Transcript ch16x

Price Levels and the Exchange
Rate in the Long Run
Chapter 16
International Economics
Udayan Roy
Long Run and Short Run
• Long run theories are useful when all prices of inputs
and outputs have enough time to adjust fully to
changes in supply and demand.
• In the short run, some prices of inputs and outputs
may not have time to adjust, due to labor contracts,
costs of adjustment, or imperfect information about
market demand.
• This chapter discusses a theory of the long run
behavior of a “small” economy with flexible exchange
rates under perfect capital mobility
16-2
Long Run and Short Run
Variable
Long Run
Short Run
P, the overall price level
Endogenous
Exogenous
Y, inflation-adjusted GNP
Exogenous
Endogenous
Ee, expected future value of the exchange rate
Endogenous
Exogenous
Every theory consist of exogenous variables and endogenous variables.
Endogenous variables are those variables whose up and down movements the theory is
trying to explain.
Exogenous variables are those variables that the theory finds useful in explaining the up
and down movements of the endogenous variables. However, the theory has nothing to
say about the up and down movements of the exogenous variables. In other words, the
exogenous variables are mystery variables. Changes in the exogenous variables explain
changes in the endogenous variables, but the theory has no idea why the exogenous
variables occasionally change in value.
Ch. 16 Overview
• Long-run analysis
– Real variables
– Nominal variables
• Flexible exchange rates
– We will study fixed exchange rates in Chapter 18
See subsection “The Real Exchange Rate” of Chapter 16
THE REAL EXCHANGE RATE
The Real Exchange Rate
• We discussed exchange rates in Chapter 14
– Example: €1 = $1.50
• Those exchange rates are nominal exchange
rates
• Now we’ll discuss real exchange rates
The Real Exchange Rate
• Let us consider the price of an iPhone in US
and Europe:
– In US, it is PUS = $200
– In Europe, it is PE = €150
– The value of the euro is E = 2 dollars per euro
– So, Europe’s price in dollars is E × PE = $300
– So, each iPhone in Europe costs as much as 1.5
iPhones in US
– E × PE / PUS = 1.5
– This is the real dollar/euro Exchange Rate for
iPhones
The Real Exchange Rate
• In general, the real exchange
rate is a broad summary
measure of the prices of one
country’s goods and services
relative to another’s.
– The real dollar/euro exchange
rate is the number of US
reference commodity
baskets—not just iPhones—
that one European reference
commodity basket is worth
– Equation (16-6) in KOM 10e
E$ /  PE
q$ / 
PUS
E$/€ is the nominal exchange rate, the
price of one euro in dollars
PE is the overall price level in Europe, such
as the consumer price index
PUS is the overall price level in the United
States
Depreciation and Appreciation
Euro
Dollar
Europe’s exports
America’s exports
q$/€↑ Real
Real
More expensive
Appreciation Depreciation
Less expensive
q$/€↓ Real
Real
Less expensive
Depreciation Appreciation
More expensive
The Real Exchange Rate
• Example: If the European reference
commodity basket costs €100, the U.S. basket
costs $120, and the nominal exchange rate is
$1.20 per euro, then the real dollar/euro
exchange rate (q$/€) is 1 U.S. basket per
European basket.
Real Depreciation and Appreciation
• Real depreciation of the dollar against the euro
– A rise in the real dollar/euro exchange rate (q$/€↑)
• is a fall in the purchasing power of a dollar within Europe’s borders
relative to its purchasing power within the United States
• Or alternatively, a fall in the purchasing power of America’s
products in general over Europe’s.
• Real appreciation of the dollar against the euro is
the opposite of a real depreciation: a fall in q$/€.
This is the simplest long-run theory of the real exchange rate. It is also
called the Law of One Price
REAL EXCHANGE RATE IN THE LONG
RUN I: ABSOLUTE PPP
Absolute PPP
• A very simple theory of the real exchange rate
is called Absolute Purchasing Power Parity
• It says that:
q=1
• Why?
