Transcript Folie 1

Georgetown University
The Efficiency Properties of
Competitive Markets
$/q
$/q
S
MC
ATC
P
D
Firm
P=MC Allocative efficiency
P=minAC Productive efficiency
Industry
Dynamic efficiency (?)
J. Schumpeter’s Theory of
Creative Destruction
Q
Market Failures
 Fill
In – what market failures can you think of?
Natural Monopoly
Contrived monopoly
Public Goods
Externalities
Asymmetric Information
Monopoly:
Profit Maximization
MC
$
ATC
PM PROFIT
ATC
P(Q)
QM
MR
Q
“Antitrust laws in general, and the Sherman Act
in particular, are the Magna Carta of free
enterprise. They are as important to the
preservation of economic freedom and our free
enterprise system as the bill of rights is to the
protection of our fundamental personal
freedoms.”
Thurgood Marshall
Supreme Court Justice
Antitrust effectiveness

Statutes





Origins
Goals
Language
Enforcement Institutions and Agencies
Case Law
Origins of the Antitrust Laws
 Rise
in methods of mass production
 Reduced transportation cost
 Outbreaks of price wars
 Formation of trusts
 Political opposition from consumers,
farmers and political satirists
Goals of Antitrust
 The
goal of antitrust is to ensure that firms
compete to serve the needs of consumers,
… even when vigorous competition is
contrary to the interests of powerful and
entrenched suppliers.


Carl Shapiro
May 2009
Sherman Act (1890)
 Section
1 “Any contract, combination or
conspiracy in restraint of trade ...is hereby
declared illegal.” [akin to Article 81 in EC]
2 “Every person who shall
monopolize or attempt to monopolize
...any part of trade or commerce among
the several states shall be guilty of a
felony.” [akin to article 82 in EC]
 Section
Clayton Act (1914)

Price Discrimination [Sec. 2]


Section 2(a) permits “cost justification defense”
Section 2(b) permits “good faith” meeting of competition

Exclusionary practices [Sec. 3]
 (e.g., exclusive dealing; territorial restrictions; tying)
 Mergers [Sec. 7]
• [Hart-Scott-Rodino (1976)]

That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce
...to ACT ...where the effect ...may be to substantially lessen
competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of
commerce
Federal Trade Commission Act
(1914)
 Section
5(a) (1) Unfair methods of
competition in or affecting commerce, and
unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or
affecting commerce, are hereby declared
unlawful.
Article 81

1. The following shall be prohibited as incompatible with the
common market: all agreements between undertakings, decisions
by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may
affect trade between Member States and which have as their object
or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within
the common market, and in particular those which:

(a) directly or indirectly fix purchase or selling prices or any other
trading conditions;

(b) limit or control production, markets, technical development, or
investment;

(c) share markets or sources of supply;

(d) apply dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other
trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage;

(e) make the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the
other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or
according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject
of such contracts.
Article 82

Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position
within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be
prohibited as incompatible with the common market in so far as it
may affect trade between Member States.

Such abuse may, in particular, consist in:

(a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or
other unfair trading conditions;

(b) limiting production, markets or technical development to the
prejudice of consumers;

(c) applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with
other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive
disadvantage;

(d) making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the
other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or
according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject
of such contracts.
Antitrust Enforcement
 Antitrust
Division of the U.S. Department
of Justice


Sherman Act (criminal cases)
Some Clayton Act
 Federal


Trade Commission
FTC Act
Some Clayton Act
 State Antitrust Agencies
 Private
Enforcement
Antitrust effectiveness
 Clayton Act,
Section 4
“Any person who shall be injured in his
business or property by reason of anything
forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue in
any district court of the United States
...and shall recover threefold the
damages by him sustained, and the cost
of the suit, including a reasonable
attorney‘s fees.”
U.S. Antitrust Exemptions

Labor – Clayton Act (Section 6) “the labor of a human being is not a
commodity or article of commerce”

(e.g., employer unions; NFL scout teams)

Agricultural cooperatives

Patents

The State Action Doctrine

Parker v. Brown (1943)

Noerr-Pennington Doctrine

Eastern Railroad Presidents‘ Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight
(1967)

Trade occuring outside the U.S with foreign nations

Foreign Trade Improvements Act (1982) exempts “trade or
commerce (other than import trade and commerce) with foreign
nations“
Competition Policy in the larger
socio-economic context
 Economic
freedoms
 Protection of small business
 Political ideology
 Antitrust in a distressed industry/economy

Shapiro (2009)
Antitrust in the Current Economy
Percent Change in Real GDP, U.S.
6.0
5.0
percent
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Antitrust in the Current Economy
Single Family Home Sales, U.S.
1,400
1,200
Thousands
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Antitrust in Distressed Industries
 Recent
economic times have led some
(many) pundits to challenged the
fundamental propositions of the beneficial
effects of markets and a more cooperative
model of firm behavior


What has been the historical response to of
policymakers with respect to competition
policy in times of economic downturn?
Did efforts such as the NRA in the Great
Depression help the recovery process?
The likely political push points
 Pressure
on enforcers
 Exemptions
 We are all for competition, but…
 Expansion of failing firm defense (mergers)