Zambia - PH-EITI

Download Report

Transcript Zambia - PH-EITI

EITI Innovations
18 January 2013
PH-EITI National Workshop
Manila, Philippines
EITI Requirement 9(h)
“Multi-stakeholder groups are encouraged to
explore opportunities to include additional
information in their EITI Reports that will
increase the comprehensiveness of EITI
reporting and public understanding of
revenues and encourage high standards of
transparency and accountability in public life,
government operations and in business.”
EITI Rules, 2011 Edition
EITI in the value chain
Deciding to extract
Getting a
good deal
Ensuring
revenue
transparency
Managing
Volatile
resources
Investing in
sustainable
development
Innovative elements in EITI reports
1. Getting a Good Deal

•
•

State participation in companies
In-kind revenues
Company-by-company production data
Lists of licenses and license holders
2. Ensuring Revenue Transparency



•
Relevant background information
Data from independent sources
Midstream revenues
Spot checks and verification
3. Managing Volatile Resources
 Sub-national reporting
• Front-line revenue allocations
 Revenues allocated to development funds
4. Investing for Sustainable
Development
• Information on revenue use
 Social payments
5. Other innovations
•
•
•
•
Coverage of unique sectors
Reporting templates
Company and government contacts
Evaluates participation
1. Getting a good deal
Policy challenges/questions addressed:
• What is the relationship between the state and
individual oil and mining companies?
• Is the government getting a fair share of
extractive industry revenues?
• What percentage of total production do
government revenues represent?
State participation in companies
• In-kind revenues
• Company-by-company production data
 Lists of licenses and license holders
 State participation in companies
1.1
Cameroon, DRC, Gabon, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mauritania, Mongolia,
Mozambique, Nigeria, Norway, Republic of Congo, Tanzania, Togo, and Zambia
report revenues the state earns as a partner or shareholder in extractive
companies and explain the relationships between companies and the state
State as
State as public entity
shareholder
DRC 2008-09
In-kind revenues
Cote d’Ivoire, Iraq, Nigeria, and Yemen
report the volume and value of physical
flows
.
Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Mozambique, and
Republic of Congo report only the volume
of physical flows
Nigeria 2006-08
Iraq 2009
1.5
1.4
Company-by-company production data
Burkina Faso, Iraq, Mali,
Mozambique, Republic of Congo,
Togo, and Zambia include
company-by-company production
volumes
Mali 2009
Burkina Faso 2008-09
 Lists of licenses and license holders
Gabon 2006-08
Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Republic of Congo,
Tanzania, Timor Leste, Togo, and Zambia list production
sites and who operates them
Gabon and Yemen provide maps of mining and oil
concessions
Cote d’Ivoire 2006-07
Rep. of Congo 2009
1.3
2. Ensuring revenue transparency
Policy challenges/questions addressed:
• How important are extractive revenues to the national
economy?
• How much does the government make from other
industries associated with petroleum and mineral
extraction?
• How accurate is company and government data?
Relevant background information
Data from independent sources
Midstream revenues
• Spot checks and verification
2.1
 Relevant background information
.
Albania
Burkina Faso
CAR
Cote d'Ivoire
DRC
Gabon
Iraq
Kyrgyzstan
Mauritania
Mongolia
Mozambique
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Peru
Rep. of Congo
Sierra Leone
Tanzania
Togo
Timor Leste
Describes all
major
commodites
EI revenues'
role in
national
economy (% of
GDP, exports, Data on
etc.)
reserves
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Describes
growth of
sectors
Current
national
Future
production production
data
estimates
Information on
individual
Describes
projects, major
investment in mines/oilfields,
sectors
etc.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Description of Describes Includes maps
privatisation of role of
of deposits,
EI sectors
SOE
licenses, etc
x
x
Compares
current data
to past EITI
reports
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
References
legislation
covering
extractive
sectors
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Describes
phases and
modes of
exploitation
(exploration
vs. extraction,
large-scale vs.
artisanal, etc.)
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
 Relevant background information
.
Burkina Faso, Gabon, Iraq, Mauritania, Mongolia, Mozambique,
Niger, Republic of Congo, Tanzania, Yemen, and Zambia include
extensive background information on their extractive industry
sectors.
Gabon
2.1
 Data from independent sources
Norway links to state accounts
Sierra Leone cites government
and IMF data
Timor Leste includes Petroleum
