Transcript Slide 1

Sample Preparation and Perspective on
Proteomics
Dhileepkumar Jayaraman
Ané lab
Department of Agronomy
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Plant proteomics workshop
07/21/2014
Proteomics
“PROTEin complement
expressed by a genOME”
Identification all the proteins in
a cell or organism
Includes any PTMs, cellular
localization, functions, and
interactions
2/43
http://www.chem.purdue.edu/Tao
How complex is the proteome?
3/43
http://www.piercenet.com
Proteomic approaches
Experimental material
4/43
(Gosh &Xhu, 2014)
A decade of plant proteomics and mass
spectrometry
5/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.21365
Where we stand?
Articles
Reviews
Why?
6/43
(Pubmed data)
Plant cells are enclosed within a rigid
cell wall
Cellulose microfibrils, an electron
microscope view
Phospholipids of the plasma
membrane are amphipathic,
containing both a polar
(hydrophilic) head and a
nonpolar (hydrophobic) tail.
7/43
Sample preparation considerations
Compatible with subsequent steps
leading to protein identification by MS.
Extraction of proteins from a cell,
tissue or organelle should be as
complete as possible.
Maximum no. of proteins in minimum
no. of biochemical steps and minimum
time.
8/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Extraction Buffer Composition
Purposes of the Extraction Buffer
1. Dissolve cellular membranes
2. Inactivation of protease
3. Assist in the removal of contaminants
Class of additive example
concentration
purpose
Detergents
0.1-1%
Solubilization of poorly
soluble proteins
50-150mM
Maintain ionic strength of
medium
Stabilize lysosymal
membranes, reduce
protease release
Salts
Deoxycholate,
Triton X-100,
SDS
NaCl, KCl,
(NH4)2SO4
Glucose or sucrose
25 mM
Metal chelators
EDTA, EGTA
1 mM
Reducing agents
DTT, DTE
1-10 mM
2-Mercaptoethanol 0.05%
Reduce oxidation damage,
chelate metal ions
Reduce oxidation damage
9/43
www.embl.de
Detergents and inhibitors
Use of Detergents to Lyse Cells: Like Dissolves Like
Mixed micelle
Plasma membrane
(phospholipid bilayer)
Detergent molecules
+
SDS
Protease inhibitor
inhibition of
Aprotinin
serine proteases
Protease inhibitors function by
reversibly or irreversibly binding
to the protease.
Leupeptin
cysteine and serine proteases
PMSF
serine proteases
Pepstatin A
aspartic proteases
“Cocktail” is generally used
Phosphatase inhibitor
inhibition of
Sodium Fluoride
Ser/Thr and acidic phosphatase
Sodium Othovanadate
Tyr and alkaline phosphatase
Sodium Pyrophosphate
Ser/Thr phosphatase
10/43
www.embl.de
Grinding methods
Step 1: Disruption of cell walls by grinding
Step 1+2: mechanical disruption and
homogenization in extraction buffer
Grind sample into a fine powder to
shear cell walls and membranes
Step 2: Lysis of cells in extraction buffer
Mix thoroughly with extraction
buffer to dissolve cell membranes
and inhibit nuclease activity
11/43
A homogenizer allows cells to be
mechanically disrupted within the
extraction buffer
Crude lysate
Grinding methods considerations
Disruption of cell walls by grinding
Localized heating- leading to protein
denaturation and aggregation.
Pre-chill equipment and
samples on ice at all times.
Reproducibility.
Cells disrupt at different times.
12/43
keep
Grind sample into a fine powder to shear cell walls and
membranes
Plant organelle proteomics
13/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Organelle isolation
Characterization of proteomes in
different sub-cellular locations.
understanding of plant functions,
biosynthetic and signaling pathways.
 Sub-cellular fractionation Simplification of the proteome
14/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Organelle isolation.......
(i) disruption of the CW and
membrane (ii) fractionation of the
crude homogenate.
 Fractionation-physical differences
between organelles.
Differential centrifugationenriched fractions of the organelle.
 Purification by density gradient
centrifugation.
15/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Purity assessment of organelle
Microscopy – sensitive
and expensive
Biochemical -less
sensitive and cheap
16/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Organelle and structure specific
chemical dyes
(Hirayama etal.,2013, Nature)
17/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Organelle specific protein markers
18/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Proteomics of cell wall
Less abundant and physically embedded
in an insoluble polysaccharide matrix.
Lithium chloride and CaCl2.
