Transcript Presentation - European Commission

7th Progress Report:
The regional and urban
dimension of Europe 2020
Lewis Dijkstra
Deputy Head of the Analysis Unit
DG for Regional Policy
European Commission
1
Main points
Smart Growth
1.
2.
3.
4.
Education
Innovation
Digital Society
Smart cities
Sustainable Growth
1. Resource efficient
regions
2. Sustainable cities
Inclusive growth
1. Employment
2. Poverty and exclusion
3. Inclusive cities
10 Factsheets
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Tertiary education
Early-school leavers
R&D as % of GDP
Patent inventors per inhabitants
Change in GHG emissions
outside the Emissions Trading
Scheme
6. Consumption of renewable
energy
7. Employment rate
8. Unemployment rate
9. At-risk-of-poverty or exclusion
10. GDP per head
2
Smart Growth
In regions and cities
3
Source: EUROSTAT
35
United Kingdom
Ireland
France
Belgium
Cyprus
Poland
Spain
Sweden
-----
Netherlands
2020 Target
Finland
65
Germany
Slovakia
Slovenia
Portugal
Tertiary educational attainment 2010
Luxembourg
Lithuania
Estonia
Denmark
Austria
Bulgaria
Latvia
Malta
Greece
Czech Republic
Hungary
Romania
Italy
EU-27
share of the population aged 30-34 years
National rates and 2020 targets
Tertiary educational attainment age group 30-34 in 2010 and
Europe 2020 targets
70
Distance to target
60
55
50
45
40
No
national
target
30
25
20
15
10
4
Tertiary education
5
Source: EUROSTAT
20
United Kingdom
Malta
Italy
Spain
Latvia
Romania
Bulgaria
Sweden
Portugal
Hungary
-----
Luxembourg
Cyprus
2020 Target
Germany
Denmark
Greece
Austria
Early school leavers 2010
France
Estonia
Belgium
Lithuania
Finland
Netherlands
Ireland
Slovakia
Czech Republic
Slovenia
Poland
EU-27
Percentage of the population aged 18-24
National rates and 2020 targets
Early leavers from education and training in 2010 and Europe 2020
targets
40
Distance to target
35
30
25
No
national
target
15
10
5
0
6
Early school leavers
7
National rates and targets 2020
Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) in 2010 and Europe
2020 targets
5
Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD)
2020 Target
----- Distance to target
4
% of GDP
3
No national target
2
1
Source: EUROSTAT
United Kingdom
Czech Republic
Sweden
Finland
Austria
Slovenia
Portugal
France
Spain
Estonia
Germany
Denmark
Belgium
EU-27
Netherlands
Luxembourg
Romania
Ireland
Lithuania
Hungary
Poland
Italy
Latvia
Bulgaria
Slovakia
Malta
Cyprus
0
8
R&D
9
Digital society
•
•
•
•
Use of public e-Services by residents and firms
People ordering products and services online
High growth of online turnover
High speed internet access: Available
everywhere?
• Next Generation Access likely to start in cities
10
Patents
Patent applications to the EPO, average 2006-2007
100,000
Capital metro region
Second tier metro region
Patent applications per ten million inhabitants, logarithmic scale
Smaller metro region
Non-metro regions combined
FI
National
10,000
DK AT
BE
SI
1,000
HU
CZ
EE
PT
MT
GR
SK
100
BG
RO
IE
IT
UK
SE
NL
DE
FR
ES
LV
LT
PL
10
1
11
Urban productivity
Labour productivity in Metro regions and their MS, 2008
221
209
160
Capital metro region
IE
BE
Second tier metro region
Smaller metro region
140
SE
Non-metro regions combined
Labour productiviti in PPS 2008, EU-27 index=100
national
NL
EL
120
SK
RO
HU
100
AT
FI
DK
ES
DE
UK
FR
IT
SI
CZPT
LT
EE
80
BG
LV
PL
60
40
20
0
12
Big gaps in the east
Labour productivity in PPS in metro regions compared to the rest of their
country, 2008
280
Capital metro region
RO
Labour productivity in PPS, non-metro regions combined =100
Second tier metro region
Smaller metro region
Non-metro regions combined
240
200
BG
LV
EE
LT
CZ
HU
160
SK
PL
120
SI
SEAT
EL
DK
IE
BE
FI
ES
DE
NL
UK
FR
IT
80
40
0
13
Cities and tertiary educated
High education attainment rate 25-64 by type of area, 2009
Share of high education attainment of people aged 25-64 in %
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
Urban areas
5
Towns, suburbs and rural areas
0
EU
FI
SE DK EE LT
IE
LU CY NL ES FR BE
SI BG LV UK HU PL EL DE SK AT RO CZ PT
IT
MT
14
Sustainable Growth
In regions and cities
15
Effort sharing decision
Change in greenhouse gas emissions outside the Emmissions Trading
Scheme, 2005-2009 and Europe 2020 targets
30
% change 2005-2009
-----
2020 Target
Distance to target
25
Target already reached
20
Changes with respect to 2005 levels, %
20
19
Reduced the distance but not yet reached their target
17
15
Target not reached
15
13
14
11
10
10
9
5
5
1
4
0
-5
-5
-4
-10
-10
-10
-15
-17
-20
-20
-20
-16
-16
-16
-16
-15
-14
-14
-13
-20
Target = Reduction in emissions
Target = Limit increase in emissions
BG
RO
LV
LT
PL
SK
EE
HU
CZ
MT
SI
PT
EL
CY
ES
IT
FR
DE
BE
EU-27
Source: EEA, provisional calculation method
UK
NL
FI
