8. Place Value Division

Download Report

Transcript 8. Place Value Division

Taking the Fear
out of Math
next
#5
Unultiplying
Whole Numbers
Division
81 ÷ 9
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
Formulas as a Way to “Unite”
Multiplication and Division
A rather easy way to see the relationship
between multiplication and division is in
terms of simple formulas.
For example, we all know that there are 12
inches in a foot. Thus, to convert the
number of feet to the number of inches, we
simply multiply the number of feet by 12.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
As a specific example, to convert 5 feet
into an equivalent number of inches, we
first notice that 5 feet may be viewed as
5 × 1 foot and we may then replace 1 foot
by 12 inches to obtain that
5 feet = 5 × 12 inches or 60 inches.
In terms of a more
verbal description,
the “recipe” (which
we usually refer to
as a formula) may be
stated as follows…
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
Step 1: Start with the
number of feet.
Step 2: Multiply by 12.
Step 3: Finally,
replace feet by the
number of inches.
next
The verbal description above is easy
to understand but cumbersome to write
(and it gets even more cumbersome as the
“recipe” contains more and more steps).
The algebraic shortcut is to let a
“suggestive” letter of the alphabet
represent the number of feet (perhaps
the letter “F” because it suggests feet,
and similarly let a letter such as I to
represent the number of inches
(because it suggests inches).
Use the equal sign to represent the word
“is”.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
The verbal recipe and algebraic formula
are shown below…
English - “Recipe”
Step 1: Start with a
quantity, the number
of feet.
Step 2: Multiply by 12
Step 3: Replace feet
by inches and the
product is I.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
Algebra
F
F × 12 (or 12 ×
F)
F × 12 = I
next
Algebra Notes
Because × and x are easy to confuse
(especially when we’re writing by hand), we
do not use the “times sign” in algebra.
Rather than write 12 × F we would write 12F
(even if it were in the form F × 12, we would
write 12F probably because of how natural it
is to say such things as “I have 12 dollars”
as opposed to “I have dollars 12”).
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
Algebra Notes
It is also traditional to write the letter
that stands by itself (namely, the
“answer”) to the left of the equal sign
but this is not really vital. In any case
when we write I = 12F it is
“shorthand” for the verbal situation
described in Steps 1, 2, and 3.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
In studying algebra, many students are
stymied by the symbolism. For whatever
reason, there seems to be an anxiety among
many beginning students when letters are
used to represent numbers. Therefore, it is
a nice transition (and it also highlights an
aspect of learning a language) to have
students learn to translate “English” into
“Algebra” and also from “Algebra” into
English. Skill in being able to maneuver
easily between “English” and “Algebra” can
go a long way in helping a student better
understand algebra.
next
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
In any case, the verbal process gives us
an easy way to see the relationship between
multiplication and division. Namely, when
we started with 5 feet, we multiplied 5 by 12
to get the number of inches.
On the other hand, if we started with
60 inches and wanted to know the number
of feet with which we started, we would
have to realize that we obtained 60 inches
after we multiplied by 12.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
We obtained 60 inches from 5 feet after we
multiplied by 12. To determine the number
of feet we started with, we must unmultiply
by 12. Unmultiplying is actually division,
so 5 feet = 60 inches ÷ 12.
In more familiar terms, to convert
60 inches into feet, we divide 60 by 12.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
The Division Algorithm for
Whole Numbers
Again, we assume that the students
know the standard algorithm for
performing long division.
What is not always clear to students is
that division is really a form of rapid
subtraction.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
Let’s look at a typical kind of problem
that one uses to illustrate a division problem.
For example, consider the following
question…
A certain book company ships
its books in cartons, each of
which contains 13 books. If a
customer makes an order for
2,821 books, how many cartons
will it take to ship the books?
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
To answer this question we divide 2,821
by 13 to obtain 217 as the quotient.
The usual algorithm is illustrated below.
13
© Math As A Second Language
217
2,821
2 6
22
13
91
91
All Rights Reserved
next
However, even if it is successfully
memorized by students, this algorithm is
rarely understood by them. However, with a
little help from our “adjective/noun” theme
the “mysticism” is quickly evaporated!
