Transcript EMC of ICs

Electromagnetic Compatibility of
Integrated Circuits (EMC of ICs)
Alexandre Boyer
INSA de Toulouse
April 18 2008
1
OUTLINE
AGENDA
9h - 12h: EMC of ICs – part I (Course)
14h - 17h: EMC of ICs – part II (Course)
OBJECTIVES
At the end of the course, the auditor will be able to understand the origins of
electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) issues at integrated circuits level, the
basic knowledge to face with EMC issues, and become familiar with the most
common circuit-level EMC design guidelines.
PRE REQUISITES
Basic knowledge in electrical circuits, CMOS technology, electromagnetism.
2
OUTLINE
CONTENT
Introduction
EMC
Basics concepts
Emission/Susceptibility
Measurement
methods
EMC
Models
EMC
Guidelines
Conclusion
Origin
/ Future of EMC
3
1. Introduction
4
What is EMC ?
Two examples
« Disturbances of flight instruments
causing trajectory deviations appear when
one or several passengers switch on
electronic devices. » (Air et Cosmos, April
1993)
29th July 1967 : accident of the American
aircraft carrier USSForrestal. The accidental
launching of a rocket blew gas tank and
weapon stocks, killing 135 persons and
causing damages which needed 7 month
reparations. Investigations showed that a
radar induced on plane wiring a sufficient
parasitic voltage to trigger the launching of the
rocket.
5
What is EMC ?
« The ability of a device, equipment or system to function satisfactorily
in its electromagnetic environment without introducing intolerable
electromagnetic disturbance to anything in that environment. »
 Guarantee the simultaneous operation of all nearby electric or electronic
devices and the safety of users in a given electromagnetic environment
 Reduce parasitic electromagnetic emission and their sensitivity or
susceptibility to electromagnetic interferences
 Maximum levels and methods to characterize emission and susceptibility
of an equipment are defined by standards
6
What is EMC ?
Examples of EMC standards
 The existence of EMC specifications is linked to the safety and robustness level that
an equipment must reach.
 EMC standards for automotive, aerospace, military, transport, medical,
telecommunication applications, but also for commercial products
• European EMC directive 89/336/EEC about electronic
products EMC requirements
• IEC-TC77 and CISPR : IEC technical committee related to
EMC standards
• For automotive applications : ISO 7637, ISO 11452, CISPR
25, SAE J1113
CE mark
• For military applications : MIL-STD-461D, MIL-STD-462D
• For aerospace applications : DO-160
• For integrated circuits : IEC 61963, IEC 62132
7
Context - Technology Scale Down
Micron
Deep
submicron
Submicron
Lithography (µm)
Ultra deep Nano scale Deep
Nano
submicron
Industry
Channel length divided by 2 each
18 month in the 90’s
Pentium III
Research has 5 year advance on
industry
80286
2.0
16MHz
1.0
80386
33MH z 486
66MHz
Pentium
120MHz
0.3
0.7GHz
0.25µm
0.2
Pentium IV
3GHz
0.1
Research
Pentium DualCore
2.2GHz
65nm
45nm
32nm
0.05
0.03
Working 7nm
device
0.02
22nm
0.01
83
86
89
92
95
98
01
04
07
10
13
This trend has major
consequences on
electronic systems
safety, reliability, … and
EMC
Year
8
EMC of ICs
Why EMC of ICs
• Until mid 90’s, IC designers had no consideration about EMC problems in
their design. EMc was only handled at system and PCB levels
• Many EMC problems originate from ICs (3rd origin of IC redesign !), as it
is the source of noise emission and sensitivity
• With technology trends (increased clock speed, chip complexity and
reduced voltage), ICs are more emissive and sensitive to noise
• Semiconductor manufacturers are faced with increasing customer
expectations for designing low emission and highly immune ICs
EMC must be handled at IC level
9
EMC of ICs
EMC of IC topics
 Improve or develop EMC measurement methods to respond to new customer’s
requests
 Develop simulation tools to predict EMC of IC behavior
 Develop design guidelines aiming at reducing emission and susceptibility levels
Emission
level
measurement
Simulation
Customer’s specifications
IC emission
spectrum
Target
Frequenc
y
10
EMC of ICs
Design issues
EMC problems handled at
the end of design cycle
DESIGN
FABRICATION
Architectural
Design
Design Entry
Design Architect
Version n°
Version n°
EMC Measurements
Compliance ?
