Transcript 슬라이드 1

Development Plan for Green Port
President CEO YB, Choi
Hanjin New Port Co.
한진해운 신항만㈜
대표이사 최 영 배
Nov. 12th, 2009
Contents
1. Environmental issues and Global
warming
2. International concern and Trends
3. Domestic Situation and Response
4. Environmental issues in Logistics
5. Green
port status and Action plan for
domestic ports
6. HJNC’s action plan for Green port
7. Conclusion
1
Environmental issues and Global warming
Global warming
The world’s average temperature rise and the rapid melting of polar glaciers
The reduction rate of polar glaciers per year
3
1 Environmental issues and Global warming
Environmental
crisis clock
2008 current time 09:33
12:00
Impossible for
humans to live
9:01~12:00
Very anxious
6:01~9:00
Quite anxious
00:01~3:00
Not anxious
3:01~6:00
A little anxious
4
2 International concern and Trends
Agreements
1992
1997
2001
2005
The history of conventions on climate change between countries
UNCED in Rio
United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC)
Adoption of the Kyoto
Protocol
EU and 37 developed countries discuss
reducing greenhouse gas emissions
Arrange specific implementation plans of the
Kyoto Protocol
Adoption of Marrakesh
agreement
Arrange 1st commitment period of
greenhouse gas reduction (2008~2012)
The Kyoto Protocol
entered into force
2007
Bali Roadmap
2009
Copenhagen Conference
Raised the need to reduce greenhouse gas
in developed countries
Discuss new post-Kyoto Protocol (2013~)
5
2 International concern and Trends
The schedule after
Effectuation of the Kyoto Protocol
2005
2008
Effectuation of the Kyoto Protocol
Negotiating reduction for
the 2nd performance period:
South Korea under pressure
to reduce greenhouse
Gas emissions.
2013
2018
1st
Performance period
2nd
Performance period
Developed countries
reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
South Korea inevitably
participates.
6
2 International concern and Trends
Obama, President of U.S.
1
• 80% reduction in greenhouse gas(CO2) emissions by 2050
2
• Approving the global warming treaty
3
• Investing in alternative energy
4
• creating 5 million ‘green jobs’
World-wide environmental declaration
1
• In Journalism: Rupert Murdoch
2
• In Shipping: MAERSK, Evergreen, MOL
3
• In Industry: GE의 Ecomagination (Toyota, BP)
4
• In distributing: Wal-Mart, Tesco
7
3 Domestic situation and Response
Domestic Reality
Energy consumption and
Pollutant emissions in South Korea
• Increase greenhouse gas emissions continuously
• The average annual growth rate of 7.9% in greenhouse gas from 1990 to 1997, higher than
the growth rate of 7.1% in GDP
• Continuously increase proportion of energy-guzzling industries (steel, petrochemical industry)
since 1990
• Rapidly increase greenhouse gas emissions per capita from 1.9TC/Capita in 1990 to 3.1TC/Capita
in 1997
(World lanking)
Greenhouse gas emissions (2005)
16th(OECD 6th)
Greenhouse gas emissions per capita (2005)
28th
CO2 emissions (2006)
9th
Growth rate of CO2 emissions (2006)
OECD 1st
If obligations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are charged hereafter,
Korean economic growth could shrink concerning the difficulty of its
Reduction in Korean circumstances.
8
3 Domestic situation and Response
Domestic reality and Respond
Korean President’s “Green growth” Declaration :
Selected as a national challenge Aug 5th, 2008
Forming eco-friendly business &
Developing new industries
energy-saving infrastructure
to respond to climate change
Improving independent energy &
Developing renewable energy &
Creating green Korean Peninsula
clean energy
Included in parties to UNFCCC
from 2013
Research actual emissions of greenhouse gas in logistics and accept
plans and road map to attain target for greenhouse gas reduction.
9
4
Environmental issues in Logistics
Trends in domestic private companies
Hanjin Shipping
1
• Operate fuel-saving service lanes (BSP : Bunker Saving Program)
2
• Streamlined routes, Vessel speed reduction
3
• Install new shipbuilding AMP (Alternative Maritime Power)
POSCO
1
• Steadily expand volume of eco-friendly marine & rail transportation
2
• Secure competitiveness through diversification of transportation
3
• Reduce distribution costs by road damage & mass transportation
Domestic companies haven’t recognized environmental issues yet.
Government’s measure also isn’t specific.
