Crystallographic studies of two bacterial antibiotic

Download Report

Transcript Crystallographic studies of two bacterial antibiotic

X-ray crystallographic studies of
two bacterial antibiotic resistance
enzymes: Aminoglycoside
Phosphotransferase (2’’)-Ic and
GES-1 β-lactamase
Laura Byrnes
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
August 15th, 2007
Background



Antibiotic resistance has been around
for eons
Widespread use, poor patient
compliance have pushed along
resistance
Structures of antibiotic resistance
enzymes contain valuable information
for getting around resistance
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
2
Why bother?

Reaction mechanisms much clearer




Hydrogen bonds
Hydrogen atoms (at ultra-high resolution)
Illustrate and characterize proteinsubstrate interactions
Structure-based drug discovery
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
3
Goals

Characterize interactions between
GES-1 and inhibitor complex,
imipenem

Solve the structure of APH(2’’)-Ic
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
4
Enzymatic Action

GES-1

a β-lactamase
Penicillin

APH(2’’)-Ic

July 20, 2015
an aminoglycoside
phosphotransferase
Laura Byrnes SULI
Gentamicin
5
What do we need?
X-rays!
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
6
Why crystals and X-rays?




Molecules arranged in a regular, repeating
pattern in crystals
Electrons in the molecules bend an incident
X-ray beam into thousands of diffracted
beams
Multiple copies of the same molecule in the
same orientation amplify the diffraction
peaks
The diffraction pattern contains all of the
information necessary to determine the
structure!
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
7
Different crystallization
methods

Vapor Diffusion



Hanging drop
Sitting drop
Dialysis
We used the hanging drop method to grow
the APH(2’’)-Ic crystals used to collect data
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
8
The Protein Crystal Cookbook


You wish!
What can we do… ?
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
9
What’s Next?

Vary conditions







July 20, 2015
Salt/metal ions (trace)
Precipitant (e.g. PEG -- polyethylene glycol,
alcohols, high salt concentration)
pH
Buffer types
Temperature
Protein concentration
Organic compounds (trace)
Laura Byrnes SULI
10
Obstacles


July 20, 2015
Protein showers
Salty!
Some proteins just won’t crystallize
Unique problems; APH(2’’)-Ic crystals
grow as flat sheets
Laura Byrnes SULI
11
Tools of the Trade
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
12
So you think you have
crystals?



Crystals mounted
on a nylon fiber
loop (~200μm)
Keep it cold!
Cryoprotectant

July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
Our crystals were
grown in 20% PEG
13
Leave it to the robot…
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
14
X-ray Diffraction, in a Nutshell
Bragg’s Law:
July 20, 2015
n  2 * d sin 
Laura Byrnes SULI
15
The Reciprocal Lattice
1
1
a* 

d (100) a
1
1
b* 

d (010) b
1
1
c* 

d (001) c
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
16
Ewald Sphere
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
17
What does it all add up to?
Water lines
Diffraction
pattern
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
18
Molecular Replacement

Use a related protein as a structural model

We used APH(2’’)-Ib

Doesn’t always work out

Other options:
Multiple isomorphous replacement




Soak crystals in heavy metal solutions
Modify substrates or cofactors with heavy atoms
Collect X-ray Absorption edge, collect diffraction data at that
wavelength
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
19
Fitting the Data

Specially designed
programs (e.g.
COOT) and
hardware are used
to refine the
structure in 3D!
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
20
The Beautiful Result


Blue: 2Fobs-Fcalc
Green: (+) Fobs-Fcalc


Red: (-) Fobs-Fcalc


July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
Something missing
Atoms in wrong place
Model outlined
inside density map
21
Conclusions: GES-1


GES-1 crystals bound imipenem
showed ~65% occupancy for the
inhibitor in the active site
Some interactions observed:



July 20, 2015
Covalent bonding between inhibitor and
key active site residue
Multiple hydrogen bonding partners
Salt bridge
Laura Byrnes SULI
22
GES-1 bound Imipenem
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
23
Conclusions: APH(2’’)-1c


The APH(2’’)-Ib structure, with ~25%
sequence identity to APH(2’’)-Ic, not an
ideal model
Future studies



July 20, 2015
Try soaking with 8-bromo-ATP
Crystallize other mutants and WT
Co-crystallize with substrates
Laura Byrnes SULI
24
Acknowledgments

Clyde Smith,


Apurva Mehta,



Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
SULI Program coordinators at SLAC
Office of Science, Department of
Energy
July 20, 2015
Laura Byrnes SULI
25