981215-canarie-dvh

Download Report

Transcript 981215-canarie-dvh

Internet2: Developments
and Directions
Doug Van Houweling
[email protected]
CANARIE
Third Annual Advanced Networks Workshop
December 15-16, 1998
Internet2 Project Goals
Enable new generation of applications
Re-create leading edge R&E network
capability
Transfer capability to the global
production Internet
Outline
Review of progress
Directions for 1999
Status Updates on:
• Abilene
• QBone
• Middleware
Internet2 in a global context
Progress
2+ years ago:
Internet2 Project formed
October 1996
1+ year ago:
UCAID Incorporated
October 1997
8 months ago:
Abilene Launched
April 1998
Today
135 universities
44 corporations
7 gigaPoPs connected to vBNS
Abilene demonstrated/nearing
production
Abilene peering with vBNS,
CANARIE
QoS -- QBone initiative launched
Middleware initiative launched
Challenges
Maintain focus on advanced Internet
• Production Internet rapidly gaining strength
through incremental improvements
• Intranets and extranets growing
Higher education needs a production
Internet capable of serving missioncritical applications
• and so does the rest of the world!
Internet2 implements advanced
capabilities
Next Steps
Continue to interconnect member
desktops and servers at high speed
Continue to support advanced
applications development
• focus on multi-campus implementations
Adopt, develop and implement
• QoS end-to-end
• middleware end-to-end
• new business models
Abilene
Objectives for the Abilene
Network
High availability backbone network
for advanced research applications
Separate network to test advanced
network capabilities
Quality of Service standards to
guarantee types of availability
Multicasting and advanced security
“Separate network” to do
network research
Progress
Demonstrated September 1998
In production January 1999
Add participants during 1999
Agreement to peer with vBNS,
CA*net II
Interconnecting at STAR
TAP/NGIX/Chicago, NGIX West,
NGIX East (when decided)
The Abilene Network
Seattle
Eugene
Westfield
Minneapolis
New York
Cleveland
Detroit
Salt Lake City
Pittsburgh
Lincoln
Sacramento
Oakland
Indianapolis
Newar
Trent
k
on
Philadelp
Wilmington
hia
Columbus
Washington
Denver
Kansas City
Raleigh
Albuquerque
Nashville
Los Angeles
Atlanta
Anaheim
Phoenix
Dallas
Abilene
Router Node
Access Node
New Orleans
Planned 1999
Houston
Peering Point - NGIX
Miami
33 Total Access Points
New Haven
The Abilene Network
Seattle
Eugene
Minneapolis
Westfield
New York New Haven
Cleveland
Detroit
Salt Lake City
Pittsburgh
Lincoln
Sacramento
Oakland
Indianapolis
Newar
k
Trent
Philadelp
on
Wilmington
hia
Columbus
Washington
Denver
Kansas City
Raleigh
Albuquerque
Nashville
Los Angeles
Atlanta
Anaheim
Phoenix
Dallas
Abilene
Router Node
Access Node
GigaPop Connected Participant
(ALL COLORS)
GigaPoPs
New Orleans
Directly Connected Participant
UW Pacific North West One Net
OARnet
CENIC
Texas
Pittsburgh (CMU)
Westnet
MREN
MCNC
Great Plains
MERIT
MAX
MAGPI
Houston
Miami
33 Total Access Points
Serving 64 Members
The QBone Initiative
What is “the QBone”
Vision
• Significant subset of the Internet implements welldefined notions of QoS and is regarded by users
as infrastructure
Testbed
• Interdomain DiffServ testbed being built by R&E
networks
• Infrastructure only a graduate student could love
Initiative
• Internet2 initiative that includes
 QBone testbed (QIG)
 Intradomain solutions group (QSG)
QBone Call for Participation
CFP issued September 25th, 1998
Proposals due October 16th
Review complete October 30th
Participant Types
• Networks
• Network Engineering / Advanced
Development
• Applications and Middleware
Developers
• Corporate Partners
Initial Participants
13 Proposals recommended for initial
QBone Interoperability Group (QIG)
• Abilene
• CAnet*2
• iCAIR Consortium
 APAN, CTIT, EVL, Indiana University,
MREN, Nanyang Technological
