Transcript Document

Reflections on Asthma Treatment with
Omalizumab
Mary C. Tobin MD
Director, Clinical Services
University Consultants in
Allergy/Immunology
Reflections on Asthma Treatment with
Omalizumab
Disclosure of Conflict of Interest Information
I have the following relationships that exist related to this
presentation:
Co-Investigator/Investigator initiated research: IgE receptors
on neutrophils in IgE mediated asthma
Speakers’ Bureau
Glaxo-SmithKline
Novartis
Genetech
Disclosure information stated above is current as of November 18,
2008
Omalizumab
• Clinical trials with omalizumab= 60
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Allergic asthma
Seasonal allergic rhinitis
Food allergy
Eosinophilic esophagitis
Atopic dermatitis
Bullous pemphigoid
Urticaria
Cystic fibrosis with ABPA
Basic science
• Allergy cells
• Markers of inflammation
• Airway hypersensitivity
Treatment of moderate to severe persistent Asthma
Anti-IgE
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Phase IIIb, Multi-center, Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled
Study of Omalizumab in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Persistent
Asthma Inadequately Controlled with High Dose Inhaled
Corticosteroids and Long- Acting Beta -Agonists
• EXTRA
Background: IgE plays a key role in inflammation. A
decrease in free IgE causes a decrease in the
initiation of Ag responses in patients with asthma.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and
tolerability of SQ injections of Omalizumab vs..
placebo as add-on therapy to high-dose ICS+LABA
for subjects with moderate to severe persistent
asthma inadequately controlled as judged by asthma
exacerbations requiring treatment with oral steroids
during a 48 week treatment period.
EXTRA
• Methods: 850 subjects 12-75 years of age on
high dose ICS and LABA with inadequately
controlled asthma. Subjects received 48 weeks
of study drug (Omalizumab or placebo) in
addition to ICS+LABA
• Results: Primary outcome: Asthma
exacerbations such as ED/hospitalizations, oral
steroid use during the 48 week study period
EXTRA
• Results:
– Secondary outcomes:
• Change from baseline to week 48 in overall
asthma-related quality of life.
• Change from baseline to week 48 in nocturnal and
daytime asthma symptom scores
• Change in baseline to week 48 in the number of
puffs/day of beta-agonist rescue medication
• Frequency and severity of treatment-emergent
adverse events during the 48-week treatment
period.
Omalizumab
• University Consultants in Allergy/Immunology
– Retrospective evaluation
• 26 patients who have been on or recently started
Omalizumab.
– 23 patients for asthma (age 13-76 years)
» 7 males and 16 females
» 22 patients had severe persistent asthma
» 1 patient had mild asthma with severe allergic rhinitis
and anaphylaxis to IT
Omalizumab
• 3 patients started Omalizumab for urticaria
resistant to multiple antihistamines, montelukast,
cytotoxic agents
– 1/3 had resolution of urticaria with 6 months of therapy
and has been discontinued for 2 months
– One of the patients who did not improve has been
diagnosed with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis
Omalizumab
• Asthma patients
– 21 patients have had at least 3 months of therapy
• 2/21 patients did not respond and received therapy for 12
months-no decrease in steroid use, no improvement in ACT
scores
• 19 patients had some improvement with decrease in oral
steroids, high dose ICS, decrease in beta-agonist use,
decrease in nocturnal awakening and improvement in ACT
scores.
• 14 patients have had dramatic improvement
–
–
–
–
Step down to moderate persistent
Decrease dose of oral steroids to none or less than 9 mg/day
Normalization of ACT scores
No ED or hospitalization
Omalizumab
• 3 patients had asthma with nasal polyps
– 2/3 patients had a decrease in the size of the polyps
and in the number of sinus infections
• 2 patients had a component of COPD and seemed to
take longer to respond
Omalizumab
• Issues of concern
– Adverse reactions:
• First dose- shortness of breath and urticaria-drug stopped by
allergist
• Sixth dose- pruritic rash-drug stopped by allergist
– When should the drug be stopped or restarted?
• If patient is responding what adjustments could be made?
• Should skin testing be done with the drug to assess potential
mechanism?
Omalizumab
– Issues of Concern:
• Patient compliance:
– Responders tend to decrease medication too quickly on
their own and then have an exacerbation
– Responders tend to stop coming because they are better
– Insurance companies deny continuing drug because
“they don’t need it anymore”
Omalizumab
• Final reflections:
– Patients with asthma should be evaluated for
allergies. Allergies are present in at least
50% of asthmatics age 50 years or younger
Patients with moderate to severe persistent
IgE mediated asthma should be considered
for Omalizumab
• If there IgE level is less than 30, repeat when off
steroid burst for 4 weeks
• Risk of adverse reactions is relatively low and
benefit can be life-changing
Omalizumab
• Nagging Questions for the future:
– When to stop Omalizumab???????
• 1 patient just stopped after 4.5 years- She had had severe
asthma since childhood with multiple hospitalization. She is
only on antihistamine, nasal steroid, and montelukast.
• 1 patient stopped after 3 years because of college- no update
yet
– When she stopped Omalizumab prior to this after 6 months she
would return to her pre-Omalizumab status- severe persistent and
react to minute amounts of peanut.
– Some patients stopped coming on there own. Is
there any danger in this?
– Some patients have been stopped at 12 months
who were benefiting from therapy? Is that long
enough?