NO GO
GO
11
EMC of ICs
Design issues
DESIGN
Tools
EMC problems handled at
the end of design cycle
Training
Design
EMC Guidelines
validated before fabrication
Architectural
Design
Design Entry
Design Architect
EMC Simulations
Compliance ?
NO GO
GO
FABRICATION
EMC compliant
12
2. EMC Basic Concepts
13
EMC environment
The “EMC” way of thinking
Electrical domain
Electromagnetic domain
Voltage V (Volt)
Electric Field E (V/m)
Current I (Amp)
Magnetic field H (A/m)
Impedance Z (Ohm)
Characteristic impedance Z0 (Ohm)
Z=V/I
Z=E/H
P=I2 x R (watts)
P=H2 x 377 (watts/m2)
far field conditions
14
Specific Units
Voltage units
Wide dynamic range of signals in
EMC → use of dB (decibel)
For example dBV, dBA :
dBV  20  log V 
dBA  20  log  A
Extensive use of dBµV
 V
VdBµV  20  log 
 1µV

  20  log V   120

Milli
Volt
Volt
dBV
100
40
1
60
10
20
0.1
40
1
0
0.01
20
0.1
-20
0.001
0
0.01
-40
0.0001
-20
0.001
-60
0.00001
-40
dBµV
15
Specific Units
Power units
Power
(Watt)
Power
(dBm)
The most common power unit is the “dBm” (dB milli-Watt)
1 MW
90
 P 
PdBmW  10  log  W   10  log PW   30
 1 mW 
1 KW
60
1W
30
1 mW
0
1 µW
-30
1 nW
-60
Exercise: Specific units
1 mV = ___ dBµV
0.1 W = ___ dBm
16
Specific Units
Emission and susceptibility level units
dBµV
dBµV/m
80
50
Class 4
70
60
40
30
Class 5
50
20
40
30K
10
1M
300K
Class 5
3M
Conducted emission level
(CISPR25)
30M
10M
100M
1G
Radiated emission level
(CISPR25)
CISPR 25 : “Radio disturbance characteristics for the protection of receivers used on board
vehicles, boats, and on devices – Limits and methods of measurement”
17
Fourier Transform
Fourier transform: principle
Volt
dB
Time
Time domain measurement
Fourier transform
Freq (Log)
Frequency measurement
Invert Fourier transform
Oscilloscope
Spectrum analyser
18
Fourier Transform
Why Frequency domain is so important ?
Time domain
Frequency domain
Only high level harmonics contribution
appears
Contribution of each harmonic appears
Low level harmonics
contribution
User’s specification
FFT
19
Fourier Transform
Fourier transform - Example
1
0.35
ou
Tr
Tr
-20 dB/dec
1
T
-40 dB/dec
FFT
1
Tr
50 % duty cycle trapezoidal signal
Period T = 100 ns, Tr = Tf = 2 ns
Evaluation of signal bandwidth
20
Emission spectrum
Parasitic emission
(dBµV)
EMC compatible
80
70
Specification for
an IC emission
Sufficient margin
60
Aggressor IC
50
Measured
emission
40
30
20
10
Radiated emission
0
-10
1
10
100
Frequency (MHz)
1000
21
Emission spectrum
Low parasitic emission is a key argument
FM
dBµV 100
Supplier
A
80
RF
20
0
10
Not EMC compliant
Customer's
specified limit
60
40
GSM
Supplier
B
EMC compliant
100 Frequency(MHz)
1000
22
Susceptibility threshold
Immunity level has to be higher than customer specification
Immunity level
(dBmA)
50
Current injection limit
Specification for
board immunity
40
30
Measured
immunity
20
10
Victim IC
0
-10
A very low energy
produces a fault
-20
-30
-40
1
10
100
Frequency (MHz)
1000
23
Notion of margin
Parasitic emission (dBµV)
 To ensure the electromagnetic
compatibility, emission or
susceptibility levels have to be lower
than a nominal target …
 …But it is not sufficient to a zero error
probability !
 Margin are required to compensate
unpredictable variations and reduce
the error probability.