Fund reporting
Zambia’s 2008 report includes
production data from the national
statistics office and price data
from the London Metal Exchange
Norway
2.2
 Midstream revenues
2.3
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone includes revenues from port operations and
gold and diamond dealers/exporters
Madagascar includes fees for use of transport
infrastructure among its revenue streams (though no
payments were received)
Togo included payments from the national rail company,
some of which come from transporting minerals
Sierra Leone 2006-07
Spot checks and verification
Ghana cross-checks company claims
Peru verifies sub-national disbursements
Nigeria requires spot checks of physical flows and pricing mechanisms
Ghana 2009
.
Nigeria 1999-2004
2.5
3. Managing volatile resources
Policy challenges/questions addressed:
•Where do extractive revenues go once they’ve been
received by the government?
• What portion of extractive revenues does the
government invest in the future?
Sub-national reporting
• Front-line revenue allocations
Revenues allocated to development funds
 Sub-national reporting
Ghana, Mongolia, Nigeria, Peru, and Sierra Leone include data on
revenue transfers between central and local governments
Peru 2008-10
3.1
3.2
Front-line revenue allocations
Cameroon reports on transfers made to ministries and
public administration before funds go through budget
Cote d’Ivoire’s in-kind gas payments to SOE are used
for electricity generation
Mongolia shows how some revenue streams go to regional budgets
and company “donations” fund specific projects
Timor Leste’s revenues go directly to the Petroleum Fund
Nigeria reports that a portion of in-kind revenues is used to
cover
operating expenses of companies where the state is a shareholder
Kyrgyzstan notes that allocations to the Social Fund and other social
expenditures do not go through the state budget
Kazakhstan’s dividends do not go to state budget
Peru reports that a portion of taxes and royalties go directly to regional
governments
Tanzania includes levies that go directly to local governments
Examples of
front-line
allocations
Oil/Mining
Revenues
In-kind oil/gas goes
directly to refinery
Company-funded
infrastructure projects
Funds go directly to
local governments
SOE dividends are
reinvested
Treasury/
National
Budget
3.3
 Revenues allocated to development funds
Ghana, Iraq, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Nigeria, Peru, Sierra Leone,
and Timor Leste report payments to development funds
Timor Leste 2009
Kyrgyzstan 2009
4. Investing for sustainable development
Policy challenges/questions addressed:
• Is the government using mining and petroleum funds to
accomplish its development priorities?
• Are extractive revenues really benefitting local
communities?
• Are companies following through on promises of
community development?
• Information on revenue use
Social payments
Information on revenue use
Ghana shows budgeted and actual spending by local governments
Peru shows the beneficiaries of specific revenue streams
Ghana 2009
4.1
4.2
 Social payments
Burkina Faso (“Prélèvement Communautaire de Solidarité”),
Kazakhstan (“environmental fees”),
Kyrgyzstan (“environmental charges” and social fund contributions)
Liberia (“contributions to community”),
Mongolia (“donations”),
Peru (payments to local communities),
Republic of Congo (“projets sociaux”),
Togo (voluntary company payments),
Yemen (“social development bonus”), and
Zambia (“environmental protection fund” and “social payments”) report social
payments.
Mongolia 2009
Zambia 2008
5. Other innovations
Policy challenges/questions addressed:
• Which natural resource sectors contribute most to
government revenues?
• Where can civil society activists and journalists go to
follow up on questions raised by EITI reports?
• Which companies and government agencies were
most willing to participate in EITI reporting?
•
•
•
•
Coverage of unique sectors
Reporting templates
Company and government contacts
Evaluates participation
5.1
Coverage of unique sectors
In addition to mining and petroleum revenues
Liberia includes forestry and agriculture
Togo includes the mineral water sector
Liberia 2010
Togo 2010
5.2
Reporting templates
Burkina Faso, Ghana, Peru, Mali, Norway, Republic of Congo,
Tanzania, and Zambia include copies of reporting templates in their EITI reports
Ghana 2009
Tanzania 2008-09
Company and government contacts
Burkina Faso, Madagascar, Mali, Mongolia, Republic of Congo, Sierra Leone,
Tanzania, and Zambia list contacts in companies and government agencies
Mongolia 2009
Rep. of Congo 2010
5.3
Evaluates participation
Mongolia rates performance and
transparency
Republic of Congo’s 2007-09 report shows
which pieces of information each company
supplied
Mongolia 2009
5.4
Wrap-up
Thank you!
Questions?
Erica Westenberg
[email protected]
5.4