Wharton Medical Clinic

Download Report

Transcript Wharton Medical Clinic

Role of Private Bariatric Medical
Centres
ARE WE READY?
Dr. Sean Wharton, MD, FRCPC
Internal Medicine
Wharton Medical Clinic
Adjunct Professor – York University
Lead Author – Obesity Section - CDA Guidelines
CABPS, June 2012
Disclosures

Grants/support
CIHR
Heart and Stroke Foundation
MITACS – Research




Honoraria/Advisory Board

Novo-Nordisk
Merck
Bristol Myers Squibb
Abbott Pharmaceuticals
Eli-Lilly

AstraZeneca




Objectives

Discuss the current environment of community
based bariatric medicine

Example of a publically funded community
based weight management clinic.
Current Environment
of Medical Bariatric Centres

Tertiary




HGH
Ottawa Civic
Edmonton Capital Region – Weight Wise
Community Practices

Commercial




Weight Watchers
Bernstein’s
Herbal Magic
Evidence Based Practices



BMI (Bariatric Medical Institute)
Wharton Medical Clinic
Family Medicine Practices
Yoni Freedhoff, MD
Questions?
Community Based Bariatric Programs

Standardization

Funding

Meal Replacements
 Programs, Partial

Family Doctors or Specialists

Team
 Dietitians, nutritionists (bariatric educators), exercise
specialists, behavioural therapist, pharmacist, social work etc.
Answers
Community Bariatric Medicine

Efficient System – demand is great

Multi-disciplinary

Cost-effective

Family/childhood obesity a priority
115 Programs
Analyzed
31 Surgical Programs
2 Surgical Assessment Centres
82 Non-surgical Programs
32 Community-based (group
session, gym)
41 Primary Health Care (MD,
nurse, dietitian)
7 Hospital-based
115 Programs
ASPQ Criteria for Bariatric Programs








Rate of weight loss
Multi-disciplinary
Dietary intervention (without long term use of
VLCD)
Physical activity
Effectiveness
Safety
Approach to advertising
Cost Effectiveness

Pharmacotherapy
3/31 – surgical programs
 12/82 – non-surgical program (11 PC, 1 hosp)


BMI Criteria

32/82 nonsurgical programs did not use BMI as
entry criteria



Primary care based programs show the greatest
compliance. Encouraging – most accessible
Access to hospital-based non-surgical programs
is extremely limited.
Bariatric surgery facilites are lacking in
psychological supports, and physical activity
compared to non-surgical programs.
Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a metaanalysis of US studies

13 Studies (VLCD and HBD)



1081 pts - F/U – 4.5 years
Initial weight loss 30.8 lbs (14%)
Weight-loss maintenance 6.6 lbs (3%)

40.2% of patients maintained - 5% loss at 5 years


NNT of 2.5
25% of patients maintained - 10% loss at 5 years

NNT of 5
Anderson et al. Am J Clin Nutr, 2001
Wadden et al. NEJM; Nov 14, 2011
Important aspects of a weight
management clinic
Cost
 medical supervision
 frequent visits
 no pressure/non judgmental
 emotional support
 nutritional support
 convenient location with parking

How frequently would you like
to come to a professional centre
for a weigh in?
2%
4%
every week
8%
every 2 weeks
34%
2%
every 3 weeks
1/month
Whenever I want
50%
no answer
Wharton Medical Clinic
Weight Management Centre


Launch – May 2008
A large community based bariatric clinic –
government funded – no charge to patients
9 Internists – 3 Nephrologist, 1 cardiologist, 2 ICU,
1 rheumatologist, 1 haematologist, 1 GIM
 1 Dietitian/15 Nutritionist (Bariatric Educators)
 Behavioural Therapy Team/Physiotherapy Team
 Research Staff

Bariatric Educators

Education/Qualifications
BSc Nutrition (Guelph, UWO, Ryerson)
 Post WMC - 2 MDs, 2 Masters, 4 dietitian internship


Supervision/Quality Control



Dietitian/MDs
1/2 – 1/3 - salary of a dietitian
Significant dietary concerns – referred to the
dietitian
WMC Clinic


Adults
BMI 27-30 with 1 comorbidity, or BMI>30




? Change this to BMI 27 – 40 with 1 comorbidity,
BMI > 40 (no comorbidities needed)
Treatment of cardio-metabolic conditions
Pharmacotherapy
Surgical Referral/Medical and Psychological
Support/Pre and Post Op Management
Wharton Medical Clinic










May 2012
19,069 pts (76% women)
 3,734 pts current
75 - 100 new pts/week
No waiting list
15-20 min GROUP education session at every visit
MD sees patient at every visit
Visits q 1 – 3 weeks
Metabolic and CV Risk assessment
Evening Educational Classes
Aggressive Diabetes Management
WMC Program Flowsheet
1. FD - ASK
2. ASSESS
3. AGREE
4. ADVISE
Visit #2
BE/MD Visit
Initiate Meal Plan
Visit #1
BE/MD Visit
PMHX/Meds/Exam/
Weight Hx/Consent to
research and Goals
Baseline ECG
Bloodwork
RMR
GXT
Wt, Ht, BMR, WC/HC
Blood pressure
500 calorie/day deficit
Pedometer – walking
Resistance bands/Aqua
Organized eating
Visit q 3- 4 weeks
BE/MD Visit
SUPPORT GROUPS
5. ASSIST
WEEKLY WEIGH-INS ENCOURAGED – not billed to OHIP
Manage medically
Diabetic management
CV management
Referrals
BE #1
Notes
BE #1
Notes
BE #1
Notes
Weight, Ht, BP, WC/HC
BE #1
Notes
BE #2
Presentations
BE #1
Notes
BE #2
Presentations
BE #5
BE #4
BE #3
Individual visit
Individual visit
Individual visit
BE #1
Notes
BE #2
Presentations
BE #5
BE #4
BE #3
Individual visit
Individual visit
Individual visit
BE #1
Notes
BE #2
Presentations
BE #5
BE #4
Individual visit Individual visit
BE #3
Individual visit
WMC - Lectures
Educational Seminars

Topics







How to complete a food journal
Macro and micronutrients/label reading
meal plans/eating out
diabetic meal planning
Emotional eating
stress and weight, body image, support group
Activity – pedometers, resistance bands
RMR Machine
Comparison of Group vs. Individual
Treatment for Weight Loss: 6 months
0
Group Treatment
Individual Treatment
Preferred Non-Preferred
Preferred Non-Preferred
Weight Loss (in kg)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
p < .02
16
Renjilian, Perri et al. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69:717-721.
Barry at 404 lbs, BMI 60

Past Medical History










Diabetes Type 2
OSA – CPAP
Hypertension
High Cholesterol
Urinary incontinence
Hernia - ventral
Obesity Class III
Developmental Delay
Intertrigo
Medications


Metformin, Glyburide
Ramipril, Lipitor
Barry’s Weight Loss Graph
Barry at 231lbs, BMI 33
176lbs lost, 43% WL

Current Medical Hx

OSA


Diabetes type 2



CPAP turned down
Diet controlled
Obesity Class I
Current Medications

No medications

Off – metformin, ramipril,
glyburide. Lipitor
Feasibility of a interdisciplinary
program for weight
management in Canada
Sean Wharton MD; Sarah VanderLelie B.A.Sc;
Saaqshi Sharma M.Sc; Arya Sharma MD;
Jennifer L. Kuk PhD
Canadian Family Physician, Feb 2012;852:32-8

Descriptive sample

1085 pts (3 months), 289 pts (6 months)

77% female

Age – 49.3 + 12.5 years

BMI – 40.5 + 8.1 kg/m2
Disease
et
ab
ol
ic
Sy
nd
ro
m
e
De
pr
es
sio
n
Di
ab
et
es
Hy
Fa
pe
tty
rc
Liv
ho
er
le
st
er
ol
em
Hy
ia
pe
rt
en
sio
Os
n
te
oa
rth
rit
is
Sle
ep
Ap
ne
a
M
Number of
Patients
2500
1500
1000
84%
2000
69%
27%
Canadian Family Physician, Feb 2012;852:32-8
33%
21%
45%
27%
500
0
20%
50
47
Prevalence (%)
43
38
40
28
30
20
10
32
21
6
8
9
1
2
3
13
15
4
5
17
0
Treatment Time (months)
Wharton et al. Can FamPhys, 2012;852:32-8
6
5%
10%
Prevalence of WMC Patients attaining
5% and 10% Weight Loss (18 months)
1,562 patients
Discontinuation
(no visit in 3 months)

28.9% (N=452)
lost 4.3 kg ± 6.1
 3.7 % ± 5.0 of BW




31% - 5% weight loss
11% - 10% weight loss
8.4 ± 3.0 visits over 7.5 ± 1.4 months
Results- Prevalence of MNOB and MAOB
Clinical cutoffs
Sub-clinical cutoffs
70%
Prevalence (%)
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0
1
2
3
Baseline
4
5
0
1
2
3
Follow-up
Number of metabolic risk factors
4
5
Sex
Female
Male
Percent Weight Loss (%)
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
Ref
-6
Unadjusted data
-7
Data adjusted for independent variables: sex, age group, BMI
class, education, ethnicity and smoking status and treatment
duration)
Age Group
Percent Weight Loss (%)
0
18-49
49-64
>64
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
*
Ref
*
**
-6
-7
Unadjusted Ptrend = 0.004
Adjusted Ptrend = 0.007
BMI Category
0
OW
OBCI
OBCII
OBCIII
Weight Lost (kg)
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
Ref
*
Unadjusted Ptrend <0.0001
Adjusted Ptrend <0.0001
BMI Category
OW
OBCI
Percent Weight Loss (%)
0
OBCII
OBCIII
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
Ref
Unadjusted Ptrend = 0.60
Adjusted Ptrend = 0.84
Education
Less than HS
HS or GED
College
University
Percent Weight Loss (%)
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
Ref
Unadjusted Ptrend = 0.46
-7
Adjusted Ptrend = 0.33
Ethnicity
White
Asian
AFHeritage
Other
0
Weight Lost (kg)
-1
-2
-3
* *
-4
-5
*
-6
-7
Ref
Next steps for
Wharton Medical Clinic Research

Current Studies
Comparison metabolically normal obese vs
metabolically abnormal obese (submitted)
 Economic analysis of effectiveness data
 Analysis of attrition rates
 OSA in patients unwilling to use CPAP randomized to GLP1 analogue vs placebo
 PGX fibre in diabetics (placebo controlled)


Application of model to family medicine clinics
Recent publication for the
Wharton Medical Clinic
Research in non-surgical bariatric
medicine

We are obligated to complete research in this
area – we are still in our infancy.
Conclusion and Questions

Statement: Community based bariatric medicine
is necessary


Statement: Results from WMC are promising


Question: How are we going to pay for it?
Question: How can it get better, more efficient and
even more cost effective
Are we Ready for community based practice?

Do we have a choice?
Thank You!







Sarah Vanderlelie, BSc
Jennifer Kuk, PhD
Arya Sharma, MD
Saaqshi Sharma, MSc
Rebecca Liu, MSc
Marcia Villafranca
Blair Leonard, MD

WMC Team