Transcript TETRA-1/Tetrapol/P25/GSM-R mission critical Data

European PPDR Broadband situation
CEPT/ECC CPG-PTA Mainz Januari 2013
Hans Borgonjen
LEWP-RCEG (Chair Forerunner/Broadband)
Chairman TCCA-CCBG User&operator group
Platforms / Agenda
• LEWP - RCEG
(Law Enforcement Working Party – Radio Communication Expert Group)
- ‘LEWP Matrix’ + LEWP-RCEG inputs to CEPT
• CEPT/ECC WGFM PT 49
- Harmonisation of Radio Spectrum for PPDR
• European Commission
- RSPG + RSPP text
• TCCA - CCBG (Tetra & Critical Communication Association)
(Critical Communication Broadband Group)
- CCBG user+operator requirement group: ‘umbrella document’
- ‘Time line’ (Roadmap)
- ‘Strategic Case’ (Business Case + Social-economical aspects)
Mission critical communication
for Public Safety
‘Mission critical mobile voice’ – lessons learned
 1 common standard.
 1 harmonised frequency band: 2x5 MHz in 380-400 MHz
BUT: We need more data in the field
‘Mission critical mobile Broadband’
 1 common standard: LTE + specific extra’s
 1 harmonised frequency band
Goal: Being part of the ‘worldwide LTE ECO system’
Digital voice networks – Public Safety
Q1 2013
Key
Nationwide TETRA
Italy
Ireland
Regional TETRA
Poland
Estonia
Nationwide TETRA
Greece
under construction
Bulgaria
Portugal
Project in progress
Slovenia
likely to be TETRA
Romania
Lithuania
Tetrapol
Isle of Man
No project known
Vatican State
Airwave - UK
IRJA - Iceland
VIRVE - Finland
Pro-M - Hungary
RAKEL- Sweden
Nodnett - Norway
ASTRID - Belgium
TetraNet - Denmark
Digitalfunk - Austria
C2000 - Netherlands
BOS Digitalfunk – Germany
All in 380-400 MHz band
1
The Public Safety World
-
Mission critical operations, information and communication
Working under stress + high risks
Mobile communication is oftens the only ‘lifeline’
It has to work ALWAYS,
 especcially when everything else fails
 frontline officers must trust the solution.
 PPDR cannot operate with ‘Best Effort networks’
Train crash Halle Belgium - Feb 2010
House Committee on
Homeland Security
Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis III agreed that law enforcement can’t
rely on commercial carriers for public-safety emergency communications.
“In the minutes immediately following the attacks, cell-phone communication was
ineffective and virtually non-existent,” Davis said. “For this reason, radio
communications for first responders became the only means to deploy forces and
manage the operations. These frequencies play a critical role during a major
incident and allow us to do our jobs properly.”
LEWP-RCEG
Law Enforcement Working Party (LEWP)
Radiocommunication Expertgroup (RCEG)
Broadband + Frequencies
Radio experts from all countries
 Governmental operators, police, MoI / Justice
 Lot of expertise from national radio projects
RCEG: 2 subgroups
ISI + Forerunner Group
Expert group on radio technology + frequencies
Task Forerunner Group:
long term solution mobile broadband data
 Harmonised technical solution
 Harmonised frequency band(s)
Council - COMIX recommendation
Effective cross-border cooperation requires adequate
communication capabilities including interoperable
radio communication systems in border areas and
between operational services from different Member States
In the long term, law-enforcement and public-safety radio
communication systems will need to support and to be able
to exchange high-speed mobile data information;
current law-enforcement, public-safety and commercial
networks may not be able to support this
Council - COMIX recommendation
RECOMMENDS that
The Electronic Communication Committee (CEPT / ECC)
be tasked to study the possibility of obtaining sufficient
additional frequency allocation below 1GHz for the
development of future law-enforcement and public-safety
voice and high-speed data networks
‘Spectrum saves lives’
Council - COMIX recommendation
RECOMMENDS that
European standardisation bodies be invited to start
producing a European standard satisfying law-enforcement
and public-safety services' operational requirements
regarding high-speed data communication and roaming
functionality in the medium term
LEWP-RCEG activities: the ‘Matrix’
LEWP user requirement matrix high speed data
◦
◦
◦
◦
Known as the “LEWP Matrix”
All ministries ‘signed’ the Matrix
CEPT-Admistrations confirmed the Matrix
