Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Contractors

Download Report

Transcript Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Contractors

DOE Consolidated Audit Program
Don Dihel,CHMM
Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office
2015 Paducah Site Status Report
September 15, 2014
ASP 2015 Workshop
Site Background
•
•
•
•
3,556 acres total
> 500 structures / facilities
4 main process buildings
1,760 process components
•
•
•
•
Groundwater source contamination
Soils remediation
Future D&D
Pump-and-Treat optimization
www.energy.gov/EM
2
• Paducah enrichment and support facilities were leased to USEC
Inc. in 1994.
• In April 2014, USEC stopped enrichment operations.
• In August 2014, USEC formally submitted a letter to PPPO
announcing its intention to return its leased facilities, including
PAL, back to DOE.
www.energy.gov/EM
3
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant
Contractors
• Swift and Staley Team
• Teaming partners of Swift and Staley Mechanical,
Wastren Advantage, Incorporated, and Northwind.
• Responsible for Facility Support Services at the Paducah
Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Paducah, Kentucky.
• Contract ended March 2015, but extended.
• Won contract for 3rd time. Awaiting Notice To Proceed
to start 60 day transition to new contract.
www.energy.gov/EM
4
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant
Contractors
• Flour Federal Services (FFS)
• Teaming partners of Fluor, Los Alamos Technical
Associates, and Chicago Bridge & Iron.
• FFS is responsible for the management, integration and
execution of the deactivation and post-GDP shutdown
remediation activities at the Paducah site.
• FFS is assumed responsibilities for enrichment and
support facilities in October, 2014.
• FFS supports DOECAP.
www.energy.gov/EM
5
Project Scope
PERIOD 1
Task Order
Implementation Period


