Transcript N d - ANTS

A Cross-Layer Scheduling Algorithm
With QoS Support in Wireless Networks
Qingwen Liu, Student Member, IEEE, Xin Wang, Member, IEEE,
and Georgios B. Giannakis, Fellow, IEEE
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 55, NO. 3, MAY 2006
報告者:李宗穎
1
Outline
•
•
•
•
•
Introduction
System Architecture
Scheduler Design
Simulation
Conclusion
2
Introduction
• 802.11, 802.16, and 802.15 networks support
multimedia services with different QoS
requirement
• channel capacity in wireless networks is time
varying due to multipath fading
• Paper define a priority function (PRF) depend
on the 1) wireless channel quality, 2) QoS
satisfaction, and 3) service priority across
layers
3
Network Configuration
• Star topology is also used to describe the
connections between each relay station and
multiple SS in mobile ad hoc networks and
wireless sensor networks
4
Wireless link from BS to SS
• A buffer is implemented at the BS for each
connection and operates in a FIFO mode
• The AMC (Adaptive Modulation and Coding)
controller follows the buffer at the BS
5
• AMC selector is implemented at the SS
Transmission modes in the IEEE 802.16 Standard
• At the MAC, each packet is mapped to a symbol
block containing Nb/Rn symbols
• At the PHY, each frame is divided into Nc + Nd
time slots
6
Processing units at MAC and PHY
7
QoS Architecture at the MAC
• Unsolicited grant service (UGS)
EX: VoIP…
• Real-time polling service (rtPS)
EX: MPEG video and video stream…
• Nonreal-time polling service (nrtPS)
EX: FTP…
• Best effort (BE)
EX: HTTP、Email…
8
AMC Design at the PHY
• To simplify the AMC design, paper approximate the
PER expression in AWGN channels
• AMC design guarantees that the PER (Packet Error
Rate) is less than or equal to P0
9
Scheduling UGS Connections
• The AMC design is not adopted for UGS
Nr = Nd – NUGS
Nr:availability time slot
Nd:all time slot to transmit data
NUGS:UGS connections time slot
10
Scheduling rtPS Connections
• Fi(t) is the delay satisfaction indicator
Fi(t) = Ti − ΔTi −Wi(t) + 1
Ti = maximum latency
ΔTi = guard time region
Wi(t) = longest packet waiting time
• ψi(t) is the PRF for connection i at time t
11
Scheduling nrtPS Connections
• Fi(t) is the rate satisfaction indicator
ηi(t) = average rate at time t
ηi = minimum reserved rate
• ψi(t) is the PRF for connection i at time t
12
Scheduling BE Connections
• ψi(t) is the PRF for connection i at time t
• The priority of QoS classes is rtPS > nrtPS > BE
βrtPS > βnrtPS > βBE
13
Desirable Features
• Efficient bandwidth utilization
• Delay bound Ti is provided for rtPS
connections
• Throughput is guaranteed for nrtPS
connections
• Implementation complexity is low
• Flexibility is provided
• Scalability is achieved
14
Simulation Parameter Setting
The frame length is Tf = 1ms
Packet length at the MAC is fixed to Nb = 128bytes
Simulation time = 60000ms
MAX delay MIN Thoughput
PER
SNR
β
rtPS-1
30ms
2Mbps
0.01
15dB
1.0
rtPS-2
50ms
1Mbps
0.01
20dB
1.0
nrtPS-1
-
6Mbps
0.001 15dB
0.8
nrtPS-2
-
3Mbps
0.001 20dB
0.8
BE-1
-
-
0.001 16dB
0.6
BE-2
-
-
0.001 18dB
0.6
15
Result Nr=3
rtPS
nrtPS
BE
16
Result Nr=2
rtPS
nrtPS
BE
17
Result Nr=1
rtPS
nrtPS
BE
18
Conclusions
• Paper developed a cross-layer scheduling
algorithm at the MAC layer for multiple
connections with diverse QoS requirements
• Future works, scheduling multiple connections
each time may lead to better performance
19