10
4
Environmental issues in Logistics
CO2 emission Ratio by industry
Source : International Energy Agency
11
4
Environmental issues in Logistics
Energy Consumption by Transportation mode
Source : Development plan for Modal Shift to establish eco friendly logistics system KMI(2008)
■ To reduce Co2 emission, Developed countries are trying to reduce the utilization of truck and tend to increase
utilization of Ship or Rail transportation which is more eco friendly transportation
■ utilization of road transportation increases gradually. But, usage of transportation via sea and rail tends to decrease
12
4
Environmental issues in Logistics
Environmental issues in Logistics
Global
Warming
Ozone Depletion
It caused by CO2 from vehicles and Vessels
Causing from Air conditioner of Vehicle, Reefer Container,
refrigeration/freezer Tank
Acid Rain
It caused by Sox, Nox from Vehicles and Vessels
Marine
Pollution
Oil Spills by Marine Accident
Destruction of
Rainforest
Exhaustion of
resources
Using packing material for transit & Pallet
Exhaustion of petroleum resources
13
4
Environmental issues in Logistics
Countermeasures from many countries
Transferring to Rail
and Ship
Automation Equipment
(Mass Transportation)
System introduction
Modal
Shift
Introduction of
advanced
logistics
management
techniques
Subsidy and tax
benefits to applicable
company
WMS, Cross Docking
Subsidy &
Incentive
In case of switching
to eco-friendly
Transportation
Eco-friendly
vehicles,
Electronic
Vehicle
Green logistics
certification
system
E-RTGC
reusable packaging
container & Pallet
14
5
Green port status and Action plan
Eco Friendly Port Technology
Eco Friendly Port Operation Technology
In Charge
In short term
Liner
• Fuel Change
• Catalyst
• Controller
for fuel usage
• Automated berth
system
In long term
• AMP
• Clean Vessel
• C/C unit increase
• C/C ability ↑
• new C/C development
Terminal
• Non peak incentive
• Multi spreader
• Relocation
Operator
•24 hour operation
• advanced
• proper facility size
equipment
• Non stop at gate
• gate separation
Trucking/
Shipper
• Modal Shift
• Fuel Change
• Multi vehicle
Eco Friendly Green Terminal
• Vessel Speed ↓
In mid term
•Clean vehicle input
15
5
Green port status and Action plan
Eco Friendly Port Technology
Equipment
change
• Required a gradual replacement due to costing a lot of money
E-RTGC
existing RTGC
Terminal
Huchison
KBCT
Gamman
New
Gamman
U-am
TTL
T/C
33
37
41
16
13
140
Cost
12,012
13,468
14,924
5,842
4,732
50,960
(million won)
Source : Haesa economy paper(2009.02.06), http://www.ihaesa.com/News/list_view.html?Pass=IB-5-23065
■ Replacement cost of 1T/C with E-RTGC is 364 million won. Total replacement cost of RTGC in existing North port is
50,960 million won.
16
5
Green port status and Action plan
Eco Friendly Port Technology
• Exhaust Gas emission reduction by installing AMP
(Alternative Maritime Power)
Equipment adopt
(AMP)
• Nox 1 Ton decrease
Expected
result
AMP install
• Sox 0.5 Ton decrease
Terminal
Huchison
KBCT
Gamma
n
New
Gamman
U-am
PNC
HJNC
TTL
Berth
2
2
2
1
1
4
2
14
Install Cost
Mil won
5
5
5
2.5
2.5
10
5
35
Source : Hae Sa newspaper (2009.02.06), http://www.ihaesa.com/News/list_view.html?Pass=IB-5-23065
■ Install Cost is 2.5 billion won per berth. Estimated cost for installing 50% berth in Busan is about 35 billion won
17
5
Green port status and Action plan
Eco Friendly Port Technology
Green
House Gas
by mode
Most eco friendly mode is transportation via Sea and next is via Rail
(Unit : g/ton-km)
Gas
Trucking
Via Rail
Via Sea
CO
0.5
0.2
0.04
CO₂
98
28
15
HC
0.2
0.1
0.01
NOx
1
0.5
0.3
SO₂
0.03
0.04
0.3
Source : Development plan for Modal Shift to establish eco friendly logistics system KMI(2008)
■ Rank for Co2 gas emission: trucking (98g/ton-km) – via rail (28g/ton-km) – via Sea (15g/ton-km)
■ Most eco friendly transportation mode is marine transportation
18
5
Green port status and Action plan
Eco Friendly Port Technology
Social
Indirect Cost
Marine transportation is the most competitive in terms of social indirect cost
including pollution and noise and etc.