The “fill in the blank” problem we are being
asked to solve is…
13 × ___ = 2,821
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
13 × ___ = 2,821
Since 13 × 2 = 26, our adjective/noun
theme tells us that 13 × 200 = 2,6001
Hence, after we have packed 200 cartons,
we have packed 2,600 books.
note
1
Since we also know that 13 × 300 = 3,900, we know that there aren't enough books
left to fill an additional hundred cartons. In other words, at this stage we know
that we need more than 200 cartons but less than 300 cartons in order to pack
the books.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
Since we started with 2,821 books,
there are now 221 (that is, 2,821 – 2,600)
books still left to pack.
Since 13 × 1 = 13, we know that 13 × 10 =
130.
Hence, after we pack an additional
10 cartons there are still 91
(that is, 221 – 130) books still left to pack).
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
Finally, since 13 × 7 = 91, we see that it
takes 7 more cartons to pack the
remaining books.
Thus, in all, we had to use 217
(that is, 200 + 10 + 7) cartons.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
We can now write the above result in
tabulated form as shown below.
2 , 8 2 1 books
– 2 6 0 0 books
2 2 1 books left
– 1 3 0 books
9 1 books left
– 9 1 books
0 books left
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
2 0 0 cartons filled
1 0 more cartons
7 more cartons
217 cartons filled
next
The previous format is less familiar
than the traditional algorithm, but it
seems to better exhibit the “rapid,
repeated subtraction” principle.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
However, if we simply
insert the “missing”
digits” into the
13
traditional algorithm
(they are emphasized
in red type), we see
that the numbers in the
emended version look
exactly the same as the
numbers in the
previous format.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
7 cartons
1 0 cartons
2 0 0 cartons
2 , 8 2 1 books
2 6 0 0 books
2 2 1 books
1 3 0 books
9 1 books
9 1 books
0 books
next
Notes
In checking a division problem,
we multiply the quotient by the
divisor, and if we divided
correctly, the product we
obtain should be equal to the
dividend. In terms of the
present illustration, the usual
check is to show that
217 × 13 = 2,821, and we
usually perform the check as
shown.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
217
× 13
651
2170
2821
next
Notes
The rows in the above multiplication
(namely, 651 and 2170) have no relationship
to the three rows in the division shown in
the above computation (2600, 130 and 91).
The reason is that the division problem
showed us that if there were 13 books in
each carton, then 217 cartons would have to
be used. On the other hand, the check by
multiplication showed that if there were 217
books in a carton, then 13 cartons would
have to be used.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
Notes
However, a more
enlightening way to
perform the check is to
compute the product in the
less traditional but more
accurate form 217 × 13.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
13
× 217
91
130
2600
2821
Indeed, when we do the problem this
way we see an “amazing” connection
between multiplication and division.
217
13
13
2,821
× 217
2 600
91
221
130
130
2600
2
91
2821
note
91
next
2
We put in the 0’s for emphasis. That is, because the 6 in 26 was placed directly under
the 8, and since the 8 was already holding the hundreds place, we did not need the
two 0’s as place holders. We are not advocating that the above format replace the
usual long division algorithm, but rather that by using the above format a “few”
times, the usual algorithm will seem more natural (or logical) to use.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
Notice that when written in this form
we see that the same three numbers we
add to get the product (namely 91, 130
and 2,600 are the same three numbers
(in the reverse order) we subtract to find
the quotient.
This illustrates quite vividly the
connection between division and
multiplication as inverse processes.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
Closing Notes on the
Adjective/Noun Theme
Students often tend to be careless when it
comes to keeping track of
place holders when doing division.
For example, given a
problem such as
2,613 ÷ 13 they will
often write.
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
13
21
2,613
2 6
13
13
next
With a little number sense they should
see that this answer is not even
plausible because 13 ×100 is only 1,300
and 13 × 21 is less than 13 × 100.
Hence 13 × 21 is much too small to be
equal to 2,613.
13
© Math As A Second Language
21
2,613
2 6
13
13
All Rights Reserved
next
However, using our adjective/noun
theme, we see that…
13
1
20 0
2,613
2 600
13
13
200 thirteen’s
1 thirteen
201 thirteen’s
© Math As A Second Language
All Rights Reserved
next
division
© Math As A Second Language
63 ÷ 9
All Rights Reserved
In our next
presentation, we
introduce the concept
of factors and
multiples.