Transcript Lecture 12

L11200 Introduction to Macroeconomics 2009/10
Lecture 12:
The Equilibrium Business Cycle Model
Reading: Barro Ch.8
18 February 2010
Introduction
• Last time:
– Completed the macroeconomic model by
analysing how consumption impacted investment
• Today
– Begin to apply the model by studying the
fluctuations in output more closely
– Test whether the model fits the data
‘Equilibrium Business Cycle’
• The model we have constructed is known as
an ‘Equilibrium Business Cycle Model’
– ‘Equilibrium’ because markets are continually in
equilibrium
– ‘Business Cycle’ because it seeks to explain the
cycle of fluctuations known by this name
• Aims to explain economic fluctuations
Fluctuations
• There are clearly fluctuations, but how do we
measure them?
– GDP is trended upwards, but deviates around that
trend
– Can estimate trend and deviation using filtering
techniques
– Classify ‘recessions’ as periods of growth which
are significantly lower than trend growth
Testing the Model
• Fluctuations in technology:
– Part one of the course established that growth in
A is the best explanator of long-run economic
growth
– Idea here: fluctuations in A are best explanator of
fluctuations in growth
– So positive and negative shocks to technology
drive short-term expansions and contractions
Testing the Model
• Test this idea with the following questions
– If fluctuations in output are caused by fluctuations
in technology, what does that imply for
fluctuations in wages, rents, consumption,
investment, unemployment, capital utilisation?
– Does the data conform with the predictions of the
model?
Technology Shocks
• Our production function is subject to shocks in
A
Y  A F ( K , L)
– Positive shock to A means that for a given K,L
output increases (so MPL and MPK increase)
– Negative shock to A means that for a given K,L
output decreases (so MPL and MPK decrease)
Implications:
• Increase in technology level
– Raises demand for labour, with inelastic supply
this causes increase in real wage w/P
– Raises demand for capital, with inelastic supply
this causes increase in rental cost R/P
– Increase in rental cost means i also increases
i  R / P 
Implications for Consumption
• Interest rate i increases
– Intertemporal substitution effect encourages
households to save, consumption should fall
– But if A is permanent, large positive income effect
encourages consumption to increase
– So net effect is increase in consumption when
technology shock hits
Predictions
• So, if technology is driving output fluctuations
– Wages should rise when output rises and fall
when output falls
– Interest rates should rise when output rises and
fall when output falls
– Consumption and Investment should both rise
when output rises and fall when output falls
– That is, all of these variables should be procyclical
(instead of counter-cyclical)
Outcome
• Is the data consistent with a model in which
permanent changes to A drive output
– Wages a procyclical (as predicted)
– Rental cost is procyclical (as predicted)
– Consumption is procyclical (as predicted) and less
variable than GDP
– Investment is procyclical (as predicted) and more
variable than GDP
– How to explain the last two patterns?
Summary
• Began testing model of fluctuations on data
– Permanent changes in A imply a particular pattern
for key variables
– This pattern appears evident in the data: supports
the model
• Next time: no longer assume L and K are fixed
– Wages are procyclical – but so is employment (i.e.
L is not fixed!) how do we explain this?