Mutational Analysis of the Enzymatic Domain of Clostridium difficile

Download Report

Transcript Mutational Analysis of the Enzymatic Domain of Clostridium difficile

Mutational Analysis of the
Enzymatic Domain of Clostridium
difficile Toxin B Reveals Novel
Inhibitors of the Wild-Type Toxin
Authors: Lea M. Spyres, Jeremy Daniel, Amy
Hensley, Maen Qa’Dan, William Ortiz-Leduc,
and Jimmy D, Ballard
Presented by: S. Camphor
Background
• Clostridium difficile (C.difficile)
-gram positive
-anaerobic
-spore former
-major cause of hospital acquired diarrhea
& Pseudomembranous colitis
-some cases colitis is life-threatening
Background ….
• What is pseudomembranous colitis?
-severe irritation of the colon
-caused by C.difficile when the normal flora of
the gut is wiped out due to antibiotic use
-illness characteristics
1. diarrhea
2. fever
3. abdominal cramping/pain
Background continued…..
Statistics (U.S.)
C. difficile
• Found that:
-20% of hospitalized patients suffer
(about 3 million cases/year)
-30% of these develop diarrhea
• Asymptomatic:
-2%-3% of healthy adults
-70% of healthy infants and youth
-low mortality/morbidity rate
(10%-30% of seriously ill will die)
Introduction….
• Current treatment:
-Antibiotics ( could this perpetuate the problem?)
-supportive therapy
• New treatments:
-Tx with Saccharomyeces boulardii
• Future treatments:
-therapeutics that target major virulent factors to
prevent major cell specific cytoxic activities.
Intro continued…….
• Toxins A & B
-LCTs (Large clostridial toxins)
-involved in development of colitis
-toxin A enterotoxin
• Toxin B (cytotoxin)
-glucosylates isoforms of Rho, Rac, and Cdc 42.
-structures:- enzymatic
- translocation
- receptor binding domains
-triggers caspase-dependent / independent
apoptosis
Intro continued…..
• Tcd B enzymatic domain focus:
-activity requires all 546 amino terminal
amino acids
-if deletion in amino or carboxy terminal a
reduction in activity is seen
Toxin B as a target for drug
therapy?
• Toxin B
- possible drug therapy through activity
inhibition
- Paper: investigates use of mutants to
block CPEs (cytopathic effects)
Materials and Methods…
• Created fusion proteins using lfn (
encodes Ag binding region of anthrax
toxin lethal factor)
- 4 with deletions
- 3 site-directed mutations
(mutations and deletions in enzymatic
domain)
• Fusion proteins used in various assays to
determine inhibition capabilities of Tcd B.
Results:
Figure 1 A/B:
A: deletion and site-directed mutants used in study
B: SDS-PAGE analysis of histone fused tags.
Lfn- used for
mutants to
gain entry
into the cell.
Table 1:Glucosylhydrolase activity using UDP-glucose as a
substrate to determine if defective hydrolase activity was the
reason for inability for target modification
Results …..
Figure 2 A/B Glucosylation activity of Mutants
A: SDS-PAGE of each mutant and TcdB glucosylation acitivity on RhoA,
Rac1 and Cdc 42
B: LFnTcdB 1-500 test to see if deletion mutant attenuated modification of
substrate
Figure 3A: actin condensation and cell
rounding in the inhibitor assay.
Figure 3B: Summary of inhibitors capable of blocking
TcdB CPEs.
- Antagonistic impact on Toxin B intoxication
- Inhibition decrease over time
Legend:
Solid: LFnTcdB1420
Open: LFnTcdB
w102A
Dotted:
LFnTcdB c365w
Checkered:
LFnTcdB 33-556
Hatched: LFn
TcdB1-500
Figure 4:
Monitoring of CPEs. Are the inhibitory effects really
limited?
- more than 50% of cells show no sign of CPEs.
Figure 5:
Is inhibition occurring in the cytosol?
Use CHO cell line that induce expression of TcdB1-556
Eventually
presence of
CPEs
because of
cells
continuous
production of
TcdB1-556
Figure 6: Is inhibition due to competition for substrate or
co-substrate?
-TcdB1-500 added to see if protection from TcsL
-Both TcsL and TcdB share Rac as a common substrate.
almost 50%
block of TcsL
Discussion
• Mutants
-don’t modify substrate
-have cytosolic functions that allow
inhibition
Question:
-Is the inhibition occurring because of
prevented access of UDP-glucose to toxin
B?
Discussion…
• TcsL assay
-show inhibition at cosubstrate level b/c
only Rac in common with Toxin B
-effects would be less effective on TcsL if
Rho, Rac and Cdc42 involved
-inhibition at the co-substrate level
because no effect seen with Tcnα
Future use…
• This study provides possibility of useful
therapeutic treatments in the future,
targeting toxin B.
• Cell surface studies to better understand
the surface interacting regions
• More studies on inactive mutants in other
viruses