Transcript Slide 1

DRUG TESTING 101: CONDENSED
Jeff Sims, C-SAPA, C-SI
Past President, Substance Abuse Program Administrators
Association
President, a’ TEST consultants, inc.
SPONSORED BY:
OVERVIEW
 1. The Drug Testing Industry
 2. Why drug test?
 3. How and When do You Test?
 4. Specimen Types: Traditional vs Alternative
 5. Drug Testing Panels: Not one size fits all!
 6. Validity Testing and Adulterant Products
 7. Reporting Requirements
 8. Current Federally Mandated Programs
 9. Pending Drug Testing Legislation and Current Industry Issues
 10. Questions and Answer
1. THE DRUG TESTING INDUSTRY
DRUG TESTING INDUSTRY
PLAYERS AND THEIR ROLE
 Laboratories
 Third-party administrators (TPAs) and background
screening retailers
 Collection sites and collectors
 Medical Review Officers
 Manufacturers / Distributors
2. WHY DO COMPANIES DRUG TEST?
HOW DID WE GET TO THIS POINT?
 Most aggressive actions occurred since the late 1980’s:
- The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (directed U.S. Secretary of Labor to initiate
efforts to address the issue)
- President Reagan’s Executive Order 12564, Drug-Free Federal Workplace (made
it a condition of employment to refrain from using illegal drugs)
- Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (required federal contractors and grantees to
have drug-free workplaces)
- Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1998 (establish grant programs that assist small
businesses in developing drug-free workplaces)
- Omnibus Employee Testing Act of 1991 (required transportation industry
employers to conduct alcohol and drug testing for employees in “safety sensitive”
positions) It created a model for non-regulated employers now follow.
THE U.S. DRUG AND ALCOHOL PROBLEM
 In 2006, estimated 20.4 million Americans were current
illicit drug users, which is a rate of 8% among all Americans.
No significant changes in recent years.
 About 57 million people, or more than one-fifth (23.0 %) of
the population age 12 and over, participated in binge
drinking (having five or more drinks one the same occasion
at least once in the past 30 days).
DRUG ABUSERS AS EMPLOYEES
 More likely to be involved in an accident and file a workers’
compensation claim
 More likely to quit or get fired
 More likely to steal from workplace
 More likely to miss work
 More likely to be in a confrontation
 Less productive
THE IMPACT ON SAFETY
Substance abusers are:
 3.6 times more likely to be involved in a workplace accident
 5 times more likely to file a workers’ compensation claim
 As many as 50% of all workers’ compensation claims involve
substance abuse
THE IMPACT ON SAFETY
80% of those injured in “serious”
drug-related accidents at work
are not the drug abusing employees…
but innocent co-workers
and others.
BOTTOM LINE
On average it cost an employer almost
$7000.00
per substance abusing employee
5 KEY COMPONENTS
A comprehensive drug-free
workplace program includes:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Policy
Supervisor training
Employee education
Employee assistance
Drug testing (Alcohol testing)
3. HOW AND WHEN DO YOU TEST?
HOW TO TEST?
 Traditional laboratory based urine testing using:
•
Screen
•
Confirmation
 Alternative specimen
 Rapid result or also known
as POCT using professional collectors
 Medical review officer verification
When to Tests
Pre-Employment
Random
Post-Accident
Reasonable Cause/Suspicion
Return-to-Duty
Follow-Up
4. SPECIMEN TYPES:
TRADITIONAL VS ALTERNATIVE
SPECIMEN TYPES
Which specimen meets your needs?
Urine (lab and rapid result analysis)
Hair (on-site collection; lab analysis required)
Oral Fluids (rapid result and lab analysis)
Sweat Testing (rapid result and lab analysis)
Blood Testing (lab analysis)
SPECIMEN TYPES
Urine?
 Legally sound
 Federally endorsed
 Most common
 Invasive
 Subject to adulteration
 Split Testing
ALTERNATIVE SPECIMENS
Hair?
 Window of 90 days minus recent 7-10 days
 Legally still being tested
 Lacks federal endorsement
 About 1-2% usage
 Invasive
 Scientifically questionable?