 Margin depends on the
safety level required in
an application domain:
Nominal Level
Safety margin
Process dispersion
Measurement error/dispersion
Component/PCB/System Ageing
Environment
Design Objective
Domain
Lifetime
Margin
Aeronautics
30 years
40 dB
Automotive
10 years
20 dB
Consumer
1 year
0 dB
24
Parasitic coupling mechanisms
Coupling mechanisms
Conducted mode – Common
impedance coupling
Radiated mode –
Antenna coupling
The EM wave propagates
through the air
• Loop : Magnetic field coupling
Example : The VSS
supply track propagates
noise
• Wire : Electric field coupling
25
Parasitic coupling mechanisms
Crosstalk
 Parasitic coupling between nearby conductors.
 Near field coupling ≠ radiated coupling
Capacitive crosstalk
d
t
h
C
Inductive crosstalk
dV
I C
dt
w
d
t
C12
dielectric
ground
C
h
w
dI
V L
dt
L12
dielectric
ground
26
Impedance
R,L,C vs. frequency
Impedance profile of:
•50 ohms resistor
•100pF capacitor
•10nH inductor
Z = constant
•a real 100 pF SMD
capacitor
27
Impedance
Passive components – Real model
Ceramic capacitor
Carbon resistor
Inductor
Understand EMC issues
requires the knowledge of
electronic device parasitics
28
Interconnections
Interconnect parasitics
l
PCB
 Parasitic resistance
 Parasitic inductance
2a
Current
R  Rdc  Rac
l
l
R

ac
Rdc 
2
 2a
a
 l   2l  
L  o   ln    1
2   a  
Package
Bonding wires
Quasi static approximation : If l <
λ/20,
interconnections
are
considered as electrically small
29
Interconnections
Characteristic impedance
• From the electromagnetic point of view:
Coaxial line
E
Z0 
H
Microstrip line
Link to conductor geometry and material properties
• From the electric point of view :
Z0 
R  jL
G  jC
lossless
conductor
L
Z0 
C
Equivalent electrical schematic
30
Interconnections
Impedance matching
Essential for signal integrity
and power transfer
Not adapted: the line suffers
ringing, insertion losses
Adapted: the line is transparent
Voltage
Voltage
time
time
31
Interconnections
Small conductor
Characteristic impedance
What is the optimum characteristic
impedance for a coaxial cable ?
Small
conductor
Power handling
X
weight
X
Low loss
x
Small
capacitance
x
Small inductance
Low Impedance
Or ?
Large
conductor
X
Bending
Ideal values:
• Maximum power : Z0 = 32 
• Minimum loss: Z0 = 77 
x
Cable examples:
• EMC cable (compromise between
power and loss) : Z0 = 50 
x
x
Large conductor
• TV cable (minimize Loss): Z0 = 75 
32
50 Ω adapted equipments
EMC equipments
Spectrum analyzer
Waveform generator
Tem cell
Amplifier
Gtem
33
3. Origin of Emission and
Susceptibility of ICs
34
Two main concepts
Susceptibility to EM waves
Emission of EM waves
Personal entrainments
Noise
interferences
System
Equipments
Printed circuit boards
Components
Safety systems
Hardware fault
Software failure
Function Loss
35
EMC at system level
Integrated circuits are the origin of parasitic emission and susceptibility to
RF disturbances in electronic systems
Emission
Chip
Components
PCB
System
Radiation
Noisy
IC
Interferences
Sensitive
IC
Chip
Components
Coupling
PCB
System
Susceptibility
36
Source of Electromagnetic Interferences
Natural disturbances
(cosmic rays, thunder)
Radio communications,
wireless, radars,…
IC
Electrical
Overstress
IC
activity
Inductive loads,
motors
37
Technology trends
Technology (log scale)
1m
0.35m
0.25m
0.18m
100nm
0.13m
Technology trend costperformance
microcontrollers
90nm
0.13µm
45nm
90nm
32nm
45nm
32nm
22nm
5-years gap
Technology trend
high performance
microprocessors
10nm
65nm
18nm
9nm
7nm
22nm
Year
1nm
2000
2005
2010
Year
2015
2020
38
Technology trends
IC tech.