(Unit : won/ton-km)
Cost
Land Trucking
Via Rail
Via Sea
Air pollution
82
12.2
8.1
Noise
13
2.3
0
Accident
135.9
6.9
0.8
Congestion
18
0
0
Maintenance
5.6
22.3
0
Total
254.5
43.7
8.9
Source : Development plan for Modal Shift to establish eco friendly logistics system KMI(2008)
19
5
Green port status and Action plan
Eco Friendly Port Technology
Rear
Transportation
Tucking takes up 90% of the rear transportation of the port
Need for various transportation mode
Joint Delivery required
Existing Hardware available
No need for additional investment
Requiring Gov, Subsidy or incentives
for stable service
20
6
HJNC Action Plan for Green Port
Ship Shuttle
Modal Shift
For better T/S connection between North and New Port, Modal Shift started with BPA
incentives from trucking to Ship Shuttle Service
North Port
BICT/OTHERS
New Port
HJNC/PNC
21
6
HJNC Action Plan for Green Port
Ship Shuttle
Volume
Handling over 5,000 TEU per month except for starting month
■ Total 15,757 TEU of T/S containers were handled via Ship Shuttle from trucking
since the start of operation during last 3 month
22
6
HJNC Action Plan for Green Port
Ship Shuttle
Social Indirect
Cost Saving
Month
Social indirect cost reduction is about 1.9 billion won by transferring to
Ship Shuttle
Vol. (TEU)
R/T
Trucking (Won)
Ship Shuttle
(Won)
Reduction (Won)
Jul
3,895
77,900
495,638,750
16,943,250
478,695,500
Aug
6,318
126,360
803,965,500
27,483,300
776,482,200
Sep
5,544
110,880
705,474,000
24,116,400
681,357,600
Oct
5,900
118,000
750,775,000
25,665,000
725,110,000
Total
15,757
315,140
2,005,078,250
68,542,950
1,936,535,300
Source: Considered Air pollution, Noise, Accident, Congestions, M&R Cost (referring to Page 19)
23
6
HJNC Action Plan for Green Port
Ship Shuttle
Exhaust (gas)
Emission
Reduction
Co2 emission reduced by 187,933Ton via Ship Shuttle for the last 3
months starting from July 2009
(Unit : ton)
Gas
Trucking
Ship Shuttle
Reduction volume
CO
973
78
895
CO2
190,855
2,921
187,934
HC
389
19
370,025
Nox
1,947
584
1,363
SO2
58
584
-525
■ Co2 emission cost is 14.40Euro/Ton(as of 09.11.04) and its total reduced amount
reached 4.7 billion won
24
6
HJNC Action Plan for Green Port
Expected effect from Ship Shuttle
• More options from various transportation mode
Modal Shift
• Risk management in case of strike or emergency
• Service quality increase by competition
• Strengthening T/S connection between New & North port
Strengthening
Connection
• New liner or T/S volume increase thru Co-opetition with North port
(New port – North
port)
• Primary example of synergy created by cooperation with North port
• Compared to trucking, 40,000 won / move reduction with BPA
Cost
Saving
incentive
• Social indirect cost reduction monthly 500 Mil won
• Co2 emission cost reduction monthly 1.2 Billion won
25
[
6
HJNC Action Plan for Green Port
Coastal service
Modal Shift
• Securing various transit mode between Pohang & Busan from trucking of steel cargos
• Indirect cost resulted from heavy & over-freight cargos
[ Transportation via Land / Sea]
Po hang
Busan
26
6
HJNC Action Plan for Green Port
Coastal Transportation
Item
Coastal service (122 km)
Inland trucking (190 km)
Capacity
500 TEU class / 2day
(Open for Daily SVC according to volume)
When needed
Biz
Scope
Trucking – Storage - Sea Transportation - Stevedoring at
New Port
Trucking - Stevedoring
Advantage
Mass transportation
Shipper incentives
Long stay cargos
Hot Delivery
Transit
Time
6 and half hour (13 knot)
3 to 4 hour
Target
Volume
• Targeting monthly 6,400 TEU from new port to Pohang
• Targeting monthly 1,610 TEU from Pohang to New Port
(Unit : TEU)
TEU
From New port
To new port
Total
Pohang
6,400
1,610
8,010
27
6
HJNC Action Plan for Green Port
Indirect cost
reduction
Indirect cost savings are monthly 7.5 billion won via sea transportation
Vol. (TEU)
8,010
R/T
Land Trucking
(Won)
160,200
7,746,471,000
Coastal Service
(Won)
170,036,280
Cost reduction (Won)
7,576,434,720
Source: Considered air pollution, Noise, accident, Congestions, M&R Cost (referring to Page 19)
Exhaust gas
Emission
Decrease
Co2 emission was decreased by 2.7 million ton via sea transportation
(Unit : Ton)
Emission
Via Land
Via Sea
Cost Savings
CO
14,418
782
13,636
CO2
2,825,928
29,317
2,796,611
HC
5,767
195
5,572
Nox
28,836
5,863
22,973
SO2
865
5,863
-4,998
■ Co2 emission cost is 14.4 Euro/ton (As of 09.11.04) and, the amount reached 7.4
billion won
28
6
HJNC Action Plan for Green Port
Expected effect by coastal SVC
• Chronic
수/출입 over
화물의
freight
대부분이
problem
철강관련
(Steel, 아이템으로
Metals)
만성적인 과적 문제
Modal Shift
• Various
내륙 운송
mode
중심에서
available
다양한
instead
모드of선택
inland
가능
trucking
• Securing
육상운송 competitive
경쟁을 통한price
서비스
& qualified
질 향상과
service
합리적인
by competition
가격
• Terminal volume increase by coastal service
Strengthening
Connection
(Pohang – Busan)
Cost
Saving
• Activation of two port via cooperation with Po-hang
• Synergy from cooperation between Po-hang & Busan
• Social indirect Cost reduction Monthly 7.5 Billion won
• 74 billion won reduction by Co2 emission decrease
29
7
Conclusion
Key factors
For Success
1. Government Subsidy required for high cost & eco-friendly
modal shift
2. Perception Change (Shipper/ Trucker)
3. Founding Committee related to Carbon tax, Tradable
pollution permits
4. Transportation mode development with less emission
5. Incentives from int’l organizations by Green Port Certificate
30
Thank You
Your Choice Your success