Transcript PPT

Features of Property Co.
Founded in 1996, Property is an independent company.
Property is not a subsidiary of any major company or manufacturer.
Initial Opportunities
In 1996:
1. Digitization
• from paper documents to digital data
2. Internet and Globalization
• Databases from several countries went online.
• We felt digital data investigations and
data mining had become more important.
Our name: Property comes from intellectual property.
We predicted that the property aspect of intellectual property
rights would become the main focus for the next generation,
therefore Property was a natural choice for us.
Property also has another meaning, which is essential aspect.
Our consultation process delivers constant results for technical and
intellectual property management, therefore we become a part of,
or property of, our clients' business.
Consultation with a conscience
of the fundamentals of patent information services
Mission-critical Tasks
1. The investigation and reporting of patents for legal requests
2. Data mining and mapping of patents and technical
documents for economic requests
First query: Search within Company A, then cluster by technical field
Question: Should Company A emphasize tech field X?
Where do the inventors from field Z come from?
New query: Search for inventor group N, observing field Z
The inventors moved from fields X,Y into field Z
New intelligence → Search again = Better results
Basic Services
Legal
・ Pre-application investigation
・ Pre-request for examination investigation
・ Invalidate investigation
・ Infringement evasion investigation
Economic
・ Extracting new technological knowledge
・ Landscaping technological markets at
the time of new entries
Tendencies
・Many investigations are requested when the
client company is developing a new entry.
・Often, the process is completed just barely
within the company's fixed timeframe.
・Most work is challenging, as it demands
speed and precision.
That challenge yielded results.
We were able to:
1. Develop new analysis techniques.
2. Meet and work with energetic, promising
new companies.
Other Tasks
• Development of software, translation services, etc.
- 90%* of services are on-demand services
*This includes patent information services.
• Remaining 10% - Online database proxy sales
- Selling databases fitting the client's investigation only
1) Databases according to country
(e.g. CNIPR-IPPH, PATBRIDGE-WIPS, WEBPAT)
2) International databases according to family
(e.g. QPAT [ORBIT.COM] from Questel)
90%
10%
The Japanese Patent Intelligence Market
A Background
The standard market historically:
Primary market: Product Sales > In-sourcing Demand
Database changes: Text → Detail → Coverage
Secondary market: Consultation services for out-sourcing demand
Foreseeable Future Market
Aspects of Out-sourcing Demand in Japan
The conceptual approach to intellectual property differs from
company to company.
In Company A, the research department conducts research before
filing.
- Filtering for high quality filings.
In Company B, inventors conduct research by themselves before
filing.
- The quality of filing depends on the inventors.
Company A uses an outsourcing service and Company B does not
use the service and requires an education system.
As the concept of dealing with confidential information
differs from company to company, demand varies.
For example:
Department X of Company A cannot outsource within
Company A, where it can maintain strong confidentiality.
Therefore, information cannot be disclosed when
estimating the service plan and fees.
Pros:
- Ability to maintain confidentiality.
- It is possible to develop a unique analysis method.
Cons:
- Difficulty meeting new demands from parent
companies.
- Marginalizing/isolating companies' research needs
from the patent research market as a whole.
Advantages of Analysis Method Development in Japan
Advantage 1
a) Stability
b) Higher volume of detailed patents
Many quality ideas with less complex
processes to apply patent analysis
methods.
Advantage 2
Single language suited to technology analysis
compared to other areas
In Europe, because of multiple languages and multiple systems,
it is hard to hold information uniformity.
Advantage 3
Public disclosure system has been introduced in Japan
suited for technology analysis compared to other areas
In the U.S., because of registration system oriented traditions,
it is hard to cover all the filing information.
In Japan, patent technology maps have been developed
in addition to patent rights maps.
Other Advantages
• Improvement of analysis conditions with
precise and accurate classification
- IPC, FI-term, F-term
• Habit of respecting order and unity
The History of Property Co.
1996 : Established in Japan and started the business focusing on
patent research and patent analyses
1999 : Started to support Questel’s customers in Japan
2000 : Introduced the data mining method that employs SOM
algorithm to patent analysis
2004 : Developed RSS feed technology and similarity searching
system (employing Bayes theorem and preference exchanges)
2007 : Sales agent in Japan for CNIPR of IPPH Company
2008 : Sales agent in Japan for Qpat of Questel
2010 : Sales agent in China for Orbit.com of Questel (本質有限公司)
The Partner of an Online Database
Thank You
Property Co., Ltd.