AT
SE
LU
IE
DK
-25
16
Renewable Energy
Share of renewable energy relative to total energy consumption in %
Renewable energy consumption, 2006, 2008 and the 2020 targets
50
2006
45
2008
40
2020 Target
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
SE
LV
FI
AT
PT
DK
EE
SI
RO
FR
LT
ES
DE
EL
IT
BG
IE
PL
UK
NL
SK
BE
CY
CZ
HU
LU
MT
EU27
17
Urban eco-efficiency
People who do not have a car, 2010
% population without a car for financial and other reasons %
60
Large urban areas
50
Rural areas, towns and suburbs
40
30
20
10
0
EU27
CY
MT
LU
SI
IT
NL
FR
ES
UK
BE
IE
EL
PT
DE
LT
AT
FI
SE
CZ
BG
SK
DK
PL
EE
HU
LV
RO
Source: Eurostat SILC, MS ranked by share in large urban areas. Areas are defined by degree of urbanisation
18
Urban eco-efficiency
• In cities residents and workers tend to
–
–
–
–
travel shorter distances
use the car less
live in houses/flats which are smaller
Work in buildings that share walls with other
buildings
• District heating is more efficient
• However policies to make cities even more
efficient should not push jobs and residents to
the outskirts of a city
19
Inclusive growth
In regions and cities
20
Source: EUROSTAT
United Kingdom
70
Sweden
Netherlands
Denmark
Finland
Austria
Germany
Cyprus
Estonia
Bulgaria
Slovenia
-----
Portugal
2020 Target
Hungary
France
Czech Republic
Spain
Belgium
Employment rate 2010
Luxembourg
Latvia
Lithuania
Slovakia
Poland
Romania
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Malta
EU-27
% of total population - age group 20-64
National rates and 2020 targets
Employment rate in 2010 and Europe 2020 targets
85
Distance to target
80
75
No national
target
65
60
55
21
Employment: Northwest vs. the rest
22
Source: EUROSTAT
Ireland
Cyprus
United Kingdom
Luxembourg
Sweden
Romania
Bulgaria
Latvia
Lithuania
Hungary
2020 Target
Poland
Greece
Portugal
Spain
People at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion 2010
Italy
EU27
Malta
Germany
Denmark
Slovakia
Belgium
Estonia
France
Slovenia
Netherlands
Czech Republic
Finland
Austria
share of the population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion
National targets and 2020 rates
People at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion in 2010 and Europe
2020 targets
50
45
----- Distance to target
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
No national target
0
23
At risk of poverty and exclusion:
South and East
24
Unemployment: impact of the crisis
25
East West Divide on low work
People living in a household with low work intensity, 2009
20%
Large urban areas
Rural areas, towns and suburbs
Share of population with a low work intensity, %
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
Urban disadvantage
Urban advantage
0%
EU
BE UK DK AT MT NL DE FR
SI
LU EL
IT
SE PT CZ
FI
ES CY PL LV EE RO SK BG IE
Source: Eurostat SILC, MS ranked by difference between large urban areas and other areas. Areas are defined by degree of urbanisation
LT HU
26
East West divide on urban poverty
People at risk of poverty, 2009
35
Large urban areas
Rural areas, towns and suburbs
Share of population at risk of poverty in %
30
Urban disadvantage
Urban advantage
25
20
15
10
5
0
EU
LU MT UK AT BE DE DK EL SE NL CZ
SI
FR CY
IT
ES EE SK
IE HU
FI
Source: Eurostat SILC, MS ranked by difference between large urban areas and other areas. Areas are defined by degree of urbanisation
PT LV PL LT BG RO
27
Deprivation in the East
Severe material deprivation, 2009
50
Share of population with severe material deprivation in %
45
Large urban areas
Rural areas, towns and suburbs
40
35
30
Urban disadvantage
Urban advantage
25
20
15
10
5
0
EU
BE AT
IE
PT FR UK MT DE SE NL EL
IT
LU DK ES
FI
CY CZ
SI
LV EE PL
LT SK HU RO BG
Source: Eurostat SILC, MS ranked by difference between large urban areas and other areas. Areas are defined by degree of urbanisation
28
Overall: mixed picture
People at risk of poverty or exclusion, 2009
Share of population at risk of poverty or exclusion in %
60
Large urban areas
Rural areas, towns and suburbs
50
40
30
20
10
Urban disadvantage
Urban advantage
0
EU
LU MT AT UK BE DE DK FR NL SE CZ CY
SI
IT
FI
EL
IE
EE LV SK PT ES HU PL LT BG RO
Source: Eurostat SILC, MS ranked by difference between large urban areas and other areas. Areas are defined by degree of urbanisation
29
GDP per head growth
30
Conclusion
• Europe 2020 is an ambitious strategy
• Requires a different policy mix in countries
(National Reform Programmes)
• Requires a different policy mix in regions
(Cohesion Policy Programmes)
• Urban needs differ substantially between
countries and cities. Urban deprivation more
concentrated in EU-15
• Urban opportunities in all MS, but investment
needed to remove obstacles to development
31
Thank you for your attention
Questions?
32