Medical Education Outcomes Research

Download Report

Transcript Medical Education Outcomes Research

The Role of Research in Osteopathic
Medical Education
Helen Burstin, MD, MPH
Director, Center for Primary Care, Prevention and
Clinical Partnerships
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
AACOM
June 24, 2004
Overview
 About AHRQ: The Evidence
Agency
 Improving Quality and Reducing
Disparities
 Medical Education Research
 Opportunities and Challenges
New AHRQ Mission Statement
To improve the quality, safety,
efficiency, and effectiveness of
health care for all Americans
AHRQ Research Focus:
How it Differs
 Patient-centered, not disease-specific
 Dual Focus -- Services + Delivery Systems
Effectiveness research focuses on actual daily
practice, not ideal situations (“efficacy”)
 AHRQ mission includes production and use of
evidence-based information
Example: Diabetes
 NIH -- develops and tests interventions that
cure or prevent disease (what can work?)
 CDC -- evaluates health behaviors; tests
community interventions, e.g., programs to
increase exercise, improve diet (broad
population focus)
 AHRQ -- develops evidence to help clinicians
and patients select the best interventions;
evaluates quality improvement efforts (what
does work?)
AHRQ Research and
Knowledge Transfer
 Building the knowledge base:
– The Effectiveness Question: What works?
 Clinical
 Organizational
– How do we get people/systems/policymakers to do
or use what works?
 How do we support the widespread
implementation of what works?
 How do we sustain evidence based practice?
Knowledge Transfer Strategies
 Involving Users in
 Research Networks
Research Cycle
 Partnering for
Translation and
Dissemination
 Partnering for
Implementation and
Evaluation
 Research
Collaboratives
 Focus on Results
– Measuring impact
– Systematic evaluations
Implementation of Research
Findings: Debunked Assumption
Question
Hypothesis
Study
Publications
Changes in practice
This is Not a New Problem:
The Case of Scurvy
 1601-- Lancaster shows that lemon juice
supplement eliminates scurvy among sailors
 1747-- Lind shows that citrus juice supplement
eliminates scurvy
 1795 -- (194 years after discovery) British Navy
implements citrus juice supplement
Diffusion of knowledge
Clinical Procedure
Landmark Trial
Current rate of use
Flu Vaccine
Pneumococcal Vaccine
1968
1977
64% (2000)
53% (2000)
Diabetic Eye Exam
Mammography
Cholesterol Screening
1981
1982
1984
48.1% (2000)
75.5% (2001)
69.1% (1999)
Balas EA, Boren SA., Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care
Improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000.
Crossing the Quality Chasm
 There are serious problems in quality
– Between the health care we have and the care
we could have lies not just a gap but a chasm
 Recommendation: Develop strategies to
restructure clinical education to fit 21st
century health care; assess implications of
change
Overview
 About AHRQ: The Evidence
Agency
 Improving Quality and Reducing
Disparities
 Medical Education Research
 Opportunities and Challenges
RAND Study: Quality of Health
Care Often Not Optimal
Patients’ care often deficient, study says.
Proper treatment given half the time.
On average, doctors provide appropriate health care only half the
time, a landmark study of adults in 12 U.S. metropolitan areas suggests.
Medical Care
Often Not
Optimal
.Failure to Treat Patients
Fully Spans Range of
What Is Expected of
Physicians and Nurses
Medical errors corrode
quality of healthcare system
The American healthcare system,
often touted as a cutting-edge
leader in the world, suddenly
finds itself mired in serious
questions about the ability of its
hospitals and doctors to deliver
quality care to millions.
RAND Study: Quality of Health
Care Often Not Optimal
 Doctors provide appropriate health care only
about half the time
Alcohol dependence
Hip fracture
Peptic ulcer
Diabetes
Low back pain
Prenatal care
Breast cancer
Cataracts
11%
23%
33%
45%
69%
73%
76%
79%
Percentage of time
E. McGlynn, S. Asch, J. Adams, et al., The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults
in the United States, N Engl J Med, 2003
Disparities in Quality of Care for
Medicare Enrollees
80
70
60
50
40
White
Black
30
20
10
0
Eye Exam in Beta Blocker
Diabetics
post MI
Schneider et al. JAMA 2002
Follow up
post-hosp
Healthcare Research and Quality
Act (PL. 106-129)
 “Beginning in fiscal year 2003, the Secretary,
acting through the Director, shall submit to
Congress an annual report on national trends
in the quality of health care provided to the
American people.”
 Annual report to the Congress on “prevailing
disparities in health care delivery as it
relates to racial factors and socioeconomic
factors in priority populations.”