Phosphotungstic acid (PTA) staining-free
from contamination, Vandate sensitive
H+ATPase activity.
Cytosolic contamination: Catalase as
marker enzyme.
19/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Proteomics of plasma membrane
PM-associated proteins display a
large diversity of physico-chemical
properties.
Salt treatments - integral membrane
proteins.
Alkaline treatments -lipid-anchored
PM proteins.
Organic solvents -hydrophobic
proteins.
20/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Proteomics of cytosol
Physically disrupt the plant cell wall but to
maintain organelle integrity.
Protoplasts isolation followed by
disruption of protoplasts.
 Differential centrifugation.
Purity testing- using markers for other
organelles.
Cytosolic markers cFBPase, TRXh3 and
UGPase.
21/43
(Ito et al., 2011, J. proteome Res)
Proteomics of nucleus
Optimal nuclear preparations consist of
homogenous membrane-bound forms with
intact nucleoli.
Contamination - DAPI staining.
The nuclear proteins -high salt buffers.
The enrichment for the nuclear-resident
proteins-histone as marker.
Further purity-antibodies directed against
marker proteins for other cell
compartments.
Phase‐contrast image
DAPI‐stained nuclear fraction
22/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Proteomics of mitochondria
The majority of mitochondrial proteins encoded by the
nucleus and synthesized as precursors in the cytosol before
being targeted to mitochondria.
Low abundance proteins identification is a challenge but
they play a very important role.
Mitotracker.
23/43
(Plant proteomics, Mtds&Protocols, 2014)
Purification of protein complexes
Most proteins exist as complexes.
These macromolecular complexes
should be purified with out losing
their confirmations.
Co-immunopurification.
Affinity tag purification.
24/43
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20301
Our proteomics projects, past &
present………
25/43
Plant-microbe mutualisms
Arbuscular
mycorrhization
Symbiotic
mutualisms
Legume
nodulation
26/43
•
•
•
•
•
Fungi: Glomeromycota
More than 80% of higher plants
Very ancient symbiosis (460 MYA)
No organogenesis
Phosphorous, potassium and
nitrogen
• Protection against pathogens
• Low level of host specificity
•
•
•
•
•
•
Rhizobia: gram negative bacteria
Restricted to legumes
More recent symbiosis (60 MYA)
Nodule organogenesis
Nitrogen fixation
Highly specific
Legume nodulation
Medicago truncatula-Sinorhizobium meliloti model
Legume root nodules
27/43
Mutual recognition of chemical signals
Genetic analyses of symbiotic signaling
28/43
Rose*, Venkateshwaran* et al., 2012 MCP
Isobaric tags for relative and absolute
quantification (iTRAQ)
29/43
Ross, Huang, Pappin, et al. MCP 2004
Quantitative phosphoproteomics workflow
30/43
Unique peptides
63290
Unique phosphopeptides
15335
Localized phosphosites
13506
Proteins
7739
Phosphoproteins
3926
Applications of large scale approaches
1. Phosphoproteomics time course experiments
2. Phosphoproteomics combined with genetics
3. Medicago, proteomic, phosphoproteomic and acetylomic atlas
31/43
Global analysis of the time Course
experiments
32/43
Global analysis of the time Course
experiments
33/43
Rose*, Venkateshwaran* et al., 2012 MCP
Tracking individual phosphorylation
events
Dynamin-related protein 2B
(DRP2B)
34/43
Tracking individual phosphorylation
events
Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM)
Genetics
35/43
Applications of large scale approaches
1. Phosphoproteomics time course experiments
2. Phosphoproteomics combined with genetics
3. Medicago, proteomic, phosphoproteomic and acetylomic atlas
36/43
Genetic analyses of symbiotic signaling
37/43
Rose*, Venkateshwaran* et al., 2012 MCP
Global Changes in Mutants
Global Phosphoisoform Changes
Global Transcript Changes
38/43
Cross-talk between different symbiotic signaling
pathways in Medicago
39/43
Rose*, Venkateshwaran* et al., 2012 MCP
Applications of large scale approaches
1. Phosphoproteomics time course experiments
2. Phosphoproteomics combined with genetics
3. Medicago, proteomic, phosphoproteomic and acetylomic atlas
40/43
Medicago, proteomic,
phosphoproteomic, acetylomic atlas
Leaves
Seeds
Stems
Flowers
10, 14 &28 dpi nodules
Roots
41/43
http://more.biotech.wisc.edu/
42/43
Rose*, Venkateshwaran* et al., 2012 MCP
Thank you
43/43