It is used as a justification for BB PPDR Spectrum
(ECC Report BB PPDR: ‘CEPT-199’)
PublicSafety highspeed user requirements
Type of application +
services
throughput
p/s per
session
use per
month per
user
Number
of users
mobility
(using while
moving)
quality of
experience (can
there be a
hiccup in the
connection)
Availability/
start-up
time
timeliness
continuous
operational
availability
(mission
critical level)
A(V)LS data to CCC
low
high
high
high
medium
ready
high
high
A(V)LS data return
medium
high
medium
high
medium
ready
high
high
Video from/to CCC for
following + intervention
high
low
medium
high
low
ready when
vehicle is
ready
medium
high
Video for fixed
observation
medium
(high on hdd)
high
low
low
low
low
medium
medium
Video on location
(disaster or event
area)
high
low
low
low
medium
Take along
on ad hoc
basis
medium
high; availability
at Golden Hour
essential
Video conferencing
operations
medium
low
low
low
low
low
medium
low
LOCATION DATA
MULTI MEDIA
Type of application +
services
throughput
p/s per
session
use per
month per
user
Number
of users
mobility
(using while
moving)
quality of
experience (can
there be a
hiccup in the
connection)
Availability/
start-up
time
timeliness
continuous
operational
availability
(mission
critical level)
Photo broadcast
medium
low
medium
high
low
ready
low
medium
Photo to select group
medium
low
low
high
low
ready
low
medium
PDA PIMsync
medium
high
low
high
low
ready
low
low
Mobile workspace +
(incl public internet)
medium
medium
low
high
low
ready
low
low
medium
low
medium
low
high
ready
medium
high
OFFICE
APPLICATIONS
DOWNLOAD
OPERATIONAL
INFORMATION
Incident information
download (text +
images) from CCC to
fieldunits + Netcentric
working
LEWP-RCEG inputs on frequencies
Letters under Swedish + Cyprus presidency
to ECC, CEPT-FM, PT49
- Stating the importance of CEPT-FM-PT49
- Offer to continue to cooperate
- Stating the earlier LEWP inputs
Letter under Irish presidency as reaction on
EC RSPG draft opinion
Stating the importance of harmonised PPDR
spectrum for mission critical mobile Broadband
Statement from LEWP-RCEG on WRC15
to CPG, CPG-PTA, CEPT-WGFM, FM49
“Having recognized that frequency bands in the 700 MHz band are increasingly
identified on a global scale (outside CEPT/EU) for broadband PPDR
communications, LEWP-RCEG strongly encourage CEPT / ECC to take all
regulatory actions possible to ensure that also European nations prepare and
adopt a common position supporting the identification of the 700 MHz band
in Region 1 under Agenda Item 1.3 of the World Radio Conference 2015
(WRC15), recognising it will be a national decision which band(s) is/are
selected for mobile broadband PPDR in each country.
In this respect, assuming there will be a positive decision for PPDR Broadband
frequencies, an amendment of the PPDR frequencies for Region 1 listed in
WRC resolution 646 would be logic, to include those new frequencies.
In this way the European Law Enforcement organisations can be safeguarded the
future access to affordable, capable of roaming into commercial networks when
necessary, and cross-border interoperable broadband communications
equipment.”
RSPP
Radio Spectrum Policy Program
RSPP Art. 8(3), Quote
<<The Commission shall, in cooperation with the
Member States seek to ensure that sufficient spectrum
is made available under harmonised conditions to
support the development of safety services and the
free circulation of related devices as well as the
development of innovative interoperable solutions for
public safety and protection, civil protection and
disaster relief.>>
Further activities RCEG
- Continuing working on frequencies + standardisation:
CEPT-FM-PT49, ETSI, TCCA-CCBG
New initiative: umbrella group worldwide for 3GPP work
- Mobile data applications
- EC Research program:
Where can we participate (FP7) + can we make our own
proposals (Horizon 2020)?
International cooperation
Tetra & Critical Communication Association (TCCA)
Subgroup CCBG:
Critical Communication Broadband Group
Broader scope: also Railways, utilities etc.
PPDR want to be part of global LTE Eco system
There are many TCCA-CCBG activities on LTE
Basic work done in CCBG
 Via CCBG input to 3GPP + ETSI
Some countries participate directly in 3GPP + ETSI
TCCA-CCBG
TCCA-CCBG activities on LTE, 3GPP etc.