NHQR: Missed Opportunities
 Only 20.9% of patients with diabetes receive all
recommended tests
 90% of adults are screened for high blood
pressure – but only 25% are controlled
 Nearly 1/3 of adults and children with asthma do
NOT receive effective Rx
 Almost 20% of persons with a usual source of
care report that they are not asked about
medications to prevent interactions
% of heart attack patients advised to
quit smoking while hospitalized
80
Total
0-64
64-74
75-84
85 and over
60
40
20
0
Advised to quit smoking
CMS, QIO, 2000-2001
Lower-extremity amputations for adults
with diabetes per 100,000 population
80
All
Income < $25,000
Income $25,000-$34,999
Income $35,000-$44,999
Income > $45,000
60
40
20
0
Lower-extremity amputations
* HCUP, 2000
Mammograms within 2 years, women
age 40 and over
80
All
White
African American
Hispanic
Asian
American Indian
60
40
20
0
Mammogram
NHIS, 2000
Overview
 About AHRQ: The Evidence
Agency
 Improving Quality and Reducing
Disparities
 Medical Education Research
 Opportunities and Challenges
Setting the Context: Medical Education
 What is the goal of medical education?
– To produce physicians who deliver high
quality care
 “The quality of care that the public receives is
determined to some extent by the quality of
medical education students and residents
receive.” – Commonwealth Report 2002
Medical Education Research
 What has been the state of medical education
research?
 Authority for medical education historically
resides in profession
 Intrinsic capacity to self-regulate
Lack of patient outcomes in
medical education research
 Review of 600 research articles published in
medical education journals (1996-98)
 Only 4 measured clinical outcomes of patients
 Half measured trainee performance
 34% measured trainee satisfaction
Prystowsky and Bordage. Med Ed 2001; 35.
Medical Education Research
 Past 30 years have focused on:
– Basic research on reasoning
– Use of knowledge
– Problem based learning
– Performance assessment (OSCE, std patients)
– Provision of continuing education
Norman, G. BMJ 2002;324
Lack of patient outcomes in
medical education research
 Call for greater link between practitioner
performance and education
 “The fundamental mission of medical education
is to educate trainees to care for patients.
Accordingly, it behooves medical education
researchers to evaluate more fully the effects of
medical education on the entire spectrum of
participants and outcomes.”
Commonwealth Report 2002
 Principle: Academic health centers should be
held accountable for their performance in
educating the nation’s physicians.
 Finding: The available data are insufficient to
judge the performance of academic health
centers in discharging their education
responsibilities beyond establishing a minimum
level of competency.
Why haven’t we studied patient
outcomes in medical education?
 Focus on undergraduate education
 Students able to overcome educational
interventions
 Not able to conduct randomized, blinded trials
 No reliable data on outcomes
 No money for research
Why we should study medical
education outcomes
 Medicare is largest supporter of graduate
medical education
– $7.8 billion in 2000
– >100,000 medical residents in training
 Over 75% of medical schools receive public
subsidies
– At least $2 billion
 Better available methodology and data
Why we should study medical
education outcomes
 Accountability in medical education
 “American public, policymakers, and private
health care managers have a pressing stake in
the health of our nation’s medical education
enterprise.”
 Government already involved in licensing,
financing
Past and current efforts
 Expert meetings:
– 1993 BHPr-AAMC agenda setting conference
– 2001 AHRQ-HRSA co-sponsored expert meeting
 ACGME Outcome Project – Competencies:
–
–
–
–
–
–
Patient care
Medical knowledge
Interpersonal and communication skills
Professionalism
Practice-based learning and improvement
Systems-based practice
Voltage Drops to Quality
Health Professions Training
1. Communication skills
2. Full range of settings
3. Collaborative training
4. Learn evidence-based medicine
5. Use tools to manage knowledge
6. Share knowledge with patients
7.High-Quality Care Delivered
Quality Care
Role of quality improvement
 How do physicians learn about CQI?
 What is effect of medical education upon
– Ability to change and adapt?
– Ability to improve practice?
 Do physicians trained in one system bring
those skills to another system?
Role of quality improvement
 Medical education research needs to
demonstrate that trainees
– Can become lifelong learners
– Ability to identify inadequacies
– Obtain new knowledge and skills
– Translate knowledge into care improvement
Theoretical Model
 Describes continuum of education
 Contribution of education to physician
development
– Attitudes
– Skills
– Knowledge
 Interaction with health care system to produce
outcomes
Professional
Workforce
Evidence Based
Medicine
Medical Education
UME
GME
CME
Intermediate Outcomes
Physicians'
Knowledge - Skills - Behaviors
Information
Technology
Payment
systems
Patient Outcomes
Safe-Timely-Patient-centered
Effective-Efficient-Equitable
Health Care System
Professional
Workforce
Evidence Based
Medicine
Medical Education
UME
GME
CME
Intermediate Outcomes
Physicians'
Knowledge - Skills - Behaviors
Information
Technology
Payment
systems
Patient Outcomes
Safe-Timely-Patient-centered
Effective-Efficient-Equitable
Health Care System
Medical Education
 Describes continuum of education
 UME – knowledge-focused
 GME – apprenticeship, better differentiated
 CME – discrete educational interventions
 Does GME trump UME?
