHC
Protons are not simply
u, u, d quarks at high
energies, but a
complex mix of gluons,
quarks, virtual quarkantiquark pairs:
Proton Structure
Functions
p
p
Z  μμ
20
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Detectors and particle physics
 Detectors allow one to detect particles 
experimentalists study their behavior
new particles are found by direct observation
or by analyzing their decay products
theorists predict behavior of (new) particles
experimentalists design the particle detectors
21
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Overview of particle detectors
 What do particle detectors measure ?
 spatial location
 trajectory in an EM field  momentum
 distance between production and decay point 
lifetime
 energy
 momentum + energy  mass
 flight times
 momentum/energy + flight time  mass
22
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Natural particle detectors
 A very common particle detector: the eye
 detected particles: photons
 sensitivity: high (single photons)
 spatial resolution: decent
 dynamic range: excellent (11014)
 energy range: limited (visible light)
 energy discrimination: good
 speed: modest (~10 Hz, including processing)
23
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Modern detector types
 Tracking detectors
 detect charged particles
 principle of operation: ionization
 two basic types: gas and solid
 Scintillators
 sensitive to single particles
 very fast, useful for online applications
 Calorimeters
 measure particle energy
 usually measure energy of a bunch of particles (“jet”)
 modest spatial resolution
 Particle identification systems
 recognize electrons, charged pions, charged kaons, protons
24
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Tracking detectors
 A charged track ionizes the gas
 10—40 primary ion-electron paris
 multiplication 3—4 due to secondary ionization
 typical amplifier noise 1000 e—
 the initial signal is too weak to be effectively detected !
 as electrons travel towards cathode, their velocity increases
 electrons cause an avalanche of ionization (exponential increase)
 The same principle (ionization + avalanche) works for solid state
tracking detectors
 dense medium  large ionization
 more compact  put closer to the interaction point
 very good spatial resolution
25
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Calorimetry
 The idea: measure energy by total absorption
 also measure location
 the method is destructive: particle is stopped
 detector response proportional to particle energy
 As particles traverse material, they interact
producing a bunch of secondary particles
(“shower”)
 the shower particles undergo ionization (same
principle as for tracking detectors)
 It works for all particles: charged and neutral
26
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Electromagnetic calorimeters
 Electromagnetic showers occur due to
 Bremsstrahlung: similar to synchrotron radiation,
particles deflected by atomic EM fields
 pair production: in the presence of atomic field, a photon
can produce an electron-positron pair
 excitation of electrons in atoms
 Typical materials for EM calorimeters: large charge
atoms, organic materials
 important parameter: radiation length
27
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Hadronic calorimeters
 In addition to EM showers, hadrons (pions, protons,
kaons) produce hadronic showers due to strong
interaction with nuclei
 Typical materials: dense, large atomic weight (uranium,
lead)
 important parameter: nuclear interaction length
 In hadron shower, also creating non detectable particles
(neutrinos, soft photons)
 large fluctuation and limited energy resolution
28
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Muon detection
 Muons are charged particles, so using tracking detectors
to detect them
 Calorimetry does not work – muons only leave small
energy in the calorimeter (said to be “minimum
ionization particles”)
 Muons are detected outside calorimeters and additional
shielding, where all other particles (except neutrinos)
have already been stopped
 As this is far away from the interaction point, use gas
detectors
29
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Detection of neutrinos
 In dedicated neutrino experiments, rely on their
interaction with material
 interaction probability extremely low  need huge
volumes of working medium
 In accelerator experiments, detecting neutrinos is
impractical – rely on momentum conservation
 electron colliders: all three momentum components
are conserved
 hadron colliders: the initial momentum component
along the (anti)proton beam direction is unknown
30
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Multipurpose detectors
 Today people usually combine several types of various detectors in a
single apparatus
 goal: provide measurement of a variety of particle characteristics
(energy, momentum, flight time) for a variety of particle types
(electrons, photons, pions, protons) in (almost) all possible
directions
 also include “triggering system” (fast recognition of interesting
events) and “data acquisition” (collection and recording of
selected measurements)
 Confusingly enough, these setups are also called detectors (and
groups of individual detecting elements of the same type are called
“detector subsystems”)
31
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Generic HEP detector
32
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014
Conclusions
 Particle detectors follow simple principles
 detectors interact with particles
 most interactions are electromagnetic
 imperfect by definition but have gotten pretty good
 crucial to figure out which detector goes where
 Three main ideas
 track charged particles and then stop them
 stop neutral particles
 finally find the muons which are left
33
Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras
22rd Dec. 2014