Law of One Price
• Going back for a second to the iPhone
example, one can argue that PUS, the dollar
price in the US, ought to be equal to E × PE,
the dollar price in Europe. That is,
• E × PE = PUS.
• In general, E$/€ x PE = PUS.
• Therefore, q$/€ = (E$/€ x PE)/PUS = 1.
• This is the Law of One Price or Absolute
Purchasing Power Parity.
Law of One Price for Hamburgers?
Some Meaty
Evidence on
the Law of
One Price
Empirical Evidence on PPP and the Law
of One Price
• International price comparisons typically
conclude that absolute PPP is way off the
mark
• The prices of identical goods, when converted
to a single currency, differ substantially across
countries
• So, we need a different theory
• For that we’ll look at equilibrium in the goods
market
This is our second theory of the real exchange rate in the long run.
Equilibrium in the markets for goods and services requires that the output of
goods and services be equal to the demand for goods and services
This is from Chapter 17, but let’s do it now anyway
REAL EXCHANGE RATE IN THE LONG
RUN II: RELATIVE PPP
Determinants of Aggregate Demand
•
•
Aggregate demand (D) is the aggregate amount of
goods and services that people are willing to buy.
It consists of the following types of expenditure:
1.
2.
3.
4.
•
consumption expenditure (C)
investment expenditure (I)
government purchases (G)
net expenditure by foreigners: the current account (CA)
So, aggregate demand for the domestic country’s
output is 𝑫 = 𝑪 + 𝑰 + 𝑮 + 𝑪𝑨
16-19
The Four Components of Aggregate
Demand
• We need to specify the factors that determine
C, I, G, and CA
Determinants of Aggregate Demand
• Assumption: Consumption expenditure (C) increases when
disposable income (Y − T)—which is income (Y) minus taxes
(T)—increases
– … but by less than the increase in disposable income
– Real interest rates may influence the amount of saving and
consumption, but we assume that they are relatively
unimportant here.
– Wealth may also influence consumption, but we assume that it
is relatively unimportant here.
• 𝑪 = 𝑪𝟎 + 𝑪𝒚 ∙ 𝒀 − 𝑻
16-21
Determinants of Aggregate Demand
• 𝐶 = 𝐶0 + 𝐶𝑦 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇
– 𝐶𝑦 is the Marginal Propensity to Consume. It is the
increase in consumption spending when after-tax income
increases by one unit. Therefore, it is a positive fraction: 0
< 𝐶𝑦 < 1
– 𝐶0 is exogenous consumption. This is what consumption
spending would be when after-tax income is zero. 𝐶0
reflects the impact on consumption spending of all factors
other than after-tax income. For example, 𝐶0 may change
when there are changes in interest rates, households’
wealth, or consumers’ confidence
16-22
Determinants of Aggregate Demand
• Both investment spending (I) and government
spending (G) are assumed to be exogenous
– Consequently, although the theory does discuss
how changes in I and G affect endogenous
variables such as Y and E, it has no idea what
makes I and G fluctuate
Determinants of Aggregate Demand
• Assumption: The balance on the current account (CA)
increases …
– … when the real exchange rate (q) increases
• Recall that the real exchange rate is the price of foreign products
relative to the price of domestic products: q = EP*/P
– … when disposable income decreases
• more disposable income (Y-T) means more expenditure on foreign
products (imports). Therefore, when Y−T rises, CA falls.
• 𝑪𝑨 = 𝑪𝑨𝟎 + 𝑪𝑨𝒒 ∙ 𝒒 − 𝑪𝑨𝒎 ∙ 𝒀 − 𝑻
16-24
Determinants of Aggregate Demand
• 𝐶𝐴 = 𝐶𝐴0 + 𝐶𝐴𝑞 ∙ 𝑞 − 𝐶𝐴𝑚 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇
– 𝐶𝐴𝑞 is the increase in the domestic country’s
current account when the real exchange rate
increases by one unit.