See ‘landscape’
There is an “umbrella document” with all user requirements
+ system requirements
Based on all kind of existing URS’s
There is a discussion on architecture:
What in the LTE core + what in an “upper application layer”
APCO
3GPP LTE
NIST
Applications
WG
Marketing
Group
TCCA
OUA
Exact model of
cooperation
to be defined
Critical
Communication
Broadband Group
SFPG
Technical
Forum
NPST
C
Radio
Spectrum
ETSI TETRA
TC and WGs
PSCE
Asia Pacific
LEWP of JHA
Council
FM 49
DG INSFO
European
Union
RSCOM
Research
Bodies
WG FM
CEPT/ECC
Complex
landscape
23
TCCA + CCG
Standard-oriented bodies
Regulation
EU Bodies
US Bodies
Roadmap
There is a ‘global high level Roadmap’
made to give a reference
Presentation on behalf of the TETRA + Critical Communications Association
Timescales
Based on practical implementation of a harmonised European solution
Capacity
NOTES
• Tetra, Tetrapol, P25, GSM-R are already for years in use for
mission critical voice
• Tetra-1, Tetrapol, P25 and GSM-R have limited data functionalities
• TEDS is now possible and offers more data capacity
< - - - - - - - - TEDS - - - - - - - - - >
TETRA-1/Tetrapol/P25/GSM-R mission critical Data
TETRA/Tetrapol/P25/GSM-R mission critical Voice
2005
2012
< 2020
Presentation on behalf of the TETRA + Critical Communications Association
2025/30?
Timescales
Based on practical implementation of a harmonised European solution
Capacity
NOTES
• Tetra, Tetrapol, P25, GSM-R are already for years in use for
mission critical voice
• Tetra-1, Tetrapol, P25 and GSM-R have limited data functionalities
• TEDS is now possible and offers more data capacity
• Commercial networks can provide data functionalities now
• The coming period will be used for preparation of a European harmonised
dedicated Broadband solution: frequencies + technology/standard
• When this work is ready around 2020, dedicated networks can be realized
(without harmonisation and with frequencies available it can sooner)
< - - - - - - - - TEDS - - - - - - - - - >
TETRA-1/Tetrapol/P25/GSM-R mission critical Data
Next Generation Development
TETRA/Tetrapol/P25/GSM-R mission critical Voice
2005
2012
< 2020
Presentation on behalf of the TETRA + Critical Communications Association
2025/30?
Timescales
Capacity
Based on practical implementation of a harmonised European solution
NOTES
• Tetra, Tetrapol, P25, GSM-R are already for years in use for
mission critical voice
• Tetra-1 and GSM-R have limited data functionalities
• TEDS is now possible and offers more data capacity
• Commercial networks can provide data functionalities now
• The coming period will be used for preparation of a European harmonised
dedicated Broadband solution: frequencies + technology/standard
• When this work is ready around 2020, dedicated networks can be realized
(without harmonisation and with frequencies available it can sooner)
• Period after 2020 is unclear:
• Many existing networks will not be ready for replacement
• Voice services over LTE will be limited in early implementations
• Full TETRA functionality will take longer to replicate
• For many markets Tetra will still be used for voice anyhow
• Commercial networks will also still be used
(e.g. for non-mission critical) in a hybrid model
< - - - - - - - - TEDS - - - - - - - - - >
TETRA-1/Tetrapol/P25/GSM-R mission critical Data
Next Generation Development
TETRA/Tetrapol/P25/GSM-R mission critical Voice
2005
2012
< 2020
Presentation on behalf of the TETRA + Critical Communications Association
2025/30?
Does it make socio-economic sense?
• PPDR offers more socio-economic benefit than IMT
• WIK-Consult: “if improved disaster response could reduce property
losses by a mere three per cent (ignoring the value of any lives
saved), the cost benefit analysis proves out”
• LSE: estimates a consolidated annual socioeconomic value of £5
billion from the use of 2x10 MHz in the 700MHz band for public safety
in the UK and across EU28 countries, an annual value of
approximately €34 billion is computed.
• To auction or Not to Auction?
Using auctions to authorise spectrum for PPDR was rejected by
Marcus on the grounds that it would not allow interoperability across
European states and that the PPDR community is too fragmented to
place bids on it that reflected its true value.
Frequencies
CEPT-WGFM-PT49
• FM49: special working group for PPDR mobile broadband
• FM49 has a close relationship with LEWP
• LEWP Matrix is basis for frequency demand discussion
• ‘Report A / CEPT-199’ with LEWP Matrix + German study
as basis is ready. Result: minimum 2x10 MHz needed
• Now working on ‘Report B’: which frequency band(s)?
2 options: 400 + 700 MHz band
PPDR prefers 700 MHz band
Consider our needs
2 x 10 MHz – minimum for terrestrial network
- ‘Harmonised’ model
- At least in CEPT
- Globally in 700 MHz
- Allows flexible model: real use on National basis
- LTE combined with 700 MHz choice
- commercial technology
- roaming to commercial networks
WRC15 gives an unique opportunity for (worldwide)
PPDR Broadband solutions
Questions?
Thank you for your attention
[email protected]
+31-653164538