0.25 µm
0.18 µm
50M
100M
1999
2001
130 nm
90 nm
65 nm
Complexity
250M
500M
1G
Packaging
µC
16 bit
µC
32 bit
2003
µC+DSP
Flash
2005
2µC+4DSP
Mb Flash
2007
Multicore,
DSP
FPGA, eRam
RF multiband
39
Origin of parasitic emission
Basic mechanisms for CMOS circuit current: CMOS inverter exemple
Switching current
VDD
IDD
(0.1mA)
Vin
VSS
Output
capa
ISS (0.1mA)
IDD
(0.1mA)
ISS
(0.1mA)
Time
Voltage
VOUT
Main noise sources comes from AC current sources:
Time
- Clock-driven blocks, synchronized logic
- Memory read/write/refresh
- I/O switching
40
Origin of parasitic emission
 Parasitic emission is linked to voltage drops. The current peak are not
the only responsible of emission.
 Inductance are responsible of the conversion of current peak to voltage
drops.
 Current peaks and voltage drops generate the conducted emission and
also responsible of the radiated emission.
Vdd
i(t)
i(t)
i(t)
50ps
Vss
Switching gates
Time
Vdd
Radiated
Emission
Vss
Internal
switching noise
Voltage drops
i
V  L
t
41
Origin of parasitic emission
Why technology scale down makes things worse ?
Volt
• Current level keeps
almost constant but:
• Faster current switching
Old process
New process
Time
Current
Stronger di/dt
di/dt
Old process
New process
Time
Increase parasitic
noise
42
Origin of parasitic emission
Example: evaluation of switching current in an IC
• 0.1 mA / Gate in 100ps
• 1 Billion gates (32 Bit Micro) => 100A
• 10% switching activity => 10A
• Spreading of current peak (non synchronous switching) => 1A in 1ns
Ampere
Current / gate
Ampere
Vdd
i(t)
1A
Vss
Current / Ic
0.1 mA
time
0.1 ns
1 ns
time
43
Origin of parasitic emission
Example: evaluation of supply voltage bounce
L=0.6nH/mm
VDD
L=1nH/mm
Lead = 10 mm
Chip
1 A en
1 ns
Evaluate noise amplitude :
Lead = 10 mm
VSS
44
Origin of parasitic emission
Overview of influent parameters on parasitic emission
Internal activity of the IC
Output load of the circuit
Filtering effect
interconnections
of
Vdd
IC
Filtering effects of PCB
tracks and external passive
components
i(t)
i(t)
IC Internal
interconnexions
Vss
PCB tracks and
external passive
components
Load
IC activity
IC
45
Susceptibility issues
Less voltage, more IOs
100
200
1000
500
Supply (V)
5.0
Noise margin
reduction
3.3
2.5
1.8
1.2
I/O supply
0.7
Core supply
0.5µ
0.35µ 0.18µ
Technology
90nm
65nm 45nm
46
Susceptibility issues
Multiple parasitic electromagnetic sources
Components
issues
Power
HF
VHF
UHF
SHF
1GW
xHF
THF
Radar Météo
Radars
Satellites
1MW
TV UHF
1KW
MWave
TV VHF
Stat. de base
Hobby
1W
Badge
GSM UMTS
Hobby
1mW
Radar
DECT
Frequency
3 MHz
30 MHz
300 MHz
3 GHz
30 GHz
300 GHz
47
Susceptibility issues
More complex Ics, more levels in susceptibility
Electromagnetic wave
Software failure
Hardware fault
System failure
µp
mixed
Function loss
48
Susceptibility issues
Desynchronisation issues
 Jitter is becoming increasingly important in digital design due to rising operating
frequencies.
 The increase of operating frequencies of digital circuits reduces their dynamic margin
EMI on supply
EMI induced
jitter
Bit error
EMI induced
jitter
Dynamic
failure
49
Origin of IC susceptibility
Overview of influent parameters on IC susceptibility
Filtering effects of PCB tracks
and external passive components
Filtering
effect
interconnections
of
IC
RF
interferences
Internal
perceived noise
Vdd
Impedance of IC nodes (high Z
node = high susceptibility)
Non linear effects of active
devices (conversion RF signals to
DC offsets !)
Block own susceptibility (noise
margin, delay margin, …)
IC Internal
interconnexions
Vss
PCB tracks and
external passive
components
IC active
devices
IC
IC failures
50
Emission / Susceptibility issues
Block type
Emission
Susceptibility
Fast digital I/O
++
-
Power switch output
++
--
Oscillator / PLL / Clock
circuitry
++
++
Charge pump
++
--
Digital block supply
+
-
Analog input/supply
--
++
DC/DC converter
+
++
51