Transcript Do Mosquito Misting Systems Contribute to Resistance?

Do Mosquito Misting Systems
Contribute to Resistance?
Joseph M. Conlon
Technical Advisor
American Mosquito Control Association
What is Resistance?

The ability, in a population of insects, to
tolerate doses of a pesticide that would be
lethal to the majority of the individuals in a
normal population of the same species, and
developed as a result of the selection pressure
exerted by the insecticide.
Resistance Mechanisms

Pyrethroids – act by binding with sodium
channel protein, causing nerve to be
permanently switched on: “kdr”



Persistent activation of sodium channels by
delaying normal voltage-dependent deactivation
Increase in permeability due to lesions produced
by pyrethroids
Resistance due to altered sodium channel protein
Resistance Mechanisms

Esterases

Bind and sequester


Amplification/over expression of genes encoding
xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes



Culex resistance
Low fitness cost compared to gene structure alteration
Anopheline resistance
kdr – reduction in site sensitivity of the voltage-gated
sodium channels to binding of insecticides

Fitness cost - genes occur at low frequency unless selected for
Resistance Mechanisms

Monooxygenase – P450 gene binds molecular oxygen
and introduces the oxygen molecule into substrate




Elevated in Anopheles and C. quinquefasciatus
Primary mechanism in pyrethrum resistance
High fitness cost due to gene alteration
Glutathione S-transferase (GST)


Binds the insecticide to glutathione, making it more water
soluble
More easily excreted
Resistance Management

Management by Moderation - spare portion of
susceptible genotypes






Low dose
Non-persistent chemicals – no slow release
Leave certain generations untreated
Preserving refugia
Apply locally
High thresholds
Resistance Management

Management by Saturation – overwhelm
defense mechanisms by high dosages



Apply dosages sufficiently high to be lethal to
susceptible as well as heterozygous-resistant
Prevents buildup of homozygous resistant
Use of synergists

May not work with OPs
Resistance Management



Lower selection pressure
Remove selective advantage – increase fitness
cost
IPM
Factors Affecting Resistance
Management

Genetic




Biotic





Migration, mobility, isolation
Monophagy/polyphagy – feeding on many hosts reduces exposure
Chemical




Generations/year
Offspring/generation
Single/multiple matings
Behavior/ecological


Frequency/dominance of resistant alleles - How extensive is resistance
Past selection by other chemicals
Fitness factors – competitive disadvantage
Mode of action
Relationship to previously used chemicals
Persistence
Application



Rate, frequency and size of area
Life stage – treat only one stage
Application threshold – lower thresholds yield quicker resistance
Resistance in Mosquitoes

Harris County Texas – resmethrin (Scourge©)




0.003 lbs AI/acre – no control
0.007 lbs AI/acre – 40% control
Recovered resmethrin mortality at 0.007 lbs AI/acre within
one year of malathion rotation
California

C. tarsalis – resmethrin, permethrin and pyrethrum


Contra Costa, Fresno, Merced, Riverside, Sacramento
C. pipiens – pyrethrum, permethrin, deltamethrin and
lambda-cyhalothrin

Marin
Do MMS Contribute To Resistance?

Sublethal dosing – increases selection pressure






90% control in heavily vegetated areas may
require 2x-3x maximum label rate
Resistance not monitored
No rotation of insecticides
May kill natural predators in foliage
Saturation in one area promotes resistance
Lessens incentive for IPM implementation