– Any increase (decrease) in the tariff on imported
goods leads to an increase (decrease) in 𝐶𝐴𝑞 .
– Note that 𝐶𝐴𝑞 > 0
16-25
Determinants of Aggregate Demand
• 𝐶𝐴 = 𝐶𝐴0 + 𝐶𝐴𝑞 ∙ 𝑞 − 𝐶𝐴𝑚 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇
– 𝐶𝐴𝑚 is the decrease in the domestic country’s
current account (or, net exports) when after-tax
income increases by one unit. When after-tax
income increases by one unit, consumption
spending increases by 𝐶𝑦 units. Part of this
increase in consumption is imported, and this is
denoted 𝐶𝐴𝑚 .
– Therefore, 0 < 𝐶𝐴𝑚 < 𝐶𝑦 , which also means
𝐶𝑦 − 𝐶𝐴𝑚 > 0.
16-26
Determinants of Aggregate Demand
• 𝐶𝐴 = 𝐶𝐴0 + 𝐶𝐴𝑞 ∙ 𝑞 − 𝐶𝐴𝑚 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇
– 𝐶𝐴0 is exogenous net exports.
– 𝐶𝐴0 reflects the impact on the domestic country’s
current account of all factors other than the real
exchange rate and after-tax income.
– For example, 𝐶𝐴0 may increase when there is an
increase in the foreign country’s GNP
16-27
Determinants of Aggregate Demand
• 𝐶 = 𝐶0 + 𝐶𝑦 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇
• 𝐶𝐴 = 𝐶𝐴0 + 𝐶𝐴𝑞 ∙ 𝑞 − 𝐶𝐴𝑚 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇
• 𝐷 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺 + 𝐶𝐴
• Therefore, 𝐷 = 𝐶0 + 𝐶𝑦 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇 + 𝐼 + 𝐺 +
𝐶𝐴0 + 𝐶𝐴𝑞 ∙ 𝑞 − 𝐶𝐴𝑚 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇
Short-Run Equilibrium in the Goods
Market
• For the goods market to be in equilibrium,
GNP must equal aggregate demand: 𝒀 = 𝑫
• Therefore, 𝐷 = 𝐶0 + 𝐶𝑦 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇 + 𝐼 + 𝐺 +
𝐶𝐴0 + 𝐶𝐴𝑞 ∙ 𝑞 − 𝐶𝐴𝑚 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇 becomes 𝒀 =
𝑪𝟎 + 𝑪𝒚 ∙ 𝒀 − 𝑻 + 𝑰 + 𝑮 + 𝑪𝑨𝟎 + 𝑪𝑨𝒒 ∙
𝒒 − 𝑪𝑨𝒎 ∙ 𝒀 − 𝑻
• This equation represents equilibrium in the
domestic country’s goods markets
Y  C0  C y  Y  T   I  G  CA0  CAq  q  CAm  Y  T 
Y  C0  C y  Y  C y  T  I  G  CA0  CAq  q  CAm  Y  CAm  T
Y  C0  C y  CAm  Y  C y  CAm  T  I  G  CA0  CAq  q
Y  C y  CAm  Y  C0  C y  CAm  T  I  G  CA0  CAq  q
1  C
y
 CAm  Y  C0  C y  CAm  T  I  G  CA0  CAq  q
Now focus on this
equation.
1  C
1  C
y
 CAm  Y  C0  C y  CAm  T  I  G  CA0  CAq  q
y
 CAm  Y  C0  C y  CAm  T  I  G  CA0
CAq
q
Output: The Long Run
• The real GNP produced when all resources are
fully utilized is known by various names:
– Long-run GNP
– Natural GNP
– Full-employment GNP
– Potential GNP(Yf)
• Assumption: In the long run, the economy
makes full use of all its resources
• Therefore, in long-run equilibrium, Y = Yf.
Output: The Long Run
• The full-employment output, Yf, is assumed to
be exogenous
• Y = Yf is what we call a solution because it
expresses an endogenous variable entirely in
terms of exogenous variables
The Real Exchange Rate: The Long Run
1  C
y
 CAm  Y  C0  C y  CAm  T  I  G  CA0
CAq

1  C
q
q
f



CA

Y
 C0  C y  CAm  T  I  G  CA0
y
m
CAq
This is the long-run value of the real exchange rate. Note that all variables on the righthand side of the equation are exogenous. Therefore, this is the solution. We cannot say
anything more about the real exchange rate in the long run.
Long-run predictions: The price of foreign goods (in units of domestic goods) will be
higher if, in the domestic economy, either full-employment output or tax revenue is
higher, or if exogenous consumption, investment, government spending or exogenous
current account balance is lower.
Real Exchange Rate in the Long Run
• It follows that:
When the supply of domestic goods
increases, they will be cheaper relative to
foreign goods. So, Yf↑ causes q↑.
output (Yf) has a direct effect on
– Full-employment
the real exchange rate (q)
– Taxes (T) have a direct effect too
– C0 + I + G + CA0 and CAq have inverse effects on the
real exchange rate (q) When the demand for domestic goods
increases, they will be more expensive
relative to foreign goods, causing q↓.

1  C
q
f



CA

Y
 C y  CAm  T  C0  I  G  CA0 
y
m
CAq
Exercises
• How is the real exchange rate affected in the
long run by a permanent increase in:
– fiscal stimulus?
– money supply?
– foreigners’ preference for domestic products?
– tariffs on imported goods?
– foreign/domestic income and household wealth?

1  C
q
f



CA

Y
 C y  CAm  T  C0  I  G  CA0 
y
m
CAq
The Long Run and Monetary Neutrality
• The macroeconomic analysis of the long run is
characterized by the concept of monetary
neutrality
• That is, monetary arrangements and monetary
policy have no effect on the behavior of real
variables
• Therefore, the predictions summarized on the
previous slide are true for both the flexible
exchange rate system of this chapter and the fixed
exchange rate system of Chapter 18
The following results are true under either absolute or relative
purchasing power parity
FURTHER IMPLICATIONS OF
PURCHASING POWER PARITY
Absolute and Relative PPP
• This chapter considers both Absolute PPP and
Relative PPP
– Absolute PPP: q = 1
– Relative PPP: q = 𝑞 a constant, not necessarily 1
• The results in the following slides are true
under both APPP and RPPP
Prices and the Exchange Rate
• Relative PPP says: 𝑞 =
• Therefore, 𝐸 = 𝑞 ∙
𝐸∙𝑃∗
𝑃
=𝑞
𝑃
𝑃∗
• Therefore, as 𝑞 is assumed constant in the
long run, the faster domestic prices (P) grow,
the faster the foreign currency’s exchange
value (E) will grow
• And, the faster foreign prices (P*) grow, the
slower the foreign currency’s exchange value
(E) will grow
Prices and the Exchange Rate
• In general, 𝐸𝑔 = 𝜋 − 𝜋
∗
Equation (16-2) of the
textbook, KOM 10e
– where Eg is the growth rate of E. This is the
appreciation rate of the foreign currency