 Pre-employment tool
ALTERNATIVE SPECIMENS
Oral Fluid?
Window 4-24+ hours
Limited legal exposure
Getting federal endorsements (alcohol only)
Least invasive
Comparable to blood
Adulteration resistant
“Under the influence” indicator
5.
DRUG TESTING PANELS AND PRICE:
NOT ONE SIZE FITS ALL!
FEDERALLY MANDATED TESTING
PANEL
The primary drugs of abuse
 Marijuana
 Cocaine
 Opiates
 Amphetamines
 Phencyclidine (PCP)
ADDITIONAL DRUGS BEING TESTING
 Hydromorphone
 Oxycodone
 Oxymorphone
 Hydrocodone
 Propoxyphene
 Ecstasy
 Benzodiazepines
 Barbiturates
 Methadone
6. VALIDITY TESTING AND
ADULTERANT PRODUCTS
ADULTERATED, SUBSTITUTED
SPECIMEN
Internet provides a list of
suppliers with information on
beating drug, alcohol or hair
testing
Bleach, soap,Visine, other
substances
Purging with water, other
liquids
“Rapid” on-site drug test are
the most vulnerable
Innovative Resources, Inc.
ADULTERANTS
SPONSORED BY:
7. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
FEDERAL VS NON FEDERAL
TO BE COMPLETED BEFORE REPORT
 If it is a Federally mandated test (This would include US DOT)
a. Must receive certifying scientist signed copy
b. Must have MRO copy of CCF
 Non Federal? Any other requirements?
a. State Laws (Arkansas Law Rule 36, Act 750)
b. Safe Harbor
TRANSMISSION OF RESULTS
Typical
Reporting:
1. Web
2. Text
message
with
reference to
web
3. Fax
4. Mail
(yuck!)
5. Phone
(yuckier!)
BACK OFFICE SUPPORT APPS
STORAGE OF RESULTS
Subject to audit and must be stored in a secure
environment
Must maintain in accordance with state or federal
requirements
Under federal rules, subject to release and must be
forwarded upon termination of clients agreement
to new MRO (FAA example)
8. CURRENT FEDERALLY MANDATED
PROGRAMS
REGULATORY SCOPE OF WHO IS IMPACTED
THROUGH US DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
INDUSTRY
DOT MODE
Highway
FMCSA
Railroad
# EMPLOYERS
# EMPLOYEES
650,000
10,941,000
FRA
650
97,000
Aviation
FAA
7,200
525,000
Transit
FTA
2,600
250,000
Pipeline
PHMSA
2,450
190,000
Maritime
USCG -DHS
12,000
132,000
674,900
12,135,000
TOTAL
WHO ELSE IS FEDERALLY MANDATED?
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Department of Defense
NASA
Transportation Security Administration
And other federal agencies covered under the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1988.
What’s on the horizon?????
Don’t rule out new safety sensitive industry groups
(electricians, construction, miners, etc..)
9. PENDING DRUG TESTING LEGISLATION
AND CURRENT INDUSTRY ISSUES
MANDATORY POSITIVE DRUG TEST
REPORTING TO STATES
 Several states have created databases
 Specific to commercial drivers license
 Result transmission straight from the MRO and employer,
or severe penalties
 Positive alcohol test, employer reports
 Great idea, but why don’t they work at this point?
NATIONAL DRIVER DATABASE
 Congress funded a study in 1999
 Report released to in 2004
 In early 2007, FOXNews Minnesota
5 Collection sites Inspected
 Congress is involved, GAO investigation with testimony by SAPAA, ATA, IOOA,
FMCA, ODAPC, Oregon State Police
 Working with House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee to tighten
programs
NEW ACTION ITEMS
 Revisit the Drug Testing Integrity Act
 Implementation of the Driver Database, but include a drug
testing repository
 Have MRO’s, Consortia, and TPA’s do the reporting
 Hire more agents to inspect employers AND collection sites
 New NPRM’s issued, by SAMHSA, US DOT, and operating
modes.
10. Any Questions / Discussion
Contact Jeff @ 800.837.8648, Ext 117, or by email
@ [email protected]
THANKS!
SPONSORED BY: