Exchange-Rate Targeting Advantages

Download Report

Transcript Exchange-Rate Targeting Advantages

chapter 20
Monetary Policy Strategy: The
International Experience
Role of a Nominal Anchor
Ties Down  Expectations
Helps Avoid Time-Inconsistency Problem
1. Arises from pursuit of short-term goals which lead to
bad long-term outcomes
2. Time-inconsistency resides more in political process
3. Nominal anchor limits political pressure for timeinconsistency
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 2
Exchange-Rate Targeting
Advantages
1. Fixes  for internationally traded goods
2. Anchors  expectations
3. Automatic rule, avoids time-inconsistency
4. Easy to understand: “sound currency” as rallying cry
5. Helps economic integration
6. Successful in reducing 
France, UK, Mexico
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 3
Exchange-Rate Targeting
Disadvantages
1. Loss of independent monetary policy
Problems after German reunification: UK, French
monetary policy too tight
2. Open to speculative attacks
Europe, Sept. 1992; Mexico: 1994; Asia: 1997
3. Successful speculative attack disastrous for emerging
market countries because it leads to financial crisis
4. Weakened accountability: lose exchange-rate signal
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 4
Currency Boards vs. Dollarization
Currency Boards
1. Domestic currency exchanged at fixed rate for foreign
currency automatically
2. Fixed exchange rate with very strong commitment
mechanism and no discretion
3. Usual disadvantages of fixed exchange rate
4. Still subject to speculative attack
5. Lose ability to have lender of last resort
Dollorization
1. Even stronger commitment mechanism
2. No possibility of speculative attack
3. Usual disadvantages of fixed exchange rtae
4. Lose seignorage
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 5
Summary:
Advantages
and
Disadvantages
of Different
Monetary
Policy
Strategies
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 6
Summary:
Advantages
and
Disadvantages
of Different
Monetary
Policy
Strategies
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 7
Monetary Targeting
Canada
1. Targets M1 till 1982, then abandons it
2. 1988: declining  targets, M2 as guide
United Kingdom
1. Targets M3 and later M0
2. Problems of M as monetary indicator
Japan
1. Forecasts M2 + CDs
2. Innovation and deregulation makes less useful as monetary indicator
3. High money growth 1987-1989: “bubble economy,” then tight money
policy
Germany and Switzerland
1. Not monetarist rigid rule
2. Targets using M0 and M3: changes over time
3. Allows growth outside target for 2-3 years, but them reverses overshoots
4. Key elements: flexibility, transparency, and accountability
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 8
Monetary Targeting
Advantages
1. Able to cope with domestic considerations
2. Signals are immediate
3. Immediate accountability of central bank
Disadvantages
1. Big if: all advantages require reliable relationship
between goal and targeted aggregate
2. In many countries, weak relationship between goal and
M-aggregate
Poor communications device and accountability
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 9
Inflation Targeting
Five Elements
1. Public announcement of medium-term š-target
2. Institutional commitment to price stability
3. Information inclusive strategy
4. Increased transparency through public communication
5. Increased accountability
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 10
Inflation
Targeting
in New
Zealand,
Canada,
and the
UK
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 11
Inflation Targeting
Advantages
1. Allows focus on domestic considerations
2. Not dependent on reliable relationship between
M-aggregate and inflation
3. Readily understood by public
4. Reduce political pressures for time-inconsistent policy
5. Focus on transparency and communication
6. Increased accountability of central bank
7. Performance good:  and  e  , and stays low in
business cycle upturn
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 12
Inflation Targeting
Disadvantages
1. Delayed signalling
2. Too much rigidity
3. Potential for increased output fluctuations
4. Low economic growth
Nominal GDP Targeting
1. Close to inflation targeting with concern about output
fluctuations
2. Problem of announcing specific target for real GDP
growth
3. Harder for public to understand
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 13
Monetary Policy with an Implicit
Nominal Anchor
Forward-Looking and Preemptive to Deal With
Long Lags
Advantages
1. Focus on domestic considerations
2. Has worked very well in the U.S.
3. If It Ain’t Broke Why Fix It
Disadvantages
1. Lack of transparency and accountability
2. Dependence on personalities
3. Inconsistent with democratic principles
Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley Longman
TM 20- 14