– π* is the foreign inflation rate, and
– π is the domestic inflation rate
• Example: If US inflation is 3% a year and
Canadian inflation is 1% a year, then the
exchange value of the Canadian dollar,
measured in US dollars, will increase 2% a year
The Interest Rate
• We have seen in Chapter 15 that the interest
parity equation is 𝑅 = 𝑅∗ +
𝐸 𝑒 −𝐸
𝐸
• The second term on the right-hand side is the
expected appreciation rate of the foreign
currency
• Assumption: The expected appreciation rate is
assumed to be equal to the actual
appreciation rate (Eg), in the long run
The Interest Rate
• Therefore, 𝑅 = 𝑅
∗
𝐸 𝑒 −𝐸
+
𝐸
= 𝑅∗ + 𝐸𝑔
• We saw two slides earlier that 𝐸𝑔 = 𝜋 − 𝜋 ∗
• Therefore, 𝑅 = 𝑅∗ + 𝜋 − 𝜋 ∗
Equation (16-5) of the
textbook, KOM 10e
• Assumption: The foreign interest rate (R*) and
the foreign inflation rate (π*) will be assumed
to be exogenous constants
The Interest Rate: Fisher Effect
• 𝑅 = 𝑅∗ + 𝜋 − 𝜋 ∗
• As the foreign interest rate (R*) and the
foreign inflation rate (π*) are assumed to be
exogenous constants, any change in the
domestic inflation rate will cause an equal
change (both in magnitude and direction) in
the domestic nominal interest rate
• This is called the Fisher Effect
– See “The Fisher Effect” in Ch. 16 of the textbook
Real Interest Rate Parity
• 𝑅 = 𝑅 ∗ + 𝜋 − 𝜋 ∗ implies 𝑅 − 𝜋 = 𝑅 ∗ − 𝜋 ∗
• R is the nominal interest rate.
– It tells you how fast the dollar value of your wealth is
increasing
• R – π is the real (or, inflation-adjusted) interest
rate.
– It tells you how fast the purchasing power of your
wealth is increasing
• We now see that in the long run equilibrium, real
interest rates must be equal in all countries
The Interest Rate
• Assumption: The domestic inflation rate (π) is
constant in the long run equilibrium
• Then 𝑅 = 𝑅∗ + 𝜋 − 𝜋 ∗ must also be constant
in the long run equilibrium
– We will now use this constancy of R to get a
theory of long run inflation
Inflation
• We have seen in Chapter 15 that equilibrium
in the money market implies 𝑀 𝑠 = 𝑀𝑑
• Moreover, 𝑀𝑑 = 𝑃 ∙ 𝐿(𝑅, 𝑌)
𝑑
• Simplifying a bit, 𝑀 =
𝑃∙𝐿0 ∙𝑌
𝑅
𝑠
• Therefore, in equilibrium, 𝑀 =
• Therefore, 𝑃 =
𝑀𝑠 ∙𝑅
𝐿0 ∙𝑌
𝑃∙𝐿0 ∙𝑌
𝑅
Inflation
• Therefore, in the long-run, 𝑃 =
𝑀𝑠 ∙𝑅
𝐿0 ∙𝑌
=
𝑀𝑠 ∙𝑅
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓
• We saw three slides back that R is constant in
the long run equilibrium. Moreover, L0 is an
exogenous constant
• Therefore, the faster the money supply (Ms)
grows, the faster the price level (P) will grow
• And, the faster potential GDP (Yf) grows, the
slower the price level (P) will grow
Inflation
• In general, 𝜋 = 𝑀 𝑠𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓𝑔
– Note that this is a solution because it expresses an
endogenous variable, π, entirely in terms of
exogenous variables
• For example, if the Federal Reserve expands
US money supply at the rate of 5% a year and
if the US economy’s potential GDP increases at
the rate of 3% a year, then, in the long run,
the US inflation rate will be 2% a year.