PERIOD 2
Deactivation Project
Timeline
De-Lease Planning &
Transfer Period
PERIOD 3
Future D&D
Facility Deactivation & Infrastructure Optimization Period
PERIOD 4
Post-GDP Shutdown Environmental Remediation Services Period
NTP
July 2014
Transfer of
GDP
October 2014
End of Current
Remediation Contract
End of Task Order
July 2015
July 2017
www.energy.gov/EM
6
Accomplishments
Deactivation and Environmental Remediation
• Drained, packaged, and shipped lube oil from process buildings some
of which will be reused as a cleaning agent.
• Began removal of R-114 refrigerant from the gaseous diffusion plant
for safer deposit removal activities.
• Two of the ten systems that will remove uranium deposits from the
gaseous diffusion plant, the first of their kind, are on site.
• Completed switchyard consolidation to better suit the changing needs
of the plant site.
• Identified 11 facilities for D&D to support footprint reduction.
• Deep soil mixing to remove TCE contamination from soil is more than
50% complete.
www.energy.gov/EM
7
C-410/420 Demolition
• Demolition of the 116,000-square-foot C-410/420 Feed Plant was
completed on May 14, 2015.
• 2,600 panels of cement asbestos siding and 9,000 feet of pipe are among
the more 4,700 tons of waste safely removed prior to demolition.
www.energy.gov/EM
8
C-410/420 Demolition
Constructed in 1956 the
C-410/420 Feed Plant was used
to produce uranium hexafluoride
(UF6) for uranium enrichment in
the plants cascades.
• The 85-foot tall Feed Plant
began demolition in 2011
with the ~30,000-square-foot
Eastern-Third. Crews had to
remove system piping and
other equipment prior to the
final stages of demolition in
2014.
www.energy.gov/EM
9
C-410/420 Demolition
• Wastes were loaded into 114 rail-cars and shipped to Clive, UT, including
over 110,000-square-feet of building material.
• The amount of waste generated from decontamination and demolition
would cover one football field 15 feet deep.
www.energy.gov/EM
10
C-410/420 Demolition
2006
2015
www.energy.gov/EM
11
Fissile Deinventory
• Developed program to handle
fissile material as part of the
fissile deinventory project.
• Over 100 people were trained
to safely remove fissile
material in facilities that have
ceased operations.
• Almost 230 pieces of fissile
waste from the C-720
Maintenance and Stores
building have been removed.
162 total containers of waste
have been generated.
www.energy.gov/EM
12
Waste Management
FY15 Waste Management
• Dispositioned more than 160,000
gallons of lube oil from the
process buildings
• Dispositioned more than 25,000
gallons of PCB transformer oil
from Building C-337
• Developed four authorization
limit packages for offsite
treatment/disposition of lube oil
and PCB transformer oil; and
• Performed a paper and site Audit
of the Veolia Incinerator Facility in
Port Arthur, Texas.
www.energy.gov/EM
13
FY 2016 Planned Work
• Continue Uranium Deposit Removal
• Continue Deactivation:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Refrigerant
Lube Oil
Utility Optimization
Small, unused facility D&D
Pump-and-Treat Operations
Southwest and Northeast Plumes
Regulatory documentation of the On-site Waste Disposal Option
Waste Management and Removal from several facilities and areas
www.energy.gov/EM
14
Waste Generation
Containers
Volume (ft3)
Volume (m3)
Weight (lbs)
Weight (tons)
Waste Generated
485
59,617
1,688
1,967,549
984
Waste Shipped Offsite
80
38,003
1,076
1,536,105
768
Waste Disposed in C-746-U
19
10,260
291
142,819
71
• The lube oil removal project has shipped almost 200 tons of waste
offsite in tanker trucks.
• An additional 160 tons of PCB oil from PCB transformers have been
remove and shipped offsite in containers.
• Removal of theses wastes are crucial to moving forward with future
D&D activities.
www.energy.gov/EM
15
TSDs used by Paducah
•
•
•
•
•
•
Diversified Scientific Services, Inc., Kingston, TN
Energy Solutions, Clive, UT
Materials and Energy Corporation, Oak Ridge, TN
Clean Harbors Eldorado, Eldorado, AR
Clean Harbors Deer Park, Deer Park, TX
Waste Control Specialists, Andrews, TX
www.energy.gov/EM
16
Paducah Support for DOECAP
•
During FY 2015, the Paducah site provided support
for the following TSD audits:
o Don Dihel – EnergySolutions, Bear Creek, TN
Waste Control Specialists, Andrews, TX
o During FY 2016, the Paducah site anticipates
supporting the following TSD audits:
o Don Dihel – EnergySolutions, Bear Creek, TN
Waste Control Specialists, Andrews, TX
o Lisa Turner – two audits - TBD
17
www.energy.gov/EM
17
Analytical Outlook
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017
Total
740
4,500
3,300
8,540
Environmental Remediation Samples*
5,200
5,200
5,400
15,800
Total
5,940
9,700
8,700
24,340
Operational Samples
* Environmental Remediation Samples will continue to be shipped offsite for analysis.
www.energy.gov/EM
18
Approved Labortories
• ALS Laboratory Group Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
• GEL, LLC, Charleston, SC
• Materials and Chemistry Laboratory, Inc., Oak Ridge,
TN
• Microbac Tennessee, Johnson City, TN
• ALS Environmental Laboratory, Ft. Collins, CO
• TestAmerica St. Louis, Earth City, MO
• Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX
• Shealy Environmental Services, West Columbia, SC
www.energy.gov/EM
19
Paducah Support for DOECAP
•
During FY 2015, the Paducah site provided support
for the following laboratory audits:
o
o
o
o
•
Lisa Crabtree – GEL and TestAmerica, Earth City, MO.
Kelly Layne – GEL and TestAmerica, Earth City, MO.
Don Dihel – TestAmerica, Earth City, MO.
Cara Mills – MCL, Oak Ridge, TN
During FY 2016, the Paducah site anticipates
supporting the following laboratory audits:
o
o
o
o
Don Dihel–One audits – TBD
Lisa Crabtree–Two audits –TBD
Kelly Layne–Two audits – TBD
Cara Mills – Two audit - TBD
20
www.energy.gov/EM
20
DOECAP Auditor Qualification
Laboratory
Participants
Lead
Lisa Crabtree
1
QA
2
ORG
3
InO
4
Rad
X
5
6
LIMS HRMM
7
GEO
8
AQT
9
NDA
X
Kelly Layne
X
Tom Hines (DOE)
X
Cara Mills
Don Dihel (DOE)
TSD Participants
X
AIT
Lead
X
X
1
QA
2
S&A
Lisa Turner
Don Dihel (DOE)
3
WO
X
X
4
EC/P
5
RAD
6
I/CS
7
TRAN
X
X
X
X
X
AIT
X
X
X
21
www.energy.gov/EM
21
Thank You
www.energy.gov/EM
22