Principles of Assessment for EMS by: Bob & Kirsten Elling

Download Report

Transcript Principles of Assessment for EMS by: Bob & Kirsten Elling

Principles of Patient Assessment
in EMS
By:
Bob Elling, MPA, EMT-P
&
Kirsten Elling, BS, EMT-P
Chapter 1 – Overview to Patient
Assessment
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Objectives




Describe significant changes to the approach to
assessment in the past two decades.
Discuss the importance of a standardized
approach to patient assessment.
List and describe four key factors to the
assessment approach.
List and describe six components of the
standardized approach to patient assessment.
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Introduction

The latest versions of the national
standard curricula are “assessment based”
and place more emphasis on the
assessment process in training EMS
providers.
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Importance of a
Standardized Approach


The EMS provider’s approach to patient
assessment and physical examination
must be similar for all new patients.
Four key factors must be considered:
environment, severity, medical versus
trauma, and level of care available.
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Is The Environment Safe?
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
What’s the Patient’s Severity?
Stable or Unstable
P-1, P-2, P-3, “high” or “low”?
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Medical or Trauma?



MOI
Significant
Non-significant



NOI
Responsive
Not responsive
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Level of Care





First Responder
EMT-Basic
EMT-Intermediate
EMT-Paramedic
Aeromedical
Evacuation
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Components of Assessment






Scene size-up
Initial assessment
Focused history & physical exam: trauma
Focused history & physical exam: medical
Detailed physical exam
Ongoing assessment
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
A
l
g
o
r
I
t
h
m
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Scene Size-up



Scene safe for you
and crew
Body substance
isolation precautions
needed
Is additional help
needed
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Initial Assessment







Orderly and sequential exam with correction of
life-threats
MS-ABC Priority Plan
General impression
Chief complaint (MOI/NOI)
Assess mental status
Assess airway, breathing, and circulation
Determine priority and need for ALS
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Focused History & Physical Exam:
Trauma





Significant MOI
Rapid Trauma Exam
Baseline Vital Signs
SAMPLE History
Transport (if not
already doing so)





Non-significant MOI
Focused Exam
Baseline Vital Signs
SAMPLE History
Transport as needed
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
SAMPLE History






S – signs and symptoms
A – allergies
M – medications
P – pertinent past medical history
L – last oral intake
E – events leading up to
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Focused History & Physical Exam:
Medical





Not Responsive
Rapid Physical Exam
Baseline Vital Signs
SAMPLE History
Transport (if not
already doing so)






Responsive
History of present
event (OPQRST)
SAMPLE History
Baseline Vital Signs
Focused physical
exam
Transport
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
OPQRST
Elaborate on the Chief Complaint






O – onset
P – provocation
Q – quality
R – radiation, region, referral
S – severity
T - time
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Detailed Physical Exam



Trauma with
significant MOI
Enroute to the
hospital
Assess the head, face,
eyes, nose, mouth,
neck, chest,
abdomen, pelvis,
extremities, back and
buttocks
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Ongoing Assessment




Conducted enroute to the hospital
Reassess the vital signs
Reassess initial assessment
Reassess interventions
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Conclusion





Assessment is a dynamic process
Use a standardized approach
Continually reassess
Be flexible and reprioritize as needed
Follow the assessment algorithm
© 2003 Delmar Learning, a Division of Thomson Learning, Inc.