The Interest Rate, again
• So far, we have shown that
– 𝑅 = 𝑅 ∗ + 𝐸𝑔 (interest parity),
– 𝐸𝑔 = 𝜋 − 𝜋 ∗ , and
– 𝜋 = 𝑀 𝑠𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔
• Therefore, the domestic nominal interest rate
in the long run is 𝑅 = 𝑅∗ + 𝑀 𝑠𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓𝑔 − 𝜋 ∗ ,
a constant
– Note that this is a solution because it expresses an
endogenous variable, R, entirely in terms of
exogenous variables
The Price Level
• A few slides back, we saw that in the long run
the domestic price level is 𝑃 =
𝑀𝑠 ∙𝑅
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓
∗
• Moreover, we just saw that 𝑅 = 𝑅 + 𝑀 𝑠𝑔 −
𝑌𝑓𝑔 − 𝜋 ∗
• Therefore, in the long run, the domestic price
level is 𝑃 =
𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓
Appreciation Rate of the Foreign
Currency
• We saw earlier that
– the foreign currency appreciates at the rate 𝐸𝑔 =
𝜋 − 𝜋 ∗ , and
– the inflation rate is 𝜋 = 𝑀 𝑠𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓𝑔 ,
• Therefore, 𝐸𝑔 = 𝑀 𝑠𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓𝑔 − 𝜋 ∗
– Note that this is a solution because it expresses an
endogenous variable, Eg, entirely in terms of
exogenous variables
The Exchange Rate
• Recall that under relative purchasing power
parity, we have 𝑞 =
𝐸=𝑞∙
𝑃
𝑃∗
𝐸∙𝑃∗
𝑃
= 𝑞, which implies
• We have also seen two slides back that 𝑃 =
𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓
• Therefore, 𝐸 =
𝑞∙𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓 ∙𝑃∗
Summary: Long-Run, Flexible Exchange
Rates
• q = 𝑞, relative PPP
• Y = Yf
• 𝜋 = 𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔
• 𝑅 = 𝑅 ∗ + 𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔 − 𝜋 ∗
• 𝑃=
𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
• 𝐸𝑔 =
• 𝐸=
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓
𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔
− 𝜋∗
𝑞∙𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓 ∙𝑃∗
The crucial point to note about
these expressions is that the
variables on the right-hand
sides of these equations are all
exogenous. As exogenous
variables are ‘mystery variables’
about which our theory has
nothing to say, the equations on
this slide say all that our theory
can say about the endogenous
variables on the left-hand sides
of these equations.
Summary: Long-Run, Flexible Exchange
Rates
• q = 𝑞, relative PPP
• Y = Yf
• 𝜋 = 𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔
• 𝑅 = 𝑅 ∗ + 𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔 − 𝜋 ∗
• 𝑃=
𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
• 𝐸𝑔 =
• 𝐸=
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓
𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔
− 𝜋∗
𝑞∙𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓 ∙𝑃∗
Keep in mind that we are
talking about the long run here.
So, these equations show us the
long run effects of permanent
changes in the exogenous
variables on the equations’
right-hand sides.
Summary: Long-Run, Flexible Exchange
Rates
• q = 𝑞, relative PPP
• Y = Yf
• 𝜋
• 𝑅
The first two variables are real
variables: they can be measured even
in barter (or, non-monetary)
𝑠
𝑓
=𝑀 𝑔−𝑌 𝑔
economies. The remaining variables
are nominal variables: they make
∗
𝑠
𝑓
∗
= 𝑅 + 𝑀 𝑔 − 𝑌 𝑔 − 𝜋 sense only on monetary economies.
• 𝑃=
𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
• 𝐸𝑔 =
• 𝐸=
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓
𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔
− 𝜋∗
𝑞∙𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓 ∙𝑃∗
Note that the money supply (Ms) has
no effect on real variables. This is an
instance of monetary neutrality in the
long run.