University, National University of
Singapore, Northwestern University,
SingAREN, STAR TAP, SURFnet,
TransPAC
Initial Participants (QIG) - cont’d
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
IPPM Surveyor Project
Merit / University of Michigan
NCNI - North Carolina Network Initiative
NREN
NYSERNet
PSC / NLANR / CMU
Texas A&M University / Texas GigaPoP
UMN
UPenn/ UMass
vBNS
QBone Structure
QBone Interoperability Group (QIG)
• Actively building pre-production interdomain
DiffServ infrastructure
• Works on nuts-and-bolts interoperability
issues
• Specific phased demonstrations of
interdomain QoS
• Participation staged to keep group focused
QBone Structure -cont’d
QBone Solutions Group (QSG)
• Broader discussion of engineering and
deployment issues
• Includes teams that plan to join the QIG
• Focus on intradomain engineering issues
• Participation open to the Internet2
community
I2 QoS Working Group
• Architectural guardians
• Nurture QIG and QSG
QBone Milestones
Sep 25th - call for participation issued
Oct 27th - QFC met to finalize
recommendations
Nov 30th - 1st Meeting of QBone BB
Advisory Council
Dec 1st - QBone Networking Kickoff
Meeting
Jan 1st - Revised QBone Architecture
from I2QoSWG
Jan 26th - Next QIG Networking Meeting
Internet2 QoS Resources
QoS Working Group
• Home Page:
http://www.internet2.edu/qos/wg
• Interest Mailing List:
[email protected]
QBone
• Home page:
http://www.internet2.edu/qbone
Middleware
Middleware Challenges
Identify technologies that are
scalable and interoperable
Increase deployment of middleware
technologies as part of a precommercial production environment
Examples:
• Distributed storage - I2-DSI initiative
• Multicast video tools - I2-DVN initiative
Applications:
Horizontal, Vertical, Spot Solutions
Standard APIs
Middleware:
Security, Directory, Quality of Service,
Audio/Video Frameworks, Accounting,
Collaboration Frameworks, Multicast
Standard APIs
Operating system and network services
Interoperable Protocols
Technology Scope
Emphasis is on technologies that
enable developing and deploying
advanced research and education
applications across our institutions
Technology Scope
 QoS
 Digital video/audio
 Security
 Collaboration
 Directories
 Multicast
 File systems
 Measurement
 Remote instruments
 IMS
 Transaction systems
 Meta-computing
 Management
 IP telephony
 Accounting/billing
 E-commerce
 Object brokers
 Search mechanisms
 Printing
Initiative Overview
Deliverables
• Identification of a small number of key
community projects
• Information dissemination
• Demos
• Workshops
Principles
Focus on problems where
• we have a unique incentive to solve
• the benefit to our community is clear and
compelling
• results are attainable in a reasonable
timeframe
I2-Digital Video Network
Ubiquitous
Digital Video
Scalable and easy
to use
Integrated into applications
Streaming and interactive
Real-time and asynchronous (stored)
Unicast and native multicast
Single source to multi-source
Resolutions up to HDTV
Distributed Storage Initiative
Objective
Develop and deploy a reliable,
scalable, high performance network
storage capability enabling broad
access to stored video, very large
data sets, etc.
Internet2 in a global context
Internet2 International
Collaborations
Building peer to peer relationships
Looking for similar goals/objectives and
similar constituencies
Mechanism: Memoranda of Understanding
Signed: CANARIE, Stichting SURF,
NORDUnet
In process: TERENA, SingAREN, JAIRC,
APAN and others
Focus and Goals
Enable collaboration between researchers
and educators
Ensure global interoperability of advanced
technologies
Interconnect high-performance networks
• Abilene <-> CA*net II/3 interconnection/peering
agreement
Deploy QoS and other technologies
across networks
• CANARIE participation in QBone initiative
• Joint working group meetings between CANARIE and
Internet2