Transcript Document

The Use of Isotope Geochemistry
Stan Hart - CIDER 08
The Use of Isotope Geochemistry (only one?).
The Uses of Isotope Geochemistry (well, let me
count the ways!!).
What am I really going to talk about?
How Isotope Geochemistry can inform us about:
The presence and time evolution of chemical
heterogeneities in the mantle.
• where are they?
• how big are they?
• how old are they?
• what’s their pedigree?
(a.k.a. - animals run amok in the zoo)
CIDER 2008
Tackley, 2000
What’s so hot about mantle plumes?
Workman, 2005
Basic Isotope Systematics
Use 87Sr/86Sr as an example:
87Rb
decays to 87Sr with a half-life of 48.8 Gy
(decay constant  = 1.42e-11 per year)
(87Sr)now = (87Sr)initial + (87Rb)now [exp(t) – 1]
Divide by a suitable non-radiogenic isotope, i.e.
86Sr:
(87Sr/86Sr)now = (87Sr/86Sr)initial + (87Rb/86Sr)now [exp(t) – 1]
Note that the atom ratio
87Rb/86Sr
~ 2.894 * Rb/Sr (ppm weight ratio)
Exactly the same methodology applies to:
147Sm -143Nd, 176Lu -176Hf, 187Re -187Os, 238U -206Pb, 235U -207Pb, 232Th -208Pb
Some are more complex:
U-Th-He system: 238U, 235U and 232Th all have the same 4He daughter.
Pb-Pb system: the parents 238U and 235U are exactly coupled;
the parents 238U and 232Th are approximately coupled.
87Rb
86Sr
87Sr
is not radiogenic
(87Sr/86Sr)now = (87Sr/86Sr)initial + (87Rb/86Sr)now [exp(t) – 1]
Slope ~ Rb/Sr ratio
(87Sr/86Sr)initial
Here the residue has higher Sm/Nd,
compared to previous case where the
residue has lower Rb/Sr.
Slope ~ Sm/Nd
Faure 1986
Anyone see a problem with this plot?
Slope ~ Sm/Nd
Faure 1986
Basic Isotope Systematics
Use 87Sr/86Sr as an example:
87Rb
decays to 87Sr with a half-life of 48.8 Gy
(decay constant  = 1.42e-11 per year)
(87Sr)now = (87Sr)initial + (87Rb)now [exp(t) – 1]
Divide by a suitable non-radiogenic isotope, i.e.
86Sr:
(87Sr/86Sr)now = (87Sr/86Sr)initial + (87Rb/86Sr)now [exp(t) – 1]
Note that the atom ratio
87Rb/86Sr
~ 2.894 * Rb/Sr (ppm weight ratio)
Exactly the same methodology applies to:
147Sm -143Nd, 176Lu -176Hf, 187Re -187Os, 238U -206Pb, 235U -207Pb, 232Th -208Pb
Some are more complex:
U-Th-He system: 238U, 235U and 232Th all have the same 4He daughter.
Pb-Pb system: the parents 238U and 235U are exactly coupled;
the parents 238U and 232Th are approximately coupled.
(206Pb)now = (206Pb)initial + (238U)now [exp(t) – 1]
Divide by a suitable non-radiogenic isotope, i.e.
204Pb:
(206Pb/204Pb)now = (206Pb/204Pb)initial + (238U/204Pb)now [exp(t) – 1]
Initial Pb (FeS in iron meteorites)



Pb 

204
Pb  now 
Pb 
204
Pb  initial



Pb 

204
Pb  now 
Pb 
204
Pb  initial
207
206


207
206



U   e235 t  1 
238
U  now  e238 t  1 
235
U
 1 

constant



238
U  now
137.88 
235
Because this age depends only on an isotope ratio, and because these can be
measured ~ 10 times more precisely than an elemental ratio (such as Sm/Nd,
Rb/Sr, etc), Pb-Pb ages can be determined to spectacular precision!
Amelin et al 2002
Pb-Pb ages on Ca-Al rich inclusions from a CV3 carbonaceous chondrite (Efremovka)
and on individual chondrules from Acfer (a weird Fe-metal rich CH3 chondrite).
= (238U/204Pb)now
Faure 1986



Pb 

204

Pb  now 
Pb 
204
Pb  initial



Pb 

204
Pb  now 
Pb 
204
Pb  initial
207
206
207
206



U   e235 t  1 
238
U  now  e238 t  1 
235
Because the solar nebula has a low U/Pb ratio, evolution of Pb on Earth
doesn’t really get going until Pb is segregated to the core, thereby raising the U/Pb
of the silicate mantle. Here core formation estimated ~ 33 My after Earth accretion.
Note that “primitive Earth” samples must lie
on the Geochron. A bulletproof test!
4He/3He
Isotope Systematics
238U
– 8 4He = 206Pb
235U – 7 4He = 207Pb
232Th – 6 4He = 208Pb
(4He/3He)now = (4He/3He)initial + (238U/3He)now [8 (exp(t) – 1) +
7 (235U/238U)now(exp(t) – 1) +
6 (232Th/238U)now(exp(t) – 1)].
Note that (235U/238U)now is a constant = 0.007253.
Note that (232Th/238U)now is ~ 3.5 (± 1) in mantle rocks.
4He
production today:
4He production at 4.5 Gy:
238U: 235U: 232Th
= 50%: 2%: 48%.
238U: 235U: 232Th = 31%: 50%: 19%.
The “standard model” for He isotope evolution
Continental or oceanic crust
In the standard model, He is more
incompatible than U, so that melt removal
leaves a residue with higher U/He ratio
leading to higher 4He/3He (or lower 3He/4He).
Depleted upper mantle
Bulk silicate Earth
Initial nebula He
isotope ratio
Bulk silicate Earth
Depleted upper mantle
Continental or oceanic crust
Thus higher 3He/4He ratios are deemed
more “primitive. In fact no high 3He/4He
mantle samples lie on the Pb-Pb Geochron,
so cannot truly be “primitive”.
The “inverted model” for He isotope evolution (Parman et al 2005)
Initial nebula He
isotope ratio
Highest 3He/4He mantle
In the inverted model, He is more
compatible than U, so that melt removal
leaves a residue with lower U/He ratio
leading to lower 4He/3He (or higher 3He/4He).
Now higher 3He/4He ratios may indicate older
mantle, but true primitive mantle will have the
LOWEST 3He/4He ratios!
More about Helium in a bit -
Let’s look at Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes in 3-D
Workman et al., 2004
FOZO
Hart et al., 1992
BSE
high He 3/4
The Standard Model
Workman et al., 2004
DUPAL Anomaly
Hart, 1984
Numbers are individual hotspot averages for: (measured 87Sr/86Sr - 0.7000)*10,000
Nd isotope variations along the East Pacific Rise spreading center
Global average N-MORB
(mid-ocean ridge basalt)
Global average OIB (ocean island basalt ~ plumes)
±1
CIDER 2004 Working Group
Hoffman and McKenzie, 1985
-2 blobs of dye in glycerine.
-red dye placed in a region
of chaotic mixing.
- green dye placed in an island
of non-chaotic mixing.
- Top moved left to right, then
bottom moved right to left, 10
cycles.
Ottino, 1989
Geochemists need to know
if the mantle looks and acts
like this, on < km scales!
An excellent new textbook that
does for Isotope Geochemistry
what Turcotte and Schubert did for
Geodynamics.
(no, I’m not being paid!)
Holden, 196x