Summary: Long-Run, Flexible Exchange
Rates
• q = 𝑞, relative PPP
• Y = Yf
Flashback to Ch. 15 of the textbook
(KOM 10e):
• 𝜋 = 𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔
• 𝑅=
• 𝑃=
“A change in the supply of money has
no effect on the long-run values of the
∗
𝑠
𝑓
∗
𝑅 + 𝑀 𝑔 − 𝑌 𝑔 − 𝜋 interest rate or real output.” (p. 395)
𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
𝐿0
∙𝑌 𝑓
• 𝐸𝑔 = 𝑀 𝑠𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓𝑔 − 𝜋 ∗
• 𝐸=
𝑞∙𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓 ∙𝑃∗
“A permanent increase in the money
supply causes a proportional increase
in the price level’s long-run value. In
particular, if the economy is initially at
full employment, a permanent increase
in the money supply eventually will be
followed by a proportional increase in
the price level.” (p. 396)
Summary: Long-Run, Flexible Exchange
Rates
• q = 𝑞, relative PPP
• Y = Yf
Recall that:
1  C
q
• 𝜋 = 𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔
• 𝑅=
• 𝑃=
𝑅∗
𝑔
− 𝑌𝑓
𝑔
−
𝜋∗
𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
• 𝐸𝑔 =
• 𝐸=
+
𝑀𝑠
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓
𝑀 𝑠 𝑔 − 𝑌𝑓 𝑔
− 𝜋∗
𝑞∙𝑀𝑠 ∙ 𝑅 ∗ +𝑀𝑠 𝑔 −𝑌 𝑓 𝑔 −𝜋∗
𝐿0 ∙𝑌 𝑓 ∙𝑃∗
y
 CAm  Y f  C y  CAm  T  C0  I  G  CA0 
CAq
Therefore, the effect of fullemployment output (Yf) on the
foreign currency’s value (E) is
ambiguous.
Why? When full-employment
output increases, both the
numerator and the denominator
of the equation for E increase. So,
the effect on E is indeterminate.
Exercises
• What are long-run effects of expansionary
fiscal policy (G↑ and/or T↓) under flexible
exchange rates?
• What are long-run effects of expansionary
monetary policy (Ms↑) under flexible
exchange rates?
• What are the effects of an increase in R*− π*?
• What are the effects of an increase in P*?
The balance on a country’s current account (CA) is roughly its net exports
What does CA depend on in the long run?
BONUS TOPIC: THE CURRENT
ACCOUNT IN THE LONG RUN
The Current Account: The Long Run
• Recall that the goods market is in equilibrium
when 𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺 + 𝐶𝐴
– Therefore, 𝐶𝐴 = 𝑌 − 𝐶 − 𝐼 − 𝐺
– 𝐶 = 𝐶0 + 𝐶𝑦 ∙ 𝑌 − 𝑇 and 0 < 𝐶𝑦 < 1
– 𝑌 = 𝑌𝑓 in the long run
– C0, Cy, I, G, T, and Yf are exogenous
• So, 𝐶𝐴 = 1 − 𝐶𝑦 ∙ 𝑌𝑓 − 𝐶0 + 𝐶𝑦 ∙ 𝑇 − 𝐼 − 𝐺
The Current Account: The Long Run
• 𝐶𝐴 = 1 − 𝐶𝑦 ∙ 𝑌𝑓 − 𝐶0 + 𝐶𝑦 ∙ 𝑇 − 𝐼 − 𝐺
• As 0 < 𝐶𝑦 < 1, it follows that 1 − 𝐶𝑦 > 0
• It follows that in the long run, CA is
– directly related with and T, and
– inversely related with C0, I and G
Yf
CA
Yf, T
+
C0, I, G
−
• The key things are domestic supply and
demand. When domestic supply increases or
domestic demand decreases, net exports
increases.
The Current Account: The Long Run
• Contractionary fiscal policy or “fiscal
austerity” (T↑ or G↓) is a way to raise a
country’s net exports (CA↑)
• A fall in consumer wealth—caused by,
say, a real estate crash or a stock market
crash—reduces C0 and therefore leads
to an increase in CA!
• Monetary policy has no effect
• Tariffs on imports have no effect!
CA
Yf, T
+
C0, I, G
−
The Long Run and Monetary Neutrality
• The macroeconomic analysis of the long
run is characterized by the concept of
monetary neutrality
• That is, monetary arrangements and
monetary policy have no effect on the
behavior of real variables
• Therefore, the predictions summarized by
the table on this slide are true for both the
flexible exchange rate system of this
chapter and the fixed exchange rate system
of Chapter 18
CA
Yf, T
+
C0, I, G
−