Transcript Ethics

When we think of advances in technology we have to consider the affect they
will have on society.
The decisions we make today can have far reaching consequences.
Now that we are able to manipulate child birth and are beginning to unlock the
secrets behind genes, we must decide if just because we can do something,
should we??
Ethics
These are a set of principles on how to conduct ourselves based
on our morals and values. We each have our own ideas of what is
right or wrong and we use these everyday to make decisions.
Thinking of what you have learnt so far, you are now going to
discuss your beliefs.
Do you believe it is right or wrong?
An area for debate is what genetic disorders can a baby be tested
for during pregnancy. Pregnant women are routinely offered
screening for genetic disorders such as Down's syndrome, but
there is concern about the growing number of tests.
Last year doctors aborted a foetus beyond 24 weeks' gestation
because the mother, taking advice from doctors, did not want a
baby with a cleft palate.
A cleft palate is not life threatening and usually is only a
cosmetic concern. So should a foetus be aborted because they may
look slightly different from other children even though they are
healthy? Or are we saving the child from the torment of bullying
due to its differing looks?
Where do we draw the line about what
is an imperfection and what is
disease and disability?
"This raises crucial questions about to what extent our genetic make-up will
determine our future lives. This is something that society has to decide, using
these techniques, who should live and who shouldn't,"
Helen Wallace of the science policy group Genewatch.org
"At the heart of the issue is where do we, as a
society, strike a balance between individual needs
and wants and the wider social consequences of the
decisions we make.”
Baroness Helena Kennedy, chair of the Human Genetics Commission,
There is controversy over issues such as ‘Designer
babies’, using siblings to ‘save’ others and what laws
there should be.
As the future generation these decisions will be
made by you and affect your lives.
Pro-life people believe that human life begins the moment the
sperm fertilises the egg (conception). This means that every
unsuitable embryo that is disposed of is a person who is killed.
If you believe that life begins at conception the technique is
morally wrong.
Is it possible to tell what genes will be useful to future
generations?
If we begin to ensure no-one is born with the gene for Sickle
Cell Anaemia, we lose the protection it provides from being
infected with Malaria, an even worse disease.
Is it right for people to choose their child’s
appearance on a whim of fashion?
Imagine a class of five-year-olds where half the
boys have David Beckham’s cheekbones!
If everyone has the same genes, rather than a range
of genes, then the whole population could be wiped
out by a new disease.
With a range of genes, some people could be
naturally resistant to the infection.
Are we………………..
……… interfering with nature?
……….going against God’s will?
………trying to do the best for the next generation using
techniques available?
……… developing useful new techniques but they need
regulation?
…………. making a fuss over nothing, these are just media
scare stories
You decide
My personal views and my views for society
differ. I think it should only be done for
medical terms. But I know if it was my
child I might think differently.
I no longer fear ‘ Designer babies’: the
media stereotype of blond hair and blue
eyes.
Education is important because you
need to educate people that not every
genetic illness is a prison sentence.
Saviour siblings - the danger of seeing
the saviour as a possession or loving
them more than the ‘non - saviour’
worries me.
Citizens’ jury opinions
c/o Techniquest.org
Your views