Transcript Document

Housing Supply, Demand
and Affordability:
An Overview of Current Trends and their
Implications
Professor Ian Cole
Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research
Sheffield Hallam University
Outline






The challenge for national housing policy
Different ways of tackling housing shortage
'Affordability' 'need' and demand'
The changing profile of housing tenure
Housing demand and supply in the region
Implications for the Leeds city region
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
The dilemma of housing policy
Factors making for
inertia
Housing as long term
asset
Spatially fixed
Factors making for
change
Household composition
High cost
Changing aspirations
The weight of history
Economic opportunities
Migration patterns
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
Sounds familiar?






Two and a half years of a Conservative-led
government following a period of Labour
dominance
Housing shortages grow as building rates fail to
keep pace with household formation rates
Difficulties in gaining access to mortgage finance
Increasing pressure on social housing
Hopes placed in revival of PRS
Market principles advocated when market at its
most fragile
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
The challenge.....

So, what could be done...?

in 1954?
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
National housing policy in 1954






govt. maintained large scale council house building
to meet targets (224k completed in 1954 cf 90k
private)
building programme geographically spread in GB
reduction in standard of materials, design and
property diversity in LA sector to achieve quantity
relaxation of rent controls in the PRS designed to
stimulate the sector
reintroduction of slum clearance
imminent move away (in 1956) from property-based
to person-based subsidy: start of rebates
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
The rationale for national policy in 1954




a pragmatic, and time limited, embrace of the state
as the only means of addressing a national
emergency
but public housing would never attain the primacy
of NHS or state education
always hedged with stigma: eg 'spiv' replaced by
the 'Jaguar owning council tenant'...
and much relied on local innovation not national
government dictat
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
Local Innovation







'hidden histories' not captured by national narrative
eg Urmston Housebuilders Association in
Manchester
Self-build association of 28 households
30 hours minimum a week commitment to build 2
schemes: 16 houses and 12 bungalows
Council provided cheap land, guaranteed 5 per cent
fixed rate mortgages over 20 years (£2 per week)
£30 down payment as deposit
customised design of kitchens and bathrooms
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
The outcome






price of new houses: £1,300 for 3 br semi-detached
properties
average price of new houses in England in 1954
(Q1) was £2,100
priority determined not by a points scheme...but by
drawing lots
strong community ethos prevailed
the Big Society in action -before it was invented?
but not everyone was happy about it....
CWAG Conference
Leeds 28 September 2012
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
The lessons of 1954?





you cannot rely on private sector to meet policy targets in
difficult market conditions
the planned revival of the PRS may bring with it unanticipated
outcomes
affordability is a question of land values and development
costs as much as household income and subsidy
the growth of home ownership requires sustained economic
growth across the income spectrum
the best 'solutions' are locally created, not nationally
mandated....
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
and now?
WE NEED TO BUILD!
but how...?
the market-based response: relieve planning restrictions
through s106 revisions and presumption in favour of
development
the
mixed economy response: target public investment to
promote 'leverage' with private sector in the lead
the
state-based response: national emergencies require firm
government action, if only for a limited time
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
A market- based approach
remove
or reduce planning restrictions
 give developers far more options for sites
 encourage larger sites
 but how does this fit with targets....?
'If we are to plan we must have plannable instruments and the
speculative builder, by his very nature , is not a plannable
instrument'
Aneurin Bevan 1947
and how much encouragement do developers
need?

WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
Recession? What Recession?





Barratts: profit increase of 159%: from £42.7m (2011) to
£191.1m (2012) Revenue up 14.1 % and margins increased
from 6.6 to 8.2%
Cala Group: increase in operating profit of 96% (2012)
and revenue up 18%
Redrow: increase in operating profit of 55% (2012) and
revenue up by 6%
Galliford Try: increase in profit before tax of 80% (2012)
and revenue up by 17%
LGA: 400,000 planning permissions currently outstanding
in E and Wales
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
A mixed economy approach ?




public sector role can target development more
effectively, but 'leverage' assumptions are often
overblown
will struggle to address geographical imbalances,
brinkmanship over planning constraints and in-bred risk
aversion
may insulate the development industry still further
without gain in output
should infrastructure development remain the primary
domain of the public sector, and not a site for
profitability? (Hildyard and Heseltine)
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
A state-led approach?