Professional
Workforce
Evidence Based
Medicine
Medical Education
UME
GME
CME
Intermediate Outcomes
Physicians'
Knowledge - Skills - Behaviors
Information
Technology
Payment
systems
Patient Outcomes
Safe-Timely-Patient-centered
Effective-Efficient-Equitable
Health Care System
Intermediate Outcomes
 Bulk of medical education research
 Knowledge Testing
– Board certification
– Skills testing
 Need evidence about link between these and
clinical outcomes
Intermediate Outcomes
 Examples
– ACGME core competencies
– OSCEs
 Skills and behaviors
– Practice guidelines
– Counseling
– Shared decision-making
Professional
Workforce
Evidence Based
Medicine
Medical Education
UME
GME
CME
Intermediate Outcomes
Physicians'
Knowledge - Skills - Behaviors
Information
Technology
Payment
systems
Patient Outcomes
Safe-Timely-Patient-centered
Effective-Efficient-Equitable
Health Care System
Patient Outcomes
 Finding appropriate measures
– Safe
– Effective
– Patient-centered
– Timely
– Efficient
– Equitable
Professional
Workforce
Evidence Based
Medicine
Medical Education
UME
GME
CME
Intermediate Outcomes
Physicians'
Knowledge - Skills - Behaviors
Information
Technology
Payment
systems
Patient Outcomes
Safe-Timely-Patient-centered
Effective-Efficient-Equitable
Health Care System
Health Care System Factors
 Evidence-based medicine
 Information technology
 Professional workforce
 Payment systems
 All facilitate and modulate care delivery
Overview
 About AHRQ: The Evidence
Agency
 Improving Quality and Reducing
Disparities
 Medical Education Research
 Opportunities and Challenges
How has practice changed?
Percent of Americans Saying
“I Have A Chronic Condition”
66%
70%
58%
60%
50%
35%
40%
30%
20%
24%
15%
10%
0%
18-29
30-39
40-49
Age
50-64
Chronic Illness and Caregiving Survey, Harris 2000
65+
Beneficiaries With 5 or More Chronic Conditions Account
for Two-Thirds of Medicare Spending
0 Chronic
Conditions
1%
5+ Chronic
Conditions
68%
1 Chronic
Condition
3%
2 Chronic
Conditions
6%
3 Chronic
Conditions
10%
4 Chronic
Conditions
12%
Source: Medicare 5% Sample, 2001
Gerry Anderson, JHU
Bridging the Quality Chasm
Where
We Are
Where We
Want To Be
Implementation
Innovation
Health IT
Diffusion
Adoption
The “CPR Adoption Gap”:
The United States Versus Others
Sweden
Netherlands
Denmark
United Kingdom
Finland
Austria
Germany
Belgium
Italy
Luxembourg
Ireland
Greece
Primary Care Physician Office
CPR Use by Country, 2002
United States
Spain
France
Portugal
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Source: "European Physicians Especially in Sweden, Netherlands, and Denmark, Lead U.S. in Use of Electronic
Medical Records." Harris Interactive Health Care News 2(16).
100%
“We have wonderful technology,
but some grocery stores have better
technology than our hospitals and clinics.”
Secretary Tommy Thompson
Chicago Medical School Commencement
June 7, 2002
AHRQ: FY ’04 HIT Investment
 $60M initiative:
– $26M: to implement proven technologies in small
and rural communities where HIT penetration has
been low
– $24M: targeted for developing, implementing, and
evaluating the use of new and innovative
technologies to improve patient safety and quality
of care in diverse health care settings
– $10M: targeted for clinical data standards and
interoperability
Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act
 Health IT Provisions
– Electronic Prescription Program
– Grants to Physicians – ePrescribing systems
– Telemedicine Demonstrations Projects
– Medicare Care Management Performance
Demonstration
– Council for Technology and Innovation
– Commission on Systemic Interoperability
Diffusion of Innovation
 “Invention is hard; dissemination is much more
difficult”.
 A problem for all industries.
 Influences on rate of diffusion:
– Perception of innovation
– Characteristics of individuals who adopt change
– Contextual and managerial factors
Questions in Search of Answers
 Linking knowledge development to policy
levers (e.g., payment; regulation): role of
‘demonstrations’
 When is “good enough”?
 Vocabulary and pathways for translation of
knowledge-based interventions underdeveloped
 Concurrent -- or sequential -- evaluation and
translation?
Knowledge Transfer Strategies
 Involving Users in
 Research Networks
Research Cycle
 Partnering for
Translation and
Dissemination
 Partnering for
Implementation and
Evaluation
 Research
Collaboratives
 Focus on Results
– Measuring impact
– Systematic evaluations
Next Steps in Medical
Education Research
 Need to catalyze research that examines
linkage between quality health care and
medical education
 Commitment to patient outcomes
 Need to weave medical education back into the
fabric of systems improvement