Tullet Prebon: Building a Road to Recovery? August 2012
State can invest in housebuilding without sucking in
imports. In the long-term, it will be self-financing
(increase growth and revenue and reduce HB)
'We would stress that this investment should be
undertaken by local authorities or housing associations,
not through public-private gimmicks like PFI'
'The government and social sectors should act as owners
and commissioners of new housing'.
'A national housebuilding programme should be a
national economic imperative, not thwarted by sectoral
self-interest or ideology'
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
Putting Policies to Boost Housing Supply to
the Test
Questions
 are developers straining at the leash to build?
 is land supply the problem ?
 where are the 'new' home owners?
 can leverage fill the 'production gap'?
 is there any public, let alone government, support for a
stronger state role?
 ....and can it be afforded anyway? what spending is
sacrificed elsewhere?
 what evidence is there of a shortage anyway?
 how much new housing needs to be 'affordable'
 and what does that mean anyway?
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
But who will build?
spec
developers are quick to take fright
build for rent vehicles will be concerned about churn and
limited security of tenure
housing associations may find it difficult to borrow when full
welfare reform measures are implemented
and councils now have the freedom to build - but symbolic
rather than substantial in most areas
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
Demand, Need and Affordability







need to focus on 'effective' demand
risk aversion to lending will be very slow to clear
housing 'need' - now a redundant term?
be wary of any household projections!: patterns are
culturally and financially shaped, as well as statistically
determined
defining 'affordability' and 'affordable housing': not clearcut
Affordable Housing Programme 80% of market rent arbitrary but convenient ?
implications for HB spending?
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
What about tenure location and type?







home ownership - the end of the affair?
blurring of private and social (HA) distinction in renting
sharper contrast between market and welfare sectors in
PRS
opportunities in the PRS left vacant by students
assumed growth of REITs may be over optimistic
pressure on HMOs and hostels
increased 'sifting' in residential markets
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
Moving to a more European model ?







beginnings of a corporate rented sector?
later entry into home ownership
wider acceptance of shared ownership
flexible tenure
better integrated HA sector: rationalisation is overdue
residue of public welfare housing for transient and
displaced groups
....but what about the Y and H region?
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
Regional Public Enquiry 2009

housing market will not return to pre-recession state until
2013...14 ...or 15?
Barriers to growth




lack of finance for development and s106 constraints
need a new model not dependent on ever increasing land values
(HBF)
lack of finance for purchasers: over-reaction by lenders
land...? (no consensus)
Where to build?


Selby district as prime location for 'deflected growth' ?
Keep away from the 'golden triangle'
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
The Leeds sub-region

At 2009 Public Enquiry

argument over housing supply in Leeds city
CC said developable land not in short supply
developers: being forced to use unattractive parcels of
land...'quality homes in quality sites will always sell'



and now

scramble for growth (when it comes) and Leeds has high
commuting in-flows at present
city centre apartment market will not expand
regeneration of more deprived areas unlikely for medium term
welcome to north east Leeds and the A65 corridor as favoured
sites !



WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
Some Questions and Issues






What does 'muscular localism' really mean?
Will new residential development ruin integrity/identity of
places?
Is there lower grade 'green' elsewhere that might attract
developers?
Will mixed communities be close to mixed employment
opportunities?
Can the transport and other infrastructure sustain it?
One thing's certain....
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012

self-build housing will not be enough to save
the day...
WARD Networking Meeting
Rawdon 24 November 2012
Housing Supply, Demand
and Affordability:
An Overview of Current Trends and their
Implications
Professor Ian Cole
Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research